FileFront Forums
Page 4 of 5 « First 23 4 5
Show 50 post(s) from this thread on one page

FileFront Forums (http://forums.filefront.com/)
-   The Pub (http://forums.filefront.com/pub-578/)
-   -   Air Force One photo-op (http://forums.filefront.com/pub/398081-air-force-one-photo-op.html)

Miltonmonkey April 29th, 2009 08:24 PM
Re: Air Force One photo-op
 
Well for all of this shit, can we at least see the photos that they took?

Primarch Vulkan April 29th, 2009 11:15 PM
Re: Air Force One photo-op
 
same here man, I wanna see the photos as well.

NiteStryker April 30th, 2009 05:39 PM
Re: Air Force One photo-op
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Smitty025 (Post 4877022)
Well, technically it was not Air Force One, as the President was not on it. That also reduces its value as a target.
Ok well technically my comment still stands, and the goddamn plane says United States of America on it and its the only boeing in existance (except for the 3 additional Air Force Ones). So, its a teenager taking his parents badass vehicle out for a joyride.

Stratopwn3r April 30th, 2009 06:01 PM
Re: Air Force One photo-op
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by NiteStryker (Post 4878521)
Ok well technically my comment still stands, and the goddamn plane says United States of America on it and its the only boeing in existance (except for the 3 additional Air Force Ones). So, its a teenager taking his parents badass vehicle out for a joyride.
No, it's a teenager taking his parents badass vehicle out to bring from the summer house to the real house and taking pictures on the way home.

Smitty025 April 30th, 2009 07:47 PM
Re: Air Force One photo-op
 
http://cache.gawker.com/assets/image...7275_plane.jpg


This was submitted as part of a Daily News Photoshop contest.

Admiral Donutz May 1st, 2009 12:32 AM
Re: Air Force One photo-op
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Anlushac11 (Post 4877725)
For some reason the info had a note attached that said do not release this info to the public, which was unusual.
Mire like "silly".

I do like their excuse that the flight was planned anyway and they combined them to save money, good on them. Though we can argue that withoutout photoop they could havew saved some more money (that and there always is an other excercise in the pipeline but meh). Atleast they tried to save (some) money.

NiteStryker May 1st, 2009 03:08 PM
Re: Air Force One photo-op
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Anlushac11 (Post 4877725)
For some reason the info had a note attached that said do not release this info to the public, which was unusual.
They really dont like the public to know exactly where and when the presidential plane will be flying danger low and danger stupid. Makes for a easy target of opportunity.

Admiral Donutz May 1st, 2009 03:32 PM
Re: Air Force One photo-op
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by NiteStryker (Post 4879403)
They really dont like the public to know exactly where and when the presidential plane will be flying danger low and danger stupid. Makes for a easy target of opportunity.
A rather pointless target though, it would be "just the plane (and crew)". Not something really something that makes an appealing target (not more of a target the trying to attack any plane approaching or leaving any airfield when it's flying low aswell, hell those might be even better targets since they ain't "empty")...

NiteStryker May 1st, 2009 04:24 PM
Re: Air Force One photo-op
 
Well, first off, you dont know if the president is in there or not, and second, there is quite a bit of symbolism (and destruction) that would happen for blowing up Air Force One.

Crazy Wolf May 1st, 2009 04:38 PM
Re: Air Force One photo-op
 
Plus, a large piece of machinery with a whole bunch of fuel flying over a city could turn into a very potent weapon if it was unable to steer out of the way of several very large, very expensive, very densely populated skyscrapers.


All times are GMT -7.
Page 4 of 5 « First 23 4 5
Show 50 post(s) from this thread on one page

Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2016, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.0 ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.