FileFront Gaming Forums

Star Trek XI Ship Scaling

This is a discussion on Star Trek XI Ship Scaling within the Starbase 42 forums, part of the Entertainment category; Originally Posted by Aerilon I don't understand why it would make sense for the new Enterprise to have a crew ...

Starbase 42 Is your starship in need of maintenance or does your crew needs some R & R? Dock here and discuss anything related to the TV series and the films.
Please do not discuss anything related to Star Trek games.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #11  
Old May 23rd, 2009
Bs|Archaon's Avatar
I would die without GF
 
Join Date: March 14th, 2006
Location: Northampton, UK
Posts: 5,806
Rep Power: 13
Bs|Archaon is close friends with everybodyBs|Archaon is close friends with everybodyBs|Archaon is close friends with everybodyBs|Archaon is close friends with everybodyBs|Archaon is close friends with everybodyBs|Archaon is close friends with everybodyBs|Archaon is close friends with everybody
Send a message via MSN to Bs|Archaon
Default Re: Star Trek XI Ship Scaling

Quote:
Originally Posted by Aerilon View Post
I don't understand why it would make sense for the new Enterprise to have a crew of 2500.
Who said anything about 2,500? I just said it's probably more than 800. I mentioned the 1,500 crew of the Galaxy class because you asked whether it makes sense for the new Consitution to be longer than the Galaxy. Although I may have over-stated that, 1,500 was from memory the Galaxy may well take less or more than that.

You also have to remember that technology generally gets smaller as time goes on. Despite the technology on a Galaxy class being considerably more advanced, overall it probably needs less space than the outdated technology on a Constitution. Hence the warp core vs massive engineering area, and if you think back to TOS the old engineering room was also quite large. Even though the areas where the engineering crew went were quite small, the actual warp core (assuming that it is a primitive warp core and not something else) is huge.
Spoiler:



As well as being huge you might notice a lot of pipe-like objects, such as the one Scotty is working on, the ones that look like support beams but could be pipes, and there's a shedload in the 'core' in the background. Granted it doesn't look like a sanitation plant like the new one, but I can see where they got the inspiration from.

Now a modern warp core takes up a few decks, but on-screen I'd say they're roughly a few meters diameter, so it's still relatively compact compared to the warp core shown there. Just an example that bigger isn't always better, and that newer ships could probably carry the same amount of crew in a smaller chassis than previous designs. If anything I'd say the Intrepid is an exception to the rule, since that class is specifically designed to need less crew and is also a testbed for bio-neural circuitry and all kinds of other shiny things, so I suspect that is the opposite and actually has a lot of space taken up by the technology rather than the crew. Though saying that, from what we see on-screen they're not exactly utilitarian inside, there's a hell of a lot of space compared to what there would be on a similarly sized Consitution considering that the Intrepid has about 1/3 of the crew complement.



While I assumed that the Enterprise is larger and has a larger crew complement than the Kelvin, I guess Monster is right that it doesn't have to be bigger than the flagship. I guess it's possible that as a survey ship the Kelvin could actually be a large ship outfitted for...well...surveys, with a large capacity of shuttles and a lot of scientific/survery staff. They'd still be counted as part of the crew but not necessary for running the ship itself; if that's true and the Enterprise doesn't have such a large complement of 'sciency stuff', then it's possible that the more powerful flagship needs less crew than a survey vessel. It would probably require more to operate, but I suppose that doesn't mean more in total.
__________________
Intel Core 2 Duo E8400 | DFI LANPARTY JR P45-T2RS | 4GB Corsair XMS2 DDR2-800
BFG GeForce 8800GTS 320MB | Dell 2407WFP-HC & Samsung 40" 1080p LCD
Asus Xonar HDAV 1.3, Denon AVR-2309 & Tangent Clarity 4 (Stereo)
300Gb WD VelociRaptor & ~3TB Storage | Lian Li V531B | Silverstone ST60F 600w

Last edited by Tricorder; June 18th, 2009 at 04:52 AM.. Reason: Added [Spoiler] tags on the image.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old June 16th, 2009
Yuuki_Minoru's Avatar
shotguns demons back to hell.
 
Join Date: June 16th, 2009
Posts: 24
Rep Power: 0
Yuuki_Minoru is a n00b
Default Re: Star Trek XI Ship Scaling

I think its encridibly hard to compare their sizes due to:

A) all external shots of the ship were fast, shaky, and bloom-y.
B) the new movie has no Trek-tech-based information in it.

thus I conclude that the new movie is non-cannon, and comparing it to anything, including itself, is fruitless.

=P
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old June 16th, 2009
NCC1017spock's Avatar
abebob!
 
Join Date: April 24th, 2007
Location: United States
Posts: 2,030
Rep Power: 8
NCC1017spock knows the best jokesNCC1017spock knows the best jokesNCC1017spock knows the best jokesNCC1017spock knows the best jokesNCC1017spock knows the best jokesNCC1017spock knows the best jokes
Send a message via MSN to NCC1017spock Send a message via Yahoo to NCC1017spock
Default Re: Star Trek XI Ship Scaling

In the movie, the Enterprise dwarf's the galaxy class big time! O_O I'd say this enterrpise is easily twice the size of the galaxy class, remember during the movie, when the shuttle leaves the Enterprise shuttle bay? And Kirk and Sulu jump out, and down to vulcan? When you see the shuttle leave, there are racks of shuttles there, like rows 5 or 6 high of shuttles....

O_O the people who made this movie did a great job from an entertaiment point of view, but a made a nightmare from a cannon/logistic's and mathmatic's point of view..... O_O
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old June 16th, 2009
Redefining Reason
 
Join Date: July 13th, 2004
Location: Gloucestershire, U.K.
Posts: 10,425
Rep Power: 22
Aerilon is a person of good adviceAerilon is a person of good adviceAerilon is a person of good adviceAerilon is a person of good adviceAerilon is a person of good adviceAerilon is a person of good adviceAerilon is a person of good adviceAerilon is a person of good adviceAerilon is a person of good adviceAerilon is a person of good adviceAerilon is a person of good advice
Default Re: Star Trek XI Ship Scaling

I don't think this new Enterprise is twice the size of a Galaxy class, though it wouldn't suprise me if the new Enterprise IS the size of your typical Galaxy Class. Does make you wonder though, firstly why various parts of the ship (windows mainly) appear to be the same as your typical Constitution, and what they're going to do if Abrams' gets onto TNG ships. They're going to end up with Cubes the size of Planets.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old June 16th, 2009
NCC1017spock's Avatar
abebob!
 
Join Date: April 24th, 2007
Location: United States
Posts: 2,030
Rep Power: 8
NCC1017spock knows the best jokesNCC1017spock knows the best jokesNCC1017spock knows the best jokesNCC1017spock knows the best jokesNCC1017spock knows the best jokesNCC1017spock knows the best jokes
Send a message via MSN to NCC1017spock Send a message via Yahoo to NCC1017spock
Default Re: Star Trek XI Ship Scaling

most likly.... and that tiny kevlin class ship, and a huge fleet of shuttles, enough to e-vac a wophing size crew of 800.....

"Your father was captin of a ship for (12-15?) minutes, he saved the lives of all 800 people on board including yours."

-capitan pike.....

so yea, huge ships, huge crews, seem to be how JJ works. My god, that star base we saw around earth? O_O Must have had thousands apon thousands on that....
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old June 18th, 2009
Jetfreak's Avatar
Filipino Ingenuity
 
Join Date: April 20th, 2007
Location: The Philippines
Posts: 3,046
Rep Power: 10
Jetfreak is almost as leet as RevengeJetfreak is almost as leet as RevengeJetfreak is almost as leet as RevengeJetfreak is almost as leet as RevengeJetfreak is almost as leet as RevengeJetfreak is almost as leet as RevengeJetfreak is almost as leet as RevengeJetfreak is almost as leet as RevengeJetfreak is almost as leet as RevengeJetfreak is almost as leet as Revenge
Default Re: Star Trek XI Ship Scaling

[Offtopic/]

lol, I just noticed how NCCSpocks' and Ash's sigs look so aestherically similar.
__________________

"When you are face to face with a difficulty, you are up against a discovery."
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old June 18th, 2009
Redefining Reason
 
Join Date: July 13th, 2004
Location: Gloucestershire, U.K.
Posts: 10,425
Rep Power: 22
Aerilon is a person of good adviceAerilon is a person of good adviceAerilon is a person of good adviceAerilon is a person of good adviceAerilon is a person of good adviceAerilon is a person of good adviceAerilon is a person of good adviceAerilon is a person of good adviceAerilon is a person of good adviceAerilon is a person of good adviceAerilon is a person of good advice
Default Re: Star Trek XI Ship Scaling

Quote:
Originally Posted by NCC1017spock View Post
"Your father was captin of a ship for (12-15?) minutes, he saved the lives of all 800 people on board including yours."

so yea, huge ships, huge crews, seem to be how JJ works.
Either these ships were stupidly sized, or they were crammed full of crewmen.

Quote:
Originally Posted by NCC1017spock View Post
My god, that star base we saw around earth? O_O Must have had thousands apon thousands on that....
Not quite that bad. If you think how big the Space Dock is from TNG, and then you think a Galaxy Class can fit through the doors... There would have to be at least one million people on a TNG Space Dock.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jetfreak View Post
[Offtopic/]

lol, I just noticed how NCCSpocks' and Ash's sigs look so aestherically similar.
I made his signature for him.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old June 18th, 2009
NCC1017spock's Avatar
abebob!
 
Join Date: April 24th, 2007
Location: United States
Posts: 2,030
Rep Power: 8
NCC1017spock knows the best jokesNCC1017spock knows the best jokesNCC1017spock knows the best jokesNCC1017spock knows the best jokesNCC1017spock knows the best jokesNCC1017spock knows the best jokes
Send a message via MSN to NCC1017spock Send a message via Yahoo to NCC1017spock
Default Re: Star Trek XI Ship Scaling

yea, and sorry about tghat new sig I asked for, some things of come up....

..... you guys head over the the "guys and feelings" thread in the pub section. I need help now more then ever.... (check my last post)
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old June 25th, 2009
All hail the messiah!
Warrant Officer
 
Join Date: March 6th, 2006
Location: United Socialist States of America!
Posts: 2,251
Rep Power: 10
086goinfast has a powerful reputation086goinfast has a powerful reputation086goinfast has a powerful reputation086goinfast has a powerful reputation086goinfast has a powerful reputation086goinfast has a powerful reputation
Default Re: Star Trek XI Ship Scaling

Well, a snap together model of the new Enterprise is coming out in 2010 and it will be 11.5 inches at 1:2500th scale. And if the sales numbers for this one are good they will do a 28.5 inch 1:1000th scale. Also the Polar lights 1701-A will be "about" 11 inches long at 1:1000th scale. This supports the length that ILM released of 2,357 feet(718 plus meters)...interesting.
__________________
My Games:
NR2K3(patched;300+ tracks;2000+ cars)online name-086goinfast
ST:BC(KM1.0-custom) ST:Legacy(custom)
ST:Armada(custom-will upload) ST:Armada2(custom-will upload)
SW:EAW(custom) SW:FOC(custom)
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old June 26th, 2009
GF Pwns Me!
 
Join Date: April 24th, 2003
Posts: 46
Rep Power: 0
Konrad9 should make some friends
Default Re: Star Trek XI Ship Scaling

Quote:
Originally Posted by 086goinfast View Post
Well, a snap together model of the new Enterprise is coming out in 2010 and it will be 11.5 inches at 1:2500th scale. And if the sales numbers for this one are good they will do a 28.5 inch 1:1000th scale. Also the Polar lights 1701-A will be "about" 11 inches long at 1:1000th scale. This supports the length that ILM released of 2,357 feet(718 plus meters)...interesting.
Whiiiich meshes with what the people who built the digital model have said.

And if I'm going to believe ANYONE, I'm going to believe the people who *literally* built the model.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -7.