![]() |
Re: United States and Russia agree to new nuclear arms reduction agreement Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
And your second to last sentence doesn't make sense. Quote:
Also: 1) Barack Obama is not Muslim. 2) Barack Obama is not Arab. 3) I very much doubt Barack Obama is anti-Zionist. 4) I very much doubt Barack Obama is anti-Israeli, seeing as his vice-president visited your country. Of course, his view may have changed when your Prime Minister so crudely insulted Joe Biden. 5) In another world war, likely if America went to war the rest of Nato would go to war with it. That's how it becomes a WORLD war. 6) How is it possible to love terror? 7) Supporting Afghanistan has nothing to do with the Palestinian-Israeli conflict, except in possibly the most marginal, irrelevant sense possible. Nor does it have anything to do with reducing the US' nuclear stockpile. 8) I imagine that if the US suddenly disappeared off the face of the Earth, Canada would suffer pretty bad. After all, the US and Canada only form the largest trading partnership in the world. Nothing to worry about, right? |
Re: United States and Russia agree to new nuclear arms reduction agreement Quote:
Quote:
By destroying thousands of nuclear weapons, both sides can now put the money they would be spending on maintaining those weapons on many thousands more conventional weapons. |
Re: United States and Russia agree to new nuclear arms reduction agreement Quote:
Why have that many? You only need to wipe out all life on Earth just the once. Any more than that would be quite redundant. It's a remnant of the cold war and nothing more. Nukes cost money not only to build, but to safely store and maintain them. They could save quite a lot of money if they decommissioned a few thousand of the things, and just save enough for the one mass extinction. It's quite a logical way of saving moolah if you ask me, and you'll still be able to wave around the multi-megaton-phallic-tube-of-death if you need to calm down some upstart renegade country in the future. |
Re: United States and Russia agree to new nuclear arms reduction agreement Quote:
Also, for now, these are not all of the nuclear rockets, but Obama said that he want the whole world (the Western world, he doesn't care about Iran) to be "free of nukes". Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: United States and Russia agree to new nuclear arms reduction agreement Quote:
I also want some sauce on where Obama said he wants to get rid of all nuclear weapons. Quote:
|
Re: United States and Russia agree to new nuclear arms reduction agreement He describes his father as "raised a Muslim", but a "confirmed atheist" by the time his parents met, and his stepfather as "a man who saw religion as not particularly useful". Obama explained how, through working with black churches as a community organizer while in his twenties, he came to understand "the power of the African-American religious tradition to spur social change". He was baptized at the Trinity United Church of Christ in 1988 and was an active member there for two decades. Hes no Muslim. |
Re: United States and Russia agree to new nuclear arms reduction agreement ICBMs were what kept the cold war cold, not nukes. |
Re: United States and Russia agree to new nuclear arms reduction agreement Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
1) Israel won't disclose the extent of it's nuclear weapons program. In fact, Israel won't even publicly admit it has nuclear weapons. 2)Israel has not signed the Nuclear Non-proliferation treaty. Given those 2 points, I have to say that whatever your intentions, you're not expressing them very well. At least North Korea is willing to admit that it's developing nuclear weapons. Oh, and also, I doubt North Korea would invade someone other than South Korea any time soon. They have a very large army, but I doubt it can project force any further than the Korean peninsula. Quote:
And I highly doubt that everyone is afraid of Russia because of nuclear weapons. Russia has very large natural resource reserves, which they leverage. That is why they are powerful. They won't really be better off by attacking the USA. Ever. Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: United States and Russia agree to new nuclear arms reduction agreement Nuclear control should not be a significant issue we have better weapons than nukes now. I can hit a city with a biological or chemical warhead and cause problems for the target on the same magnitude as a nuclear weapon without causing damage to the physical infrastructure. And those chemical or biological weapons are much cheaper than a nuke, won't cause the same problems with radiation as a nuke, and are much easier to get a hold of. The reason politicians talk about nuclear proliferation is because nukes are relatively easy to control; make the population fixate on one thing and lose track of the fact that the delivery system - the missile - is the more dangerous development. That the ease with which you can get a missile is greatly increased by the spread of computers and so on. Once you have a reasonably accurate ICBM it ultimately doesn't matter whether you have a nuke or not, there are other weapons on the NBC spectrum that are just as nasty. So we have nuclear arms reduction but is it because we're becoming all fluffy or just because there's better stuff to spend our money on these days than a deterent that was out of date twenty years ago.... |
Re: United States and Russia agree to new nuclear arms reduction agreement Quote:
|
| All times are GMT -7. |
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2016, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.0 ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.