There is a difference though, between what I am trying to say, and how you're interpreting my post.
For our current state of evolution, and to live as we're commonly doing, we need to cut down tree's, and we need to burn oil, and we need to build houses. However, as an example, why litter when you can simply put rubbish in a bin? The amount of people I've seen littering when there has been a perfectly good bin not ten feet away is ridiculous.
If we did that what would street cleaners do for a living?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Aerilon
The same could be said for the tree's that we cut down. There was this documentary on TV the other week, about some island that people were going too for the tree's. Instead of starting at the edge, the decided to start cutting down the tree's right in the middle, thus cutting off the wildlife there. If they had to cut down those specific tree's they could have at least started at the edge, then worked their way through.
I find it hard to believe that cutting down the trees in the middle cut off some stream of wildlife that wouldn't have been cut off cutting down a similar number of trees at the edge. And as I find it hard to believe, even if it's true, it seems likely that the people doing so would also.
Not being a person involved in the tree cutting business it's also possible that they actually had a reason for starting in the centre.
Africa and so on are only a problem if you care. Solution: stop caring.
A sunbeam came down from on high and suddenly all was right with the world.
It's true. The world is a much better place when I just pretend Africa doesn't exist. Though I can't do that for too long, I'm too nice to just ignore it, but not nice enough to do anything about it (yet.)
You want to ease the burden on the planet? I offer you a solution. Sometimes doing the right thing, isnt doing the right thing.
Thus creating a further strain on the planet as we look for MORE resources, right?
Hence the "nuke" part. Or other equivalent destructive methods.
K. However the radioactive fallout of just one bomb will contaminate at least one continent depending on where it's detonated. Violence is never the answer. You only perpetuate intolerance doing so.
Quote:
You are going to walk over to Africa and tell people who speak in clicks to only have one child? Let me know when you do this, I want to come with you and laugh my ass off.
I think its a great idea, but you would never be able to even communicate such an idea, let alone enforce it.
A better idea, how about we do that right here in the US and try to convince those religious nutjobs that having 20 kids isn't a good thing simply because the vagina can pump them out. I wish they were more rare then they really are.
Jeff "n0e" Mills Site Manager, GameFront.com
Community Manager, The Escapist
------------ For all GameFront related support please click here. | Please do not send direct emails or private messages asking me for help.
K. However the radioactive fallout of just one bomb will contaminate at least one continent depending on where it's detonated.
So use a chemical weapon instead.
Quote:
Originally Posted by n0e
Violence is never the answer.
It may not be the answer you like but it's certainly an answer. Those who disagree should conjure up the ghosts of the civilisations who did not and for whom the matter was resolved.
Quote:
Originally Posted by n0e
You only perpetuate intolerance doing so.
If Nitestryker really was about to launch his genocide campaign are you telling me you'd tolerate him? That, even believing it's wrong, you wouldn't kill him if given the option?
Our society is fucked up because of this ideology of not fighting for what you believe in. Tolerate everyone, violence never solved anything; the old self-interested clichés. Some things shouldn't be tolerated; some things are worth killing and dying over.
You can be sure if you’re not prepared to do the killing to reach an end you desire someone else, probably someone not as nice as you, will do it to reach the end they desire; either with economics in the case of more developed nations or with physical weapons in the case of internal rivalries; hence the state of Africa today.
Our society is fucked up because of this ideology of not fighting for what you believe in. Tolerate everyone, violence never solved anything; the old self-interested clichés. Some things shouldn't be tolerated; some things are worth killing and dying over. .
Well i suppose you are right that there are things worth fighting for but killing and dying is a bit harsh I would say. Killing for land and resources and dying for lets say religion really is not worth it, actualy thats just a sad waste of a life that could bring happines to an other persons.
When someone gets greedy none should suffer for it. Defending and fighting for whats yours,family etc yes but none should be above another.
And people could switch their lights off and not stay in the shower fo 30min and use 'green'product. hmm maybe climat changes and the A.I:s taking over the world is not just because we are arrogant basterds but Greedy basterds.
This site is part of the Defy Media Gaming network
The best serving of video game culture, since 2001. Whether you're looking for news, reviews, walkthroughs, or the biggest collection of PC gaming files on the planet, Game Front has you covered. We also make no illusions about gaming: it's supposed to be fun. Browse gaming galleries, humor lists, and honest, short-form reporting. Game on!
The Pub 
Re: Arrogance 
Jeff "n0e" Mills 
Linear Mode
