March 27th, 2001
|
#1 |
| I don't spend enough time here
Join Date: March 19th, 2001 Rep Power: 0 | RAEDON DDR 32MB best interim card I have scrutinized countless roundups and reviews for the best interim budget card to fill the gap between the present and the future (when I can afford a GeForce 3 or Raedon 2). With the exception of a few apparent glitches (listed below) I have seen NO mention of any specific problems with the RAEDON DDR 32MB in recent articles. These are the only flaws I have found presently substantiated in print:
16-bit alpha blending bug . . . Who cares, I’ll be in 32 (probably has been patched by now).
Performance drops in some Intel test systems . . . So what, I’ll have an AMD.
Major problems with Windows 2000 drivers . . . Bah, 98SE for me!
It’s also apparently true that in res above 10x7 the fps start to plummet but with my tiny 17” I will only very rarely exceed 10x7. Since the Raedon has proven test after test to maintain excellent image quality even in higher resolutions I don’t care so much about the fps numbers anyway.
Unless any of you can provide current links to prove otherwise I think the RAEDON DDR 32MB is the best choice for me. For an AMD/98se user interested in solid dependable performance with high-end image quality for low-end bucks this appears to be the best choice. To those of you who have helped me arrive at this decision Thank You for your kind assistance . . . It’s not easy to pick the right video card these days! |
| |
| |