FileFront Forums

FileFront Forums (http://forums.filefront.com/)
-   Tech Discussion (http://forums.filefront.com/tech-discussion-398/)
-   -   GeForce 8400 GS (http://forums.filefront.com/tech-discussion/418169-geforce-8400-gs.html)

Von II February 28th, 2010 01:28 PM

Re: GeForce 8400 GS
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sgt. D. Pilla (Post 5255439)
Annd?? A lot of E8400s, mostly the newer binned ones, reach 3.6 - 3.8GHz with a tiny vcore boost...
Im missing your point...the Q6600 reachs 3.6Ghz as well with a bit of vcore boost...They can both be overclocked as easily as each other without much effort...

I was meaning +4.2Ghz on the e8400. And you need to get an early lucky q6600 if you want high speeds. (3.5-3.8Ghz)

PANIC98 March 1st, 2010 01:52 PM

Re: GeForce 8400 GS
 
Any other details

*Daedalus March 1st, 2010 01:54 PM

Re: GeForce 8400 GS
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by noobst3R (Post 5255444)
And you need to get an early lucky q6600 if you want high speeds. (3.5-3.8Ghz)

No you don't. Virtually any G0 6600 will get 3.6.

*The.Doctor March 1st, 2010 07:59 PM

Re: GeForce 8400 GS
 
Quote:

A q6600 does not get the same speed as an e8400. And q6600 daily clocks go from 3.0-3.6hgz, so it's impossible to say.
That's not really a fair comparison though. Your talking about a newer 45nm dual core compared to a older 65nm quad core. The Q6600 is a good OC'er, it just requires more volts than a 45nm chip to hit high speeds. Most people i see with Q6600s have them around 3.4-3.6Ghz 24/7, which is still pretty good considering your not going to notice the difference between 3.6 and 4.0 unless your looking at benchmark scores or running a SLI / CF setup.

You also have to consider that its a quad core, which means it will actually be better than a higher clocked dual core in apps and games that have good multi-core support, and it will multi-task better. Even in games that are not well optimized for multi-core CPU's you can see a little boost. I benchmarked my own system after i got my quad (X3350 aka Q9450) clocked at 3.70Ghz against my E3110 aka E8400 @ 4.3Ghz and guess what, the quad produced better minimum framerates in everything despite being clocked 600Mhz slower.

kow_ciller March 1st, 2010 08:16 PM

Re: GeForce 8400 GS
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by *The.Doctor (Post 5256516)
That's not really a fair comparison though. Your talking about a newer 45nm dual core compared to a older 65nm quad core. The Q6600 is a good OC'er, it just requires more volts than a 45nm chip to hit high speeds. Most people i see with Q6600s have them around 3.4-3.6Ghz 24/7, which is still pretty good considering your not going to notice the difference between 3.6 and 4.0 unless your looking at benchmark scores or running a SLI / CF setup.

You also have to consider that its a quad core, which means it will actually be better than a higher clocked dual core in apps and games that have good multi-core support, and it will multi-task better. Even in games that are not well optimized for multi-core CPU's you can see a little boost. I benchmarked my own system after i got my quad (X3350 aka Q9450) clocked at 3.70Ghz against my E3110 aka E8400 @ 4.3Ghz and guess what, the quad produced better minimum framerates in everything despite being clocked 600Mhz slower.

Which very well could be due to having 12mb of cache compared with 6mb of cache on the e8400.

Superfluous Curmudgeon March 1st, 2010 08:33 PM

Re: GeForce 8400 GS
 
I think before going on about which has the best performance after OC'ing, we should take a step back and ask whether Panic is going to want to overclock. Something tells me that he probably won't want to take the long hours and spend the extra $30-$80 to improve his heatsink and airflow which will allow the overclock to be achieved. I could be wrong, but it's something that must be considered.

PANIC98 March 2nd, 2010 05:16 AM

Re: GeForce 8400 GS
 
I might not start overclocking in the recent future.
It might come up if I want the extra speed but im looking for the fastest without overclocking at the moment.

Sgt. D. Pilla March 2nd, 2010 05:38 AM

Re: GeForce 8400 GS
 
IMO, E8400.
But thats pure bias, I've never used, or seen the Q6600 in action.

kow_ciller March 2nd, 2010 08:23 AM

Re: GeForce 8400 GS
 
Fastest w/o overclocking has to be e8600. But you'd pay a pretty penny for one.

PANIC98 March 4th, 2010 07:54 AM

Re: GeForce 8400 GS
 
Im gonna upgrade my cpu first so that if any better deals for graphics cards come along i will not be screwed.


All times are GMT -7.

Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2016, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.0 ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.