![]() |
Re: Tim Tebow Quote:
Where I'd be worried is that QB's of the style of Tebow, Vince Young, Michael Vick,even Cam Newton, etc the "running-QBs" tend not to have long and successful careers. I'd be worried about Tebow getting mashed by someone like James Harrison and coming back a shell of his former self (like Vick after he broke his leg in 2003). We'll see how he does against Brady and the Patriots this weekend. Pats defense isn't what it used to be, but Brady and the offense are surely capable of putting up more points than their defense will allow (kinda like how the Saints are playing). |
Re: Tim Tebow Quote:
That aside, the option offense was never supposed to be the permanent solution in Denver, it's just been the plan to ease Tebow into the offense, and considering that Tebow has fewer starts than some current Rookie quarterbacks, I don't think he's doing bad. I remember looking at a comparison of the first 10 starts of Tebow to Elway, Brady, Montana and some of the other greatest QBs or all time, and Tebow generally has about the same pass completion percentage, but with fewer interceptions and more touchdowns. He also has more rushing yards, but that goes without saying. Quote:
Quote:
The Patriots offense is lightning in a bottle, but Brady can be pressured, and there are few defenses these days that can pressure a QB like the Broncos, who have brought back the concept of "Orange Crush". In the secondary they've got Brian Dawkins and Champ Bailey, both veterans and damn near the best at their positions. It isn't even a question of Defenses, it's a question of Defense, whether the Broncos defense can keep Brady from Bradying. |
Re: Tim Tebow Quote:
Quote:
Oh yeah? Well, soccer sucks! |
| All times are GMT -7. |
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2016, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.0 ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.