Discuss the latest in Tech, from gaming rigs & graphics cards, to phones & smart watches.
Don't forget Programming 101, and learn to code from our resident experts.
So yeah, I'm thinking about upgrading to a better GFX card soon, but I'm not quite sure what to get.
I've looked at the 260 Superclocked (link) already. Looks pretty good. I'm also wondering about ATI. I've never really used ATI, but I'm not a die-hard Nvidia fan. Do you guys think my system could handle a 4890? And yes, I am planning to run a res of 1920x1080, so would having two help at all?
$205 for a 260 is a complete ripoff. I wouldn't pay more than $140 for one. And a 4890 would be fine in your system. I would think that you might want to get a mid-ranged card for now and go for a CPU upgrade as well.
I see no point in you getting either a 260 superclocked (don't know why you would want to given you could get a GTX275, but hey) or a 4890 with such a weak processor. With all the cards you are intent on getting, the processor would severely bottleneck the system.
If you have $400 to spend on 2 4890s, I would suggest you upgrade to a much more powerful processor, maybe even change mobos to a Phenom II, and keep the 8800GT. Then, when you have more money, you could upgrade that (or sell off all the parts that you need, and chip in a bit more to get a better GPU).
$205 for a 260 is a complete ripoff. I wouldn't pay more than $140 for one. And a 4890 would be fine in your system. I would think that you might want to get a mid-ranged card for now and go for a CPU upgrade as well.
I paid less than $205 for my 4890 My advice: get exactly what I've got (see specs in my sig).
Last edited by Adrian Ţepeş; September 5th, 2009 at 06:35 PM.
I see no point in you getting either a 260 superclocked (don't know why you would want to given you could get a GTX275, but hey) or a 4890 with such a weak processor. With all the cards you are intent on getting, the processor would severely bottleneck the system.
If you have $400 to spend on 2 4890s, I would suggest you upgrade to a much more powerful processor, maybe even change mobos to a Phenom II, and keep the 8800GT. Then, when you have more money, you could upgrade that (or sell off all the parts that you need, and chip in a bit more to get a better GPU).
I see. Hmm. Well that answers the question about if my processor can handle it lol.
I see no point in you getting either a 260 superclocked (don't know why you would want to given you could get a GTX275, but hey) or a 4890 with such a weak processor. With all the cards you are intent on getting, the processor would severely bottleneck the system.
It would still be a decent boost, but yeah that X2 is going to bottleneck the system a good bit. My advice would be go with a Phenom II and wait for the Radeon HD 5000 series before you upgrade your 8800.
Quote:
maybe even change mobos to a Phenom II, and keep the 8800GT.
Depending on his mobo, it may already support a Phenom II with a BIOS update. Many of the better AM2+ boards have gotten BIOS updates to support most of the Phenom II lineup by now.
i5 4670K @ 4.5Ghz | ASUS Maximus VI Hero | Venomous X | 8GB Mushkin Radioactive @ 1820
EVGA Geforce GTX 680 SC @ 1125 | 500GB WD Velociraptor | 1TB Spinpoint F3 | 500GB SG 7200.11
Corsair TX-650 | Antec 1200 | Win 7 x64 / Fedora 20 KDE x64 | Gaming on 47" LED 1080P TV
This site is part of the Defy Media Gaming network
The best serving of video game culture, since 2001. Whether you're looking for news, reviews, walkthroughs, or the biggest collection of PC gaming files on the planet, Game Front has you covered. We also make no illusions about gaming: it's supposed to be fun. Browse gaming galleries, humor lists, and honest, short-form reporting. Game on!