Quote:
Because no one cares that he's Muslim besides the complete idiots that only Glenn Beck listens too.
|
I disagree, I'm sure that people care about their president's ideology and religion.
Quote:
And Japan's, does that mean japan is Anti-Semitic, Anti-Zionist and Pro-Iran/Palestinians?
|
What? I was talking about Obama's mission to create a West with no nukes, not about his anti-Semitism.
Quote:
You've waited 30 years and the US has waited 50 on Korea, there is a obvious reason.
|
The reason is then left-wing, people who actually think that diplomacy can help when it comes to Islam / Communism.
Quote:
Turkey doesn't seem to care much, just Turkey's media does. Besides, Syria, Turkey and Iran hav pretty good living conditions, just Iran has a oppressive government.
|
I'm sure that Turkey will care, when Israeli war-jets will fly over Iran's nuclear factories and will destroy the Iranian nukes. Iran and Turkey are good friends. That's one of the reasons why Iran created the Hezbollah, and Turkey doesn't care about it.
Quote:
Great. But you do realize you don't sound all that better then the religious retards screaming OBAMA IS THE ANTICHRIST, HE'S A RACIST, COMMUNIST AND DIRTY MUSLIM
|
I'm not saying that he's the anti-Christ, as I am Jewish and we don't believe in this. But he
is a racist, socialist Muslim.
Quote:
Can you give some quotes please? Obama made some statements which sounded racist towards whites, but it wasn't really that racist, then again, he is half white, wait his Dad is Kenyan, so he has no Arabic blood.....
|
You want me to give you the anti-Semitic and the anti-white statments of Obama's priest? And whether he has Arab blood or not, he still is a pro-Arab anti-Israeli president, so it's not really his blood that counts, but his acts and ideology. If he tells me to stop building in my own capital, he's an anti-Semite, no matter what his race is.
He loses America's best fiends (Poland, India, Israel, others), just because he wants to have the Arabs on his side.
Quote:
Your an idiot. The USA is the #1 manufacturer of oil, thats why Russia is so important to Iran.
|
The US has its oil from Mexico and from the Arab countries. You cannot take someone's reasources and claim that you have producted them. Also, you sentence doesn't make any sense.
Quote:
Why? Because one is a filthy arab muslim country and the other is just Korea? You can easily compared Iran and NK since they have similar statements, similar goals and similar threats, plus similar way of carrying them out, not doing anything.
|
Iran is not an Arab country, they are Persians. And they are Muslims, not Communists, so their goals are different from Korea's. And their ways are not similar at all, you can't compare South Korea and Israel. North Korea doesn't tell the media how bad South Korea is. They want to attack them, but because of an ideology, not because they want to force their culture on SK. Iran wants to destroy Israel because of religion. These are not the same cases.
Quote:
Do you know anything about the NK vs. SK ordeal?
|
I know that they are enemies. One wants to destroy the other because one is Communist. That's why we don't want that one (North Korea) will have nukes. And if they have, we need to destroy them. Before the invasion to SK.
Quote:
Have you ever heard of Ronald Reagan? Again, your forgetting the Nuclear Weapon count, Israel has 200, France has 200, China has 200 and NK has about 15, America has about 15,000 and Russia has about 20,000, so it makes sense to want less nukes.
|
Why? You may want China to have less, but why do you want countries like Israel, France, and the US to lose the nukes? The US needs them so Russia won't attack them. Russia needs them so close countries won't attack it. Israel needs them so Israel's enemies (the Muslim countries) won't attack it, and France needs them because it's one of their protections. So why have less?
Quote:
I assume the US will get it first....
|
Whoever will win the WWIII, we can try to avoid it by not giving up any nukes.
Quote:
If it wasn't for left wingers the US would not have attained the power status it has today.
|
I'm talking about the left-wing in Israel.
Quote:
It doesn't matter if 3000+ years ago it was your capital, that was 3,000+ years ago, you don't see Poland renaming itself Warsaw, do you?
|
I meant, it was our capital FOR 3000+ years, when we had independence, lost it, and declared it by ourselves again. And since THERE WAS NO COUNTRY IN HERE, it is our capital. As I said, Jordan controled it, Jordan attacked us (because they thought that they are going to win), and Jordan lost it. And Jordan don't want it anymore. So it's fully ours.
Eretz Yisrael (the land of Israel) belongs to us, to the Jews, and we have every right to live here, in our homeland.
Quote:
Because of the shit in Pakistan oh
|
The US should not help Afganistan. Afganistan wants to destroy India. So the Indians have a pretty good reason to be angry, when the US help the Afgans. So Obama's helping policies towards Afganistan are harming the connection between the US and India.
Quote:
There is nothing building up a war between the US and Russia, its just right wing idiots who wants one for no real reason at all.
|
The right-wing wants nukes, so the US could defend itself. The left-wing wants to leave the US with no protection. And the moment the US will become much weaker than Russia, there might be a war. And because of the left-wing, not only that the war will happen, but the left-wingers might also cause the US to lose the war. Without the nukes, Russia may consider a war, so it will be a pretty good reason to have nukes, even if just to avoid the war.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr. Pedantic Did he? I've never heard him deny the fact. |
So you should start listening to him, you'll hear that he's exactly the anti-Semitic pro-Arab person I say he is.
Quote:
Can you post proof of this?
|
Can a past of Islam change the path to president for Obama? - Examiner.com Obama accused of <I>helping</i> Iran Obama Lies - Updated to reflect new dishonesties 04/03/2008 | THE AUDACITY OF HYPOCRISY | Media Lies | ObamaLies.com | Exposing Mainstream Media Hypocrisy and Lies Atlas Shrugs: Muslim in the White House?
ETC ETC ETC
Try reading my wondeful topic "A religion of peace?" that I've posted in this forum. Really, it's a good one. I just gave up, as I saw how many lies people spread here.
Quote:
To be honest, as long as it doesn't interfere with national policy, I couldn't care less if he believed green men from Mars kidnapped his wife.
|
But it does effect his policies.
Quote:
Why aren't you allowed to say it?
|
YouTube - Whitest Kids U Know: It's illegal to say...
You'll understand...
Quote:
That's because human civilization pretty much [b]is[/]b Western civilization. But going back to your argument; if Russia et al. do win a third world war, then why won't they have these "no-oil technologies" you're talking about? When Allies won WW2 they basically stripped Berlin dry of anything that had remote technological value. Why won't this happen again?
|
Because the technologies may be destroyed. And no, most of the human civilization is not Western.
Quote:
No, we haven't. The only good thing about your possession of nuclear weapons is that you haven't used them yet. You haven't acknowledged the existence of nuclear weapons. You haven't signed the non-proliferation treaty. In short, you haven't done a lot of the things that would go towards me trusting you with nukes.
|
Well, Israel needs the nukes, so other countries will be more afraid of attacking us. Still, no one proved that we have nukes, and we have never said that we want to use them. Unlike Iran. Also, the Israeli army is
much stronger than the Iranian, so it is unlikely that Israel will choose to use the nukes. Again, unlike Iran.
Quote:
Then why don't you blame Bush for not stopping the process? Why don't you blame Medvedev? Putin? Gorbachev? Clinton? Why specifically Obama?
And I admit that I haven't done a poll or anything, but I think that I would be hard pressed to find a significant proportion of the population that would not welcome a world where the knowledge to build a nuclear weapon did not exist.
|
Because these presidents don't increase the process as much as Obama does.
And the population you're talking about doesn't know what's good for it.
Quote:
I never realized you gave aid to Arab countries in the first place.
And I'm afraid I'm going to have to say there's too much bullshit here, again. I just can't cope.
|
We help those who are ready to recognize us (and we gave help to the Palestinians, even tough the Palestinian mission is to destroy us). The West should stop giving money to the Arab countries.
Quote:
So why is ideology relevant? There is no proof that even if Obama were all you claimed he was, that it has come through in his administration's policies. So why give him such a hard time about it?
|
He stick his nose into Jerusalem, and he wants a Palestinian state. So he's ideology is pretty relevant.
Quote:
I'd have to say, if it came down to it, there are a lot more of us than there are of you.
|
Israel is an independent Jewish state. The Jewish Israelis decide about is the Israeli capital, not you.
Quote:
And then after that it wasn't any more. Honestly. It's like if you own a house, but then you default on your mortgage repayments, the bank repossesses it, then sells it off. You can't come back a few decades later and just repossess it again. The police would have you arrested.
|
We were forced to leave Jerusalem (tough some Jews didn't), and we the Jews came back into the Ottoman empire, that later became the British mandate, and have created and established everything in here by ourselves, and declared independence by ourselves without any help, so we do have the rights to this land.
Quote:
And again, this has to do with nuclear weapons...how, exactly?
|
It has to do with Obama's policies. Obama makes the US lose its friends.
Quote:
You mean, apart from the fact that they are both better off without a war?
|
Without the US, Russia may attack everyone and have full help from the Arabs, and control the US lands. Without Russia, the US may have more land, and will also fully control the world. So both countries might want to start a war, but don't do it because of the nukes.
Quote:
It takes two people to disarm the US and Russia. Why don't you mention Medvedev in any of this? Why is Obama solely to blame?
|
Because he wants the whole Western world to lose its nukes, and, he have decided to do the latest big deal with the nukes, it wasn't Medvedev's idea. Also, I
do think that it is also Medvedev's fault. But mostly Obama's.