Re: United States and Russia agree to new nuclear arms reduction agreement
 

You launch your nukes at me, I launch my biological and chemical weapons at you - we both lose. I go out in a flash of fire, you go out in disease and starvation and widespread collapse of infrastructure. Sure your army might survive - although considering nerve agents are expressely designed to defeat protective measures these days that's debatable - but what are they going to eat, where are they going to get fuel from, or electricity, or wages? Militaries are fairly useless in the long run without a massive civilian infrastructure supporting them.

Nukes were a first strike weapon back in the days when the concept of a first strike still seemed feasable. But the advent of radar, optical sensors, satellites and computers means a first strike is no longer a viable doctrine and with the loss of that doctrine the niche for the nuke died as well.

Re: United States and Russia agree to new nuclear arms reduction agreement
 

I suggest everyone just stop listening to alex to be honest. He has demonstrated a level of hypocrisy far beyond what could ever be "reasonable" in the name of debate.

Alex I refer you to your thread on "respect".

Re: United States and Russia agree to new nuclear arms reduction agreement
 

Actually thats not true, Canada has all the natural resources you need to sustain a country, we could go years without trading, if we weren't invaded.

Thats so retarted I don't even know what to say.

Quoted for truth.

Re: United States and Russia agree to new nuclear arms reduction agreement
 

To say that Canada would become a third world nation overnight is quite a bit of a stretch, but the Canadian economy would be significantly affected by the lack of trade with the United States. Odds are that after a while trade from other countries would increase, although prices for goods may increase slightly due to the transportation costs rising a bit.

Schofield, to say that you have "all the natural resources you need to sustain a country", you're forgetting about the issues of allocation and the workings of a capitalist society (and all of the benefits trading with the outside usually brings to a nation). It isn't enough that you aren't starving, it's having enough so that you don't have to ever worry about being hungry. North Korea has enough resources to exist as a nation, but misuse of those resources results in widespread malnutrition and poverty. How many Canadians are willing to take a significant hit to their quality of life? As much as I like self-sufficiency, it doesn't lend itself well to the nicer things in life.

Re: United States and Russia agree to new nuclear arms reduction agreement
 

I think you're missing my point. America and Russia could HALVE their nuclear weapons stockpiles, hell, knock three quarters of them off the books, and still have plenty of warheads to give the global ecosystem a crippling kick to the gonads at least a couple of times. And even then I doubt if they'd have enough delivery systems to launch them all simultaneously.

Where's the 'risk' here, exactly? Do you think a nasty little renegade country is going to sit there, read the news, and think to themselves, "HA! America can now only wipe out the world ONCE! It is time to invade, for we only fear being completely wiped out FIVE TIMES OR MORE! MWUHAHAAAAA!"

No. They're still going to be fearful of a multimegaton ICBM being rammed straight into their lavish palaces.

Re: United States and Russia agree to new nuclear arms reduction agreement
 

Matt, you ignorant slut! Don't you know that if we reduce our nuclear arsenal this much, we will never have a chance to punch through to the center of the earth in a day? This eliminates any chance of straight-up creating a volcano through the repeated application of nuclear weapons to the same area.

Re: United States and Russia agree to new nuclear arms reduction agreement
 

But I thought that's what thermobaric weapons and space-based mass accelerators were for!

Re: United States and Russia agree to new nuclear arms reduction agreement
 

nah thermobaric weapons are around cause hippies dont like us burning bad guys out of caves the old fashion way...with fire. So now we gotta go hi-tech em into goo nowadays.

Re: United States and Russia agree to new nuclear arms reduction agreement
 

Because burning or suffocating people by shooting napalm into a cave would be cruel. :nodding:

Re: United States and Russia agree to new nuclear arms reduction agreement
 

The point is not the two years in a Muslim school - the point is that he wrote this fact in a book, but lied to the public and said that it didn't happen. The fact that he is lying to America about who he is, proves only that what he tries to hide is the sad truth, and that he cannot be trusted.

And he did said once that he wishes a nuclear-free world. That is one of his democrat liberal (more like socialist) missions.


To be honest; how can I know what my goverment is planning. It sems so obvious that the time to attack is now, that it has already became a joke in the Israeli society about why doesn't the goverment to anything. We just wait.

And we have enough balls (we attack Iraq and Syria once), it's just that we have a lot of pressure on us, from the world, and from the Iran-Syria-Turkey-Hezbollah's direction. "We don't don't attack - we don't have balls. We attack - we are war criminals." That's pretty much the world's policy about us.

Other than what I've said above, no one has gave any real explanation to why this person is an anti-Israeli pro-Arab president. Crazyness? May be. Islamism? Certainly. And his "Church" is anti-Semitic. He never left it. Know why? Because he agrees with it. He loves his anti-Semitic priest (who denies the holocaust, like his obviously good friend, Ahmedinjad), because he gives the legitimacy to anti-Semitic statments. Obama can never be a friend of Israel, or any other self-respecting Jewish society.

I have already answered the first statment, and as for the question, you should know that he has roots in Arab countries. But his Arab blood is not as important as his Islamic ideology. As mch as race effects people, ideology and religion effect even more. And before you all turn on your racist alert (it's probably too late), I should tell you that Obama himself (we're talking about the president of the US, remember?) is extrimely racist. Because of his Church. His priest is extrimely anti-Jewish and anti-White person. Both Obama and his priest are "black racists" - an ideology that prefers the blacks over the whites. They both are as bad as the KKK.

I hate Obama so much, and I told you many reasosn, I want to say something that I am not allowed to say about him. So I will just think it, and you all will have to guess what it is. Seriously tough, his policies are very harmful.

One may completely lose. A WWIII. If the US wins (and it will, if this will happen), we can say everything is good. But if not, both Russia and the oil countries (mostly Arab countries, though others too) will control this world. Until there will be left no oil and everything will gone back to 3world countries. Because the no-oil technologies are in the hands of the West. No West + no oil = the end of human civilization, as we know it.

Israel is in danger, allways. Israel doesn't want to use the nuclear weapons. The world has recognized Israel's right to have nuclear weapons. You can't compare this to Iran and NK, you simply can't.

And NK may not invade anyone, but you don't want them to have nukes, this is very dangerous.

I blame Obama for not stopping this proccess, and for trying to give more legitimacy to this process. He just tries to have a Western world with no nukes. More than any other president. So you should expect that the world won't like it.

And if Russia destroys the US, it will control everything. Until the end of the human civilization, as I already said. My country, Israel, the "the US' best friend", has the technologies to have a world with no oil, so we will stop giving money to the Arab Muslim terror-supporter countries. With no US or Israel, the world will still eat the Arabs' oil until it will end, then the world will be left with no energy. By not being dependent on oil, you actually save Earth. Israel (and, eventually, the US) has the technologies for that, so you should think about it next time you scream "boycot Israel blah blah blah!!!".

The left-wingers choose to listen to Obam and the EU. I guess they hate Israel, their only homeland.
It's the work of Ehud Barak, if not him, Iran's nuclear factories were gone long time ago.


It is relevant, because personal ideology is relevant. You're question isn't smart at all, honestly.

Why? What does building in our capital has to do with the peace process? We have every right to build in Jerusalem. The world wants my city Tel - Aviv to be the capital, but ALL OF US disagree. Because 3000+ years old Jerusalem is ours. Remember 1967? Jordan? Jordan attacked, Jordan lost. And Jordan doesn't want it back (and even if they do, they don't have the right, because they started the war, but anyway, they don't want it back,). It has nothing to do with the piss (not peace, but piss) process with the Palestinians. And yes, it is piss process, because it's like a 3D movie, it's so close, you can actually think that it's real, even if it's not at all.

The Indians hate Obama's support towards Afganistan.

The thing is not their ability to destroy Earth, it's just that with no nuclear weapons, nothing will stop a war between the US and Russia. And I say "no nuclear weapons", because this is Obama's mission. You don't take risks with WWs. At least, you should not take such risks, especially if you're the US president.