FileFront Gaming Forums

Pot.

This is a discussion on Pot. within the The Pub forums, part of the General Chit-Chat category; Originally Posted by Admiral Donutz even caffeine could be classified as a drug. true dat....

The Pub Intelligent discussion and debate on real-life issues. You can also visit the History and Warfare forum | This is not a game support forum.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #31  
Old 4 Weeks Ago
Orchidea's Avatar
Concentrate on the NOW.
 
Join Date: September 18th, 2008
Location: Finland
Posts: 265
Rep Power: 0
Orchidea should make some friends
Default Re: Pot.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Admiral Donutz View Post
even caffeine could be classified as a drug.
true dat.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 4 Weeks Ago
NiteStryker's Avatar
...Like a boss
 
Join Date: April 24th, 2003
Location: America's Finest City
Posts: 10,455
Rep Power: 25
NiteStryker is worthy of your admirationNiteStryker is worthy of your admirationNiteStryker is worthy of your admirationNiteStryker is worthy of your admirationNiteStryker is worthy of your admirationNiteStryker is worthy of your admirationNiteStryker is worthy of your admirationNiteStryker is worthy of your admirationNiteStryker is worthy of your admiration
Default Re: Pot.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr. Matt View Post
police seem reasonably good at detecting stoned people without the use of breathalysers at the moment.
But the issue is proof in a courtroom. You can subject an individual to a breathalyzer and video the number at the moment. Above .08 and you are done. But for pot? There is no solid proof other than the smell. A cop could run with that.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr. Pedantic View Post
The reason I said it's an interesting point of view is that I'd have expected you to want to ban alcohol as well, instead of legalizing marijuana.
We tried that once, didnt work out too well.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr. Pedantic View Post
Because if you're going with the health side, which is the only side your argument makes sense from, wouldn't it be much more favourable to ban both, rather than legalize both?
No because you would create a whole alcohol underground industry.
__________________


Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 4 Weeks Ago
Afterburner's Avatar
Hakkaa Paalle!*cut them down!*
 
Join Date: June 1st, 2005
Location: The Mitten
Posts: 6,573
Rep Power: 18
Afterburner is addicted to GFAfterburner is addicted to GFAfterburner is addicted to GFAfterburner is addicted to GFAfterburner is addicted to GFAfterburner is addicted to GFAfterburner is addicted to GFAfterburner is addicted to GFAfterburner is addicted to GFAfterburner is addicted to GFAfterburner is addicted to GF
Send a message via AIM to Afterburner Send a message via Yahoo to Afterburner
Default Re: Pot.

Well what is the fastest way to test for marijuana? Urine testing? You'd probably have to provide some kind of way for cops to get a speedier warrant for urine testing on people suspected of smoking and driving.
__________________

Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 4 Weeks Ago
Mr. Pedantic's Avatar
Bored
 
Join Date: October 7th, 2006
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 8,862
Rep Power: 16
Mr. Pedantic is a person of good adviceMr. Pedantic is a person of good adviceMr. Pedantic is a person of good adviceMr. Pedantic is a person of good adviceMr. Pedantic is a person of good adviceMr. Pedantic is a person of good adviceMr. Pedantic is a person of good adviceMr. Pedantic is a person of good adviceMr. Pedantic is a person of good adviceMr. Pedantic is a person of good adviceMr. Pedantic is a person of good advice
Default Re: Pot.

Quote:
We tried that once, didnt work out too well.
I doubt legalizing marijuana would work too well either.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 4 Weeks Ago
Street Legal
 
Join Date: July 17th, 2008
Location: between two ferns
Posts: 743
Rep Power: 3
Professor Dr. Scientist - an example to followProfessor Dr. Scientist - an example to followProfessor Dr. Scientist - an example to followProfessor Dr. Scientist - an example to followProfessor Dr. Scientist - an example to followProfessor Dr. Scientist - an example to followProfessor Dr. Scientist - an example to followProfessor Dr. Scientist - an example to follow
Default Re: Pot.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Orchidea View Post
true dat.
Spoiler:
__________________
My lab coat has leather elbow patches.
Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old 4 Weeks Ago
noobst3R's Avatar
Black Knight of Filefront
 
Join Date: June 16th, 2008
Location: Counting Greame's stair
Posts: 496
Rep Power: 3
noobst3R is worthy of recognitionnoobst3R is worthy of recognitionnoobst3R is worthy of recognitionnoobst3R is worthy of recognitionnoobst3R is worthy of recognitionnoobst3R is worthy of recognition
Default Re: Pot.

The LSD web looks pretty good.

Although, I think the spider isn't effected by LSD. p
__________________

Intel e5200 (OCZ Vendetta)- Crucial 1066Mhz 2GB - GTS250 mofo at 822Mhz Engine / 2300Mhz Memory / 2000Mhz Shader- Gpu-z - Corsair 400cx - Asus P5KPL-AM
Reply With Quote
  #37  
Old 4 Weeks Ago
Nemmerle's Avatar
Resident naysmith
The Colorful Super Moderators
 
Join Date: May 26th, 2003
Location: Scotland
Posts: 11,047
Rep Power: 28
Nemmerle is often praisedNemmerle is often praisedNemmerle is often praisedNemmerle is often praisedNemmerle is often praisedNemmerle is often praisedNemmerle is often praisedNemmerle is often praisedNemmerle is often praisedNemmerle is often praisedNemmerle is often praised
Default Re: Pot.

Quote:
Originally Posted by NiteStryker View Post
But the issue is proof in a courtroom. You can subject an individual to a breathalyzer and video the number at the moment. Above .08 and you are done. But for pot? There is no solid proof other than the smell. A cop could run with that.
A breathalyser is just a very specific type of gas analyser. There are more general types that cover a range of applications from alcohol all the way through to bomb detection. I see no reason why you couldn't construct a device to test for pot as well.
__________________
‘Tell the blunt, honest truth in the starkest, darkest way. And what will be, will be. What will be should be. And everyone else is a coward.'

- House M.D., season two, episode 24 ‘No Reason’
Reply With Quote
  #38  
Old 4 Weeks Ago
Mephistopheles's Avatar
⇄⇄⇄ | Saint Vertigo | ⇄⇄⇄
 
Join Date: December 27th, 2004
Location: Northern Krautland, EUtopia
Posts: 1,902
Rep Power: 12
Mephistopheles is worthy of your admirationMephistopheles is worthy of your admirationMephistopheles is worthy of your admirationMephistopheles is worthy of your admirationMephistopheles is worthy of your admirationMephistopheles is worthy of your admirationMephistopheles is worthy of your admirationMephistopheles is worthy of your admiration
exclaim Re: Pot.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr. Matt View Post
You don't really need one. If someone's been smoking marijuana recently enough for it to have an impact on their driving, particularly if they've been doing it in their car, the stench would be sufficient to give them away. People say cigarettes smell, but holy hell, cheeky cigs beat them in terms of strength. I suppose there are ways of getting around even that, but police seem reasonably good at detecting stoned people without the use of breathalysers at the moment.
Quote:
Originally Posted by NiteStryker View Post
But the issue is proof in a courtroom. You can subject an individual to a breathalyzer
and video the number at the moment. Above .08 and you are done. But for pot? There is no solid proof other than
the smell. A cop could run with that.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Afterburner View Post
Well what is the fastest way to test for marijuana? Urine testing? You'd probably have to provide some kind of way for cops to get a speedier warrant for urine testing on people suspected of smoking and driving.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nemmerle View Post
A breathalyser is just a very specific type of gas analyser. There are more general types that cover a range of applications from alcohol all the way through to bomb detection. I see no reason why you couldn't construct a device to test for pot as well.
The lack of a drug detection method for substances like Cannabis, Opiates, Cocaine and Amphetamines had been a problem for German police officers in the past. Taking a blood sample is required as evidence in a court.
But this is always a severe police measure. If it turns out negative the police officer could be sued for personal injury. So if an officer is uncertain he will probably not take a blood sample.

The breathalyser test for drunk people is an important instrument for the police to justify taking a blood sample.
Fortunately, (meanwhile) there is also a common drug testing method for police officers in Germany as well. It is called "DrugWipe". You can use it by simply touching the skin of a suspect.

DrugWipe is produced by the Securetec Detektions Systeme AG in Germany. There are probably other companies with drugwipe tests (Drogenwischtests) on the market as well.

Quote:
Originally Posted by DrugWipe 5 Info

DrugWipe®5 for rapid detection of drugs in body fluids (sweat, saliva) and on surfaces.

DrugWipe®5 - simultaneous detection for
o Opiates
o Cocaine
o Amphetamines/Methamphetamines (Ecstasy)
o Cannabis

Usage
DrugWipe®5 was designed to detect invisible (nanogramme) residues of drugs.

The test is very easy to handle.

Application
o Customs and drug enforcement
o Traffic police
o Prisons
o Workplace
And many more

High detection reliability
Highest sensitivity due to highly specific antibodies.

Test duration
Approx. 3-10 minutes

Low detection limit

20-300 Nanogramm/ml (saliva, sweat)
2 - 50 Nanogramm/cm˛ (surfaces)

Notice:

DrugWipe® 5 rapid tests are higly accurate screening tests and are designed for direct use during investigations and controls in order to detect possible illegal drugs or to confirm initial suspicions. Final identification of suspicious substances will require laboratory analysis.
Source: Securetec Detektions-Systeme AG / Products / Drugwipe 5

About legalising Cannabis: I could accept it.
Over here, consumers of small amounts of Cannabis are already not prosecuted anymore (as long as they are not driving stoned).

__________________



Last edited by Mephistopheles; 4 Weeks Ago at 01:51 AM..
Reply With Quote
  #39  
Old 4 Weeks Ago
NiteStryker's Avatar
...Like a boss
 
Join Date: April 24th, 2003
Location: America's Finest City
Posts: 10,455
Rep Power: 25
NiteStryker is worthy of your admirationNiteStryker is worthy of your admirationNiteStryker is worthy of your admirationNiteStryker is worthy of your admirationNiteStryker is worthy of your admirationNiteStryker is worthy of your admirationNiteStryker is worthy of your admirationNiteStryker is worthy of your admirationNiteStryker is worthy of your admiration
Default Re: Pot.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Afterburner View Post
Well what is the fastest way to test for marijuana? Urine testing? You'd probably have to provide some kind of way for cops to get a speedier warrant for urine testing on people suspected of smoking and driving.
Yea Urine tests would be good. Make them drink water. And then collect a sample. They would have to do the results fairly quickly tho.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr. Pedantic View Post
I doubt legalizing marijuana would work too well either.
Well if you are going to have alcohol legal then by an extension, how can you ban marijuana? Its like banning knives but you can have guns.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nemmerle View Post
I see no reason why you couldn't construct a device to test for pot as well.
That would be great.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mephistopheles View Post
DrugWipe is produced by the Securetec Detektions Systeme AG in Germany. There are probably other companies with drugwipe tests (Drogenwischtests) on the market as well.
Those would be awesome if they were approved by our FDA and are recognized in a courtroom.
__________________


Reply With Quote
  #40  
Old 4 Weeks Ago
Mephistopheles's Avatar
⇄⇄⇄ | Saint Vertigo | ⇄⇄⇄
 
Join Date: December 27th, 2004
Location: Northern Krautland, EUtopia
Posts: 1,902
Rep Power: 12
Mephistopheles is worthy of your admirationMephistopheles is worthy of your admirationMephistopheles is worthy of your admirationMephistopheles is worthy of your admirationMephistopheles is worthy of your admirationMephistopheles is worthy of your admirationMephistopheles is worthy of your admirationMephistopheles is worthy of your admiration
exclaim Re: Pot.

Quote:
Originally Posted by NiteStryker View Post
Yea Urine tests would be good. Make them drink water. And then collect a sample. They would have to do the results fairly quickly tho.
Urine tests are not as accurate as blood tests to determine the exact amount of a substance in the body of a suspect at a given time.
A police officer also isn't allowed to force a suspect to drink water and wait until the person needs to see the toiled - that's regarded as torture and is therefore illegal.
Quote:
Originally Posted by NiteStryker View Post
Those would be awesome if they were approved by our FDA and are recognized in a courtroom.
I think that wouldn't be a problem, nevertheless they are just indicators like the breathalyser test to justify taking a blood sample as "solid evidence".
I suppose drugwipe tests are already used in some US states.

Over here, the breathalyser test alone is only a valid option for infractions like driving with a BAC (blood alcohol content / concentration) < 1.1 o/oo,
presuming that the suspect cooperates and accepts the second (more accurate "next generation") breathalyser test in the police station.

Causing an accident with a BAC < 1.1 o/oo is also considered a crime (in most cases) and requires a lab analysis of the suspect's blood sample.
Of course, the blood sample is taken by a doctor, the police officer is responsible for ordering the measure.
__________________



Last edited by Mephistopheles; 4 Weeks Ago at 01:53 AM..
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -7.