August 31st, 2010
|
#62 |
| People say I post too much
Join Date: December 1st, 2009 Location: australia mackay qld coast nrth Status: Available Rep Power: 14 | Re: Model describes universe with no big bang, no beginning, and no end. So the balloons edge is expanding faster than light itself, everything in the balloon is limited to a speed under that of light and its waves, and l come back to, the edge of the balloon is matter, travelling into the unknown at over light speeds ?
Isnt that matter, even if unrestricted by our universe's laws, moving faster than light at the edge ?
And isnt the expantion effect, in effect undetectable, as all particals expand at the same rate.
So in effect it could be several times the speed of light, we just cannot test to tell what the expantion rate is properly ?
Are these two things not seperate things ?
l assumed that expantion didnt have an effect on our speeds because everything is expanding at the same rate, and we dont see it because of this.
Our universe being a bubble still expanding, and from what we can tell faster and faster, if the edge can beat light speeds, one would then assume an utter mother CRAP LOAD of dark energy yet unseen out there.
omg, the GOD partical popped into my head !
lm used to seeing explosions inside our universe, they have alot of unseen energy released, expand and dissipate, the particals inside the explosion dont expand expedentually, but the edge of the explosion, if we take a nuke for exsample, will expand rapidly [shock wave] and roughtly 3/4 through the explosion the energy will start to dissipate.
The big bang, an explosion, expanding into nothing has no restrictions, that we can see anyway, how can we tell if our matter/particals are actually getting bigger metrically or if they are travelling at beyond light speeds ? All theory ?
Yes relative ! no relativity ! LOL ! Time expantion along a metric dimention, only moving in one direction.l grasp it, just find it mindboggling ! |
|
Last edited by jackripped; August 31st, 2010 at 04:38 PM.
Reason: Its , well, relative !
|
| |