Notices

Go Back   FileFront Forums > Main Forums > The Pub

Remember Me?

The Pub
Intelligent discussion and debate on real-life issues. | This is not a game support forum.
You can also visit the History and Warfare forum

View Poll Results: Who should be allowed to strike?
All workers, regardless of job, have the right to strike 26 65.00%
Essential workers (police, military, doctors) should be barred from striking 13 32.50%
Noone should have the right to strike 1 2.50%
Voters: 40. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
4351343
Re: Right to strike?
Joe Bonham
May 20th, 2008 07:29 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nemmerle View Post
The same argument can be made concerning the revenue lost in any strike.
True, but truckers or Walmart employees going on to harm anyone.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Marsoe
In that case though, it's the fault of the hospital (or in our case District Health Boards), the doctors don't get to decide their own wages.
Yes, but the doctors have the choice of how to respond.
4351349
Re: Right to strike?
masked_marsoe
May 20th, 2008 07:38 PM
Quote:
Yes, but the doctors have the choice of how to respond.
Indeed, and a strike is never a first resort.
4351358
Re: Right to strike?
Quetron
May 20th, 2008 07:50 PM
You oculd hold a stike to lets say geting a holiday or 40 hour workweeks (not 60,80 100), but since they go off and want $35 bucks an hour, and every benifet known, then NO !!!!!

picked B

I can't see ANY reason a doctor would EVER go on strike, don't make sense at all, or are you talking about gov run healthcare.
4351453
Re: Right to strike?
Kwould
May 20th, 2008 10:42 PM
In the US, there are labor laws in place to discourage union strikes over wage related disputes. However, those same laws protect workers from lockouts and other such corporate retaliations when the labor dispute is non-monetary in nature.

I'd have to agree with Relander and Tas. While no person or union should be barred from striking altogether, essential service workers should have restrictions in place; most responsible unions would agree with this. That said, it is rare (at least in the states) to see doctors strike, while it is far more common to see nurses and other healthcare support staff do so.
4351459
Re: Right to strike?
Quetron
May 20th, 2008 11:00 PM
Unions are voted in by the employees, I don't think other countries do that, not sure.But my moms last boss said "if there is any talk of a union I will close the place down.

My dad worked for a place, tool and die, he was there for about 3 months, they voted in a union, BOOM they just closed and left my dad looking for another job.

but nowdays, all they do is move the factory to China, yay unions.
One plant here went on strike for 2 , 3 months now, it forced GM to close a pile of places, they made a bargain, if they pay the union 200,000,000$ they would agree to go back to work.But in the meantime piles of other people had to collect union paychecks or find another job.
ONE factory caused the problem and affected thousands of people.

They also have a new thing nowdays too.Since the company can't afford to pay all these high wages they are offering buyouts, like 100,000$ for the workers to retire, or just leave.

Hell ya nothing like strong arming your boss and exspect them to be nice, the unions go way too far and now we pay the price.It's not all corperate greed, a lot of people have the exact same greed, and money don't grow on trees.
4352206
Re: Right to strike?
WiseBobo
May 21st, 2008 01:51 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Quetron View Post
Hell ya nothing like strong arming your boss and exspect them to be nice, the unions go way too far and now we pay the price.It's not all corperate greed, a lot of people have the exact same greed, and money don't grow on trees.
Money may not grow on trees but the slave labor still being used is just as abundant then as it is now. Business screwed your Dad over (that and a lack of protectionism in the third world), not his union.
4352217
Re: Right to strike?
Serio
May 21st, 2008 02:01 PM
I would laugh so hard, if all of Americas military forces went on strike, just as World War 3 initiates. That would be... pretty bad. Everyone but essential i think.
4352347
Re: Right to strike?
Quetron
May 21st, 2008 03:19 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by WiseBobo View Post
Money may not grow on trees but the slave labor still being used is just as abundant then as it is now. Business screwed your Dad over (that and a lack of protectionism in the third world), not his union.

Well he started before the union was voted in, but another place he worked at he said you can take your union dues, but I will not be a part of the union.

People think the union is for the worker, but people don't understand how exspensive and time consuming hiring an employee is.The way it is done is you get cash they get service, the more they sell the more each makes.

but since unions strong arm a company what happens is special groups of people get paid more than what they should.Then everybody suffers from high prices all because some greedy people are getting more than they are worth.
Then the company rather than just selling stuff and creating work, it becomes an ,us against them.Then the employer becomes gun shy and yes a union has to strong arm them to FORCE what they want.

It's not the day of the sweatshops, which was a good reason to form unions, nowdays it just screws up everything for the employers, employees, and the customers.
4352498
Re: Right to strike?
Nemmerle
May 21st, 2008 05:41 PM
In the days America wrote the Capitalist Manifesto (great book by the way, go read it! ^_^ ) working conditions were better than they are today and the working week was much shorter.
We've walked forwards with companies taking more and more and what reward have we been allowed for it? The dollar now is worth to the average middle class man in America around 4 cents of the worth of the old dollar when congress created the Federal Reserve. You speak of unions strong arming companies but unions have allowed companies an awful lot of slack in the things they have taken and the common man sees awful little in return for this other than the value of his savings ever degrading as government creates more money out of nowhere dilluting the power of his currency and grants this money into the pockets of big business displacing his profits into the hands of a few elite.
It's time the unions grew some balls and stopped letting themselves be pushed around more than anything else.
4352745
Re: Right to strike?
Joe Bonham
May 22nd, 2008 12:16 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by masked_marsoe View Post
Indeed, and a strike is never a first resort.
But would it be moral to risk physical harm to innocent people because you have a pay problem?
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Capital Strike 2.0 and Capital Strike 2 Cross Canyon mod help Nazgul957156 SW:BF2 Problems, Errors and Help 2 August 20th, 2007 07:48 PM


All times are GMT -7.







   
 





This site is part of the Defy Media Gaming network

The best serving of video game culture, since 2001. Whether you're looking for news, reviews, walkthroughs, or the biggest collection of PC gaming files on the planet, Game Front has you covered. We also make no illusions about gaming: it's supposed to be fun. Browse gaming galleries, humor lists, and honest, short-form reporting. Game on!

FileFront Forums - Terms of Service - Top
Copyright © 2002-2016 Game Front. All rights reserved. Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2016, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Forum Theme by Danny King (FileTrekker), Sheepeep & Graeme(rs)
RSS Feed Widget by FeedWind