FileFront Gaming Forums

Star Trek XI Ship Scaling

This is a discussion on Star Trek XI Ship Scaling within the Starbase 42 forums, part of the Entertainment category; Something that hasn't been addressed properly yet following the new movie. The size of the Federation ships. The USS Kelvin ...

Starbase 42 Is your starship in need of maintenance or does your crew needs some R & R? Dock here and discuss anything related to the TV series and the films.
Please do not discuss anything related to Star Trek games.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old May 21st, 2009
Redefining Reason
 
Join Date: July 13th, 2004
Location: Gloucestershire, U.K.
Posts: 10,424
Rep Power: 22
Aerilon is a person of good adviceAerilon is a person of good adviceAerilon is a person of good adviceAerilon is a person of good adviceAerilon is a person of good adviceAerilon is a person of good adviceAerilon is a person of good adviceAerilon is a person of good adviceAerilon is a person of good adviceAerilon is a person of good adviceAerilon is a person of good advice
Default Star Trek XI Ship Scaling

Something that hasn't been addressed properly yet following the new movie. The size of the Federation ships. The USS Kelvin (a Survey Ship), which we can assume is smaller than the USS Enterprise, had a crew of over 800 - this we heard when Pike told Kirk his Father saved over 800 lives. In addition to this, she held a significant number of shuttles for her size, we saw these as the Kelvin was on a ramming course the the Nevada.

This also goes for the new Enterprise too. The shuttle bay was huge (compared to the typical Constitution Class), and in addition to that, did anyone see the size of engineering?

Having studied pictures of the new ship, it would indicate that the XI Enterprise is more or less the same size as the TMP Enterprise / Enterprise-A. For an example, take a look at the windows and torpedo launchers. They're practically the same size (thus referencing us to a ship of the same size). However, all material (related to the movie) indicates that this new Enterprise is actually larger (in length) than a Galaxy Class Starship.

I just can't see it personally... I'd like to know your thoughts.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old May 21st, 2009
Bs|Archaon's Avatar
I would die without GF
 
Join Date: March 14th, 2006
Location: Northampton, UK
Posts: 5,806
Rep Power: 13
Bs|Archaon is close friends with everybodyBs|Archaon is close friends with everybodyBs|Archaon is close friends with everybodyBs|Archaon is close friends with everybodyBs|Archaon is close friends with everybodyBs|Archaon is close friends with everybodyBs|Archaon is close friends with everybody
Send a message via MSN to Bs|Archaon
Default Re: Star Trek XI Ship Scaling

Well if the Kelvin had 800 crew the Enterprise would almost certainly have more, which when you consider the Galaxy class' normal capacity of 1500 it makes sense for the Enterprise to be that big. I imagine the Galaxy class has a larger displacement and crew capacity due to the sheer width of the ships, but the Enterprise could well be longer.
__________________
Intel Core 2 Duo E8400 | DFI LANPARTY JR P45-T2RS | 4GB Corsair XMS2 DDR2-800
BFG GeForce 8800GTS 320MB | Dell 2407WFP-HC & Samsung 40" 1080p LCD
Asus Xonar HDAV 1.3, Denon AVR-2309 & Tangent Clarity 4 (Stereo)
300Gb WD VelociRaptor & ~3TB Storage | Lian Li V531B | Silverstone ST60F 600w
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old May 21st, 2009
AlDaja's Avatar
One foot in, one foot out...
 
Join Date: September 5th, 2006
Location: North of Ground Zero
Posts: 3,575
Rep Power: 12
AlDaja is addicted to GFAlDaja is addicted to GFAlDaja is addicted to GFAlDaja is addicted to GFAlDaja is addicted to GFAlDaja is addicted to GFAlDaja is addicted to GFAlDaja is addicted to GFAlDaja is addicted to GFAlDaja is addicted to GFAlDaja is addicted to GF
Default Re: Star Trek XI Ship Scaling

This is where J.J.'s production crew didn’t do their homework. The original Enterprise only had a crew compliment of 430 according to all the specs I have on it and the Enterprise is suppose to be a larger ship then the Kelvin, but then again, this is an alternate time line as the new Enterprise would suggest.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old May 21st, 2009
.
 
Join Date: November 23rd, 2002
Posts: 5,500
Rep Power: 20
Monster_user has disabled reputation
Default Re: Star Trek XI Ship Scaling

They probably skimmed through on the research, going for general facts.

Such as "What do we know about Spock's childhood?", or "What kind of [extreme] sports exist in Star Trek?".

Or in this case "About how many crew do Federation Starships usually have?". In the 24th century, that answer would probably be around 700-800.

Although, a crew compliment of 250-500 would seem more practical for the 23rd century.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

As for the Engineering section, I believe it is supposed to be located on the Saucer, for early Trek ships. Not sure what the "Secondary Hull" was used for. Deflector control, Astrometrics, and Shuttles? Maybe it was crew quarters,...

In this case, it appears that a large portion of the Secondary Hull seems to be used for shuttlecraft.

I doubt the new Enterprise is larger than an Excelsior class vessel.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old May 22nd, 2009
MrFancypants's Avatar
The Bad
FileFront Forum Administrator
 
Join Date: December 7th, 2003
Location: Germany
Posts: 10,964
Rep Power: 50
MrFancypants has been noticed by the AdminsMrFancypants has been noticed by the AdminsMrFancypants has been noticed by the AdminsMrFancypants has been noticed by the AdminsMrFancypants has been noticed by the AdminsMrFancypants has been noticed by the AdminsMrFancypants has been noticed by the AdminsMrFancypants has been noticed by the AdminsMrFancypants has been noticed by the AdminsMrFancypants has been noticed by the AdminsMrFancypants has been noticed by the Admins
Default Re: Star Trek XI Ship Scaling

Wouldn't it make sense that an older ship has less automatization and requires more crew?
__________________
Yet across the gulf of space, minds that are to our minds as ours are to those of the beasts that perish, intellects vast and cool and unsympathetic, regarded this earth with envious eyes, and slowly and surely drew their plans against us. - H.G.Wells
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old May 22nd, 2009
Jetfreak's Avatar
Filipino Ingenuity
 
Join Date: April 20th, 2007
Location: The Philippines
Posts: 3,046
Rep Power: 10
Jetfreak is almost as leet as RevengeJetfreak is almost as leet as RevengeJetfreak is almost as leet as RevengeJetfreak is almost as leet as RevengeJetfreak is almost as leet as RevengeJetfreak is almost as leet as RevengeJetfreak is almost as leet as RevengeJetfreak is almost as leet as RevengeJetfreak is almost as leet as RevengeJetfreak is almost as leet as Revenge
Default Re: Star Trek XI Ship Scaling

Bernd from EAS already has an article on that. If we omit the Shuttlebay and Water Pipe styled engineering section, a 300m length for the JJprise is the best way to go.

Ex Astris Scientia - The New Enterprise Design
__________________

"When you are face to face with a difficulty, you are up against a discovery."
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old May 22nd, 2009
.
 
Join Date: November 23rd, 2002
Posts: 5,500
Rep Power: 20
Monster_user has disabled reputation
Default Re: Star Trek XI Ship Scaling

Quote:
Originally Posted by MrFancypants View Post
Wouldn't it make sense that an older ship has less automatization and requires more crew?
Yeah, for a ship of the same size. The U.S.S. Voyager is of similar size, and operates with a crew of 150-200. It may be slightly smaller than the Constitution.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old May 22nd, 2009
Redefining Reason
 
Join Date: July 13th, 2004
Location: Gloucestershire, U.K.
Posts: 10,424
Rep Power: 22
Aerilon is a person of good adviceAerilon is a person of good adviceAerilon is a person of good adviceAerilon is a person of good adviceAerilon is a person of good adviceAerilon is a person of good adviceAerilon is a person of good adviceAerilon is a person of good adviceAerilon is a person of good adviceAerilon is a person of good adviceAerilon is a person of good advice
Default Re: Star Trek XI Ship Scaling

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bs|Archaon View Post
Well if the Kelvin had 800 crew the Enterprise would almost certainly have more, which when you consider the Galaxy class' normal capacity of 1500 it makes sense for the Enterprise to be that big.
I don't understand why it would make sense for the new Enterprise to have a crew of 2500.

Quote:
Originally Posted by AlDaja View Post
This is where J.J.'s production crew didn’t do their homework. The original Enterprise only had a crew compliment of 430 according to all the specs I have on it and the Enterprise is suppose to be a larger ship then the Kelvin, but then again, this is an alternate time line as the new Enterprise would suggest.
Wouldn't surprise me one bit.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Monster_user View Post
As for the Engineering section, I believe it is supposed to be located on the Saucer, for early Trek ships. Not sure what the "Secondary Hull" was used for. Deflector control, Astrometrics, and Shuttles? Maybe it was crew quarters,...

In this case, it appears that a large portion of the Secondary Hull seems to be used for shuttlecraft.
This would explain a fair amount, though it still doesn't explain how some ships (the Kelvin) have 800 people on for the ride. Especially if most of the crew quaters are in the saucer, and the 'hull' is for shuttles and the like, that leaves us with even less room for the crew.

Quote:
Originally Posted by MrFancypants View Post
Wouldn't it make sense that an older ship has less automatization and requires more crew?
It would make sense yeah, but I'm not sure how wise it is to word sense with this new movie, especially when we are comparing it to typical Trek.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jetfreak View Post
Bernd from EAS already has an article on that. If we omit the Shuttlebay and Water Pipe styled engineering section, a 300m length for the JJprise is the best way to go.

Ex Astris Scientia - The New Enterprise Design
Yeah, I've read the Ex Astris Scientia Pages. Just wanted to see what you guys thought about it.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Monster_user View Post
Yeah, for a ship of the same size. The U.S.S. Voyager is of similar size, and operates with a crew of 150-200. It may be slightly smaller than the Constitution.
The TMP Constitution is 305m in size, the Intrepid is 344m in size. We must remember though, that the Constitution is more compact, has larger nacelles, and has a lot of space within it. The Intrepid uses up a lot of her space, and does so well.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old May 22nd, 2009
.
 
Join Date: November 23rd, 2002
Posts: 5,500
Rep Power: 20
Monster_user has disabled reputation
Default Re: Star Trek XI Ship Scaling

Quote:
Originally Posted by AlDaja View Post
This is where J.J.'s production crew didn’t do their homework. The original Enterprise only had a crew compliment of 430 according to all the specs I have on it and the Enterprise is suppose to be a larger ship then the Kelvin, but then again, this is an alternate time line as the new Enterprise would suggest.
Is it documented that the Enterprise is bigger than the Kelvin? Or perhaps I just wasn't paying attention to scale. The Kelvin's entire Secondary Hull seemed to be used as a shuttle bay.

The Enterprise doesn't have to be the largest ship in the fleet. In the movies, it was the second largest, the U.S.S. Excelsior was the largest ship shown in the movies.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Aerilon View Post
This would explain a fair amount, though it still doesn't explain how some ships (the Kelvin) have 800 people on for the ride. Especially if most of the crew quaters are in the saucer, and the 'hull' is for shuttles and the like, that leaves us with even less room for the crew.
I would suspect that the Kelvin is as big as an Ambassador class starship. (Enterprise-C). Not being able to find any mention of a crew compliment, I doubt the new Enterprise has much more than the original crew compliment of a Constitution class.


------------------

Spoiler:
Actually, I just remembered the sequence where they ejected the "warp core". They had multiple ejections from several locations on the top of the Secondary hull.


Which means that the Engine room is on the Secondary Hull. Which puts us back to square one.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old May 22nd, 2009
Afterburner's Avatar
Hakkaa Paalle!*cut them down!*
 
Join Date: June 1st, 2005
Location: The Mitten
Posts: 6,573
Rep Power: 18
Afterburner is addicted to GFAfterburner is addicted to GFAfterburner is addicted to GFAfterburner is addicted to GFAfterburner is addicted to GFAfterburner is addicted to GFAfterburner is addicted to GFAfterburner is addicted to GFAfterburner is addicted to GFAfterburner is addicted to GFAfterburner is addicted to GF
Send a message via AIM to Afterburner Send a message via Yahoo to Afterburner
Default Re: Star Trek XI Ship Scaling

There is a pretty simple explanation. It's just a movie.
__________________

Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -7.