Agreed, I easily could write a book about lets say the ecominc crisis, and how the flying spaghetti monster caused all of it or whatever :lol:
"...and his noodley appendage touched homes and the residents could no longer afford the higher payments."
Quote:
How am I using the Bible to prove its truth? The Bible is a factual book. As I have said, it proved many scientific and historical evidences, before they were even discovered or proven by Secular scholars. How does that dissaprove the Bibles accuracy?
There are several plot holes in the bible. There is no record by the Romans that a man named Jesus was put to death by nailing him to a cross. There is no evidence to support the idea that the earth in only 6000 years old.
The places may match up, but the evidence does not match. I can go and read most books today and the settings are in real world places, however the events depicted in the books never happened in that place.
The bible is also heavily edited by the church. It is assumed that 1/2 the bible has been edited out and lost to time. How do we know that the events in the bible are truth and not just and edit by the pope back in the middle ages.
There are several plot holes in the bible. There is no record by the Romans that a man named Jesus was put to death by nailing him to a cross. There is no evidence to support the idea that the earth in only 6000 years old.
As said before, its only a matter of time until those are proven. And those are just two holes, unlike the many which have been proven
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pethegreat
The places may match up, but the evidence does not match. I can go and read most books today and the settings are in real world places, however the events depicted in the books never happened in that place.
Except the characters in the Bible are not fictional characters. As I said, there are now 25,000 archeological sites that historically support over 25,000 biblical people, places, and events.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pethegreat
The bible is also heavily edited by the church. It is assumed that 1/2 the bible has been edited out and lost to time. How do we know that the events in the bible are truth and not just and edit by the pope back in the middle ages.
As said before, its only a matter of time until those are proven. And those are just two holes, unlike the many which have been proven
That is the biggest hole in the bible. The only account of Jesus getting killed and coming back to life(which is scientifically possible) is in the bible. Any evidence supporting the bible's account does not have a clear history and the church has meddled with the evidence.
Quote:
Except the characters in the Bible are not fictional characters. As I said, there are now 25,000 archeological sites that historically support over 25,000 biblical people, places, and events.
However none of the miracles depicted the in the bible have been proven to ever have occurred.
All other religions have a fairy-tale book that points out that, that, that and that happened and there was this, this, this, and this, and there was Jesus, Muhammad, Buddha or wtf ever, and god, Allah, and all that stuff.
They all point out stuff that did happen, so why not both worship God, Allah, Buddha, and Hindu gods?
I think I am going to write a story book about the cookie monster and the flying spaghetti monster, with places, historic sites being true, and presto chango!
My own religion! I am going to call it, Monsterism
Allah is god. Judaism, Christianity, and Islamic are all worship the same god, they just have several differences, Jews don't believe Christ is the saviour, Islam believes that the Christian Church is corrupt and they follow the prophet Mohamed
Okay guys, we're getting off topic, save this for religous discussion and talk about the dumbshits walking around
Believe it or not, sheep are needed for human survival
hahaha ? WhAt ? ppfftt
Gotta be kiddin right ?
BaaaaaaaaaaAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAaa !
Yea l swear l just read all the same stuff in the other thread ! LOL !
There are the really cluey ones that can actually understand science and its complexities.
And there and some not quite so cluey ones that can follow science close but dont quite understand it.
And theres some that are plain lazy to knowledge, ignorant to learning, lazy to learning, theres the type that could give a shit about any of it.
And theres the not so bright, just below average ones, that tend to be mostly followers. Like sheep to a slaughter.
Then theres the really poorly educated.
The plain dumb.
The mentally retarded.
There are the really cluey ones that can actually understand science and its complexities.
And there and some not quite so cluey ones that can follow science close but dont quite understand it.
And theres some that are plain lazy to knowledge, ignorant to learning, lazy to learning, theres the type that could give a shit about any of it.
And theres the not so bright, just below average ones, that tend to be mostly followers. Like sheep to a slaughter.
Then theres the really poorly educated.
The plain dumb.
The mentally retarded.
This site is part of the Defy Media Gaming network
The best serving of video game culture, since 2001. Whether you're looking for news, reviews, walkthroughs, or the biggest collection of PC gaming files on the planet, Game Front has you covered. We also make no illusions about gaming: it's supposed to be fun. Browse gaming galleries, humor lists, and honest, short-form reporting. Game on!
The Pub 
Re: How can people be so stupid? 
.gif "Roll Eyes (Sarcastic) at that stupid method of spelling color")
Linear Mode
