Notices

Go Back   FileFront Forums > Main Forums > Tech Discussion

Remember Me?

Tech Discussion
Discuss the latest in Tech, from gaming rigs & graphics cards, to phones & smart watches.
Don't forget Programming 101, and learn to code from our resident experts.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
5255444
Re: GeForce 8400 GS
Von II
February 28th, 2010 01:28 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sgt. D. Pilla View Post
Annd?? A lot of E8400s, mostly the newer binned ones, reach 3.6 - 3.8GHz with a tiny vcore boost...
Im missing your point...the Q6600 reachs 3.6Ghz as well with a bit of vcore boost...They can both be overclocked as easily as each other without much effort...
I was meaning +4.2Ghz on the e8400. And you need to get an early lucky q6600 if you want high speeds. (3.5-3.8Ghz)
5256185
Re: GeForce 8400 GS
PANIC98
March 1st, 2010 01:52 PM
Any other details
5256187
Re: GeForce 8400 GS
*Daedalus
March 1st, 2010 01:54 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by noobst3R View Post
And you need to get an early lucky q6600 if you want high speeds. (3.5-3.8Ghz)
No you don't. Virtually any G0 6600 will get 3.6.
5256516
Re: GeForce 8400 GS
*The.Doctor
March 1st, 2010 07:59 PM
Quote:
A q6600 does not get the same speed as an e8400. And q6600 daily clocks go from 3.0-3.6hgz, so it's impossible to say.
That's not really a fair comparison though. Your talking about a newer 45nm dual core compared to a older 65nm quad core. The Q6600 is a good OC'er, it just requires more volts than a 45nm chip to hit high speeds. Most people i see with Q6600s have them around 3.4-3.6Ghz 24/7, which is still pretty good considering your not going to notice the difference between 3.6 and 4.0 unless your looking at benchmark scores or running a SLI / CF setup.

You also have to consider that its a quad core, which means it will actually be better than a higher clocked dual core in apps and games that have good multi-core support, and it will multi-task better. Even in games that are not well optimized for multi-core CPU's you can see a little boost. I benchmarked my own system after i got my quad (X3350 aka Q9450) clocked at 3.70Ghz against my E3110 aka E8400 @ 4.3Ghz and guess what, the quad produced better minimum framerates in everything despite being clocked 600Mhz slower.
5256527
Re: GeForce 8400 GS
kow_ciller
March 1st, 2010 08:16 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by *The.Doctor View Post
That's not really a fair comparison though. Your talking about a newer 45nm dual core compared to a older 65nm quad core. The Q6600 is a good OC'er, it just requires more volts than a 45nm chip to hit high speeds. Most people i see with Q6600s have them around 3.4-3.6Ghz 24/7, which is still pretty good considering your not going to notice the difference between 3.6 and 4.0 unless your looking at benchmark scores or running a SLI / CF setup.

You also have to consider that its a quad core, which means it will actually be better than a higher clocked dual core in apps and games that have good multi-core support, and it will multi-task better. Even in games that are not well optimized for multi-core CPU's you can see a little boost. I benchmarked my own system after i got my quad (X3350 aka Q9450) clocked at 3.70Ghz against my E3110 aka E8400 @ 4.3Ghz and guess what, the quad produced better minimum framerates in everything despite being clocked 600Mhz slower.
Which very well could be due to having 12mb of cache compared with 6mb of cache on the e8400.
5256532
Re: GeForce 8400 GS
Superfluous Curmudgeon
March 1st, 2010 08:33 PM
I think before going on about which has the best performance after OC'ing, we should take a step back and ask whether Panic is going to want to overclock. Something tells me that he probably won't want to take the long hours and spend the extra $30-$80 to improve his heatsink and airflow which will allow the overclock to be achieved. I could be wrong, but it's something that must be considered.
5256700
Re: GeForce 8400 GS
PANIC98
March 2nd, 2010 05:16 AM
I might not start overclocking in the recent future.
It might come up if I want the extra speed but im looking for the fastest without overclocking at the moment.
5256717
Re: GeForce 8400 GS
Sgt. D. Pilla
March 2nd, 2010 05:38 AM
IMO, E8400.
But thats pure bias, I've never used, or seen the Q6600 in action.
5256783
Re: GeForce 8400 GS
kow_ciller
March 2nd, 2010 08:23 AM
Fastest w/o overclocking has to be e8600. But you'd pay a pretty penny for one.
5258696
Re: GeForce 8400 GS
PANIC98
March 4th, 2010 07:54 AM
Im gonna upgrade my cpu first so that if any better deals for graphics cards come along i will not be screwed.
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
G Force 8400 GS PCI Express Liquidus_wolf Tech Discussion 5 June 3rd, 2008 05:47 AM
Dell's New 8400 Element1 Tech Discussion 7 July 12th, 2004 10:16 PM
Turning Geforce 2 GTS to Geforce 2 Quadro for Free.Increase FSAA speed & Xtra Feature diehard Tech Discussion 0 March 3rd, 2001 03:28 PM


All times are GMT -7.







   
 





This site is part of the Defy Media Gaming network

The best serving of video game culture, since 2001. Whether you're looking for news, reviews, walkthroughs, or the biggest collection of PC gaming files on the planet, Game Front has you covered. We also make no illusions about gaming: it's supposed to be fun. Browse gaming galleries, humor lists, and honest, short-form reporting. Game on!

FileFront Forums - Terms of Service - Top
Copyright © 2002-2016 Game Front. All rights reserved. Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2016, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Forum Theme by Danny King (FileTrekker), Sheepeep & Graeme(rs)
RSS Feed Widget by FeedWind