![]() |
Re: Do you Jim take John to be your lawfully wedded something or other? if thats what you think then fine be it, but i would like to see you go up to every single gay person and tell them that its not right. |
Re: Do you Jim take John to be your lawfully wedded something or other? Quote:
if i saw two men kissing in a side street, i would be angry, i would tell them to get to there home and stay of streets sadly this is all i can do, as it is not illegel, however they still are not too public about it, as it is still a taboo |
Re: Do you Jim take John to be your lawfully wedded something or other? why get angry tho? they are people showing there love.. you wouldnt get pissed if you saw to 5 year olds kissing...or two young lover of different sex...yet if you see two men or two women kissing you would get angry? |
Re: Do you Jim take John to be your lawfully wedded something or other? Quote:
sadly the young people today are becoming supporting of homosexuality, wasted life on art and music and becoming like american teenagers, people like me, who are training to be something society needs and agree with real values are slowely becoming smaller in numbers but this is what american tv and music does to youth i do like rock music from around the world though, but i do not waste life on it |
Re: Do you Jim take John to be your lawfully wedded something or other? ok for one..i dont own a TV i hate it, the music i listen to is Eurpen, and what your saying is you this its wrong? well how about i say that its wrong for anyone to be a different colour then me..or its wrong to look asain and not like me? is that not wrong? |
Re: Do you Jim take John to be your lawfully wedded something or other? Quote:
i could still have a baby with an American or european man so it is not the same as wrong homosexuals |
Re: Do you Jim take John to be your lawfully wedded something or other? no im saying that if your not white or anglo saxon you are not meant to be and are wrong...a sub human so to speak. i mean i am in the right to say that arnt i? |
Re: Do you Jim take John to be your lawfully wedded something or other? Quote:
|
Re: Do you Jim take John to be your lawfully wedded something or other? same for you :) |
Re: Do you Jim take John to be your lawfully wedded something or other? Quote:
NO, they do not! |
Re: Do you Jim take John to be your lawfully wedded something or other? oral sex.....its just like when a women sucks a man...same with a women...its just like when a man licks her out.... you also just proved that your a hypocrite. |
Re: Do you Jim take John to be your lawfully wedded something or other? Quote:
i am a women and i would not do things like using my mouth, thats awful and too men is much worse, very highly worse! |
Re: Do you Jim take John to be your lawfully wedded something or other? :Puzzled:.....you ask any guy here if they would want there dick sucked..... |
Re: Do you Jim take John to be your lawfully wedded something or other? Quote:
|
Re: Do you Jim take John to be your lawfully wedded something or other? i dont know about the thing with (i think your from China by the photo there) but i am sure that if a girl was to ask a guy if he wanted to be blown he would drop his pants quicker then a dingo shiting... |
Re: Do you Jim take John to be your lawfully wedded something or other? Quote:
|
Re: Do you Jim take John to be your lawfully wedded something or other? its not at all degrading..you just have to look back in history and at the fourms of sexual acts that ocoured....even in the times of the Roman empire after parties there were orgies and same sex happened then. the only time that same sex because "bad" was when the Christians came into power and there warped ways were inposed on the westen world. |
Re: Do you Jim take John to be your lawfully wedded something or other? Quote:
most people think it is wrong because its wrong, cant you see and why do you think roman empire crumbled?, because of degrading rampant homosexuals and criminals and weak willed leaders who were more interested in same sex lovers than protecting their land! |
Re: Do you Jim take John to be your lawfully wedded something or other? no the Roman empire crumbled because of the stupidaty of the govament...and Islam Jews hindus and even budast (i think) think gatness is wrong...these are all things made 1000's of years ago...we are in the 21st centry...if you dont move on you will be stuck in the 10th! |
Re: Do you Jim take John to be your lawfully wedded something or other? Quote:
|
Re: Do you Jim take John to be your lawfully wedded something or other? China also thinks its ok to run over people with tanks.... |
Re: Do you Jim take John to be your lawfully wedded something or other? Quote:
|
Re: Do you Jim take John to be your lawfully wedded something or other? the big point i am trying to make is that you said its ok for me to say your a asian and you shouldnt be or to a black person he/she shouldnt be and that be ok."even tho im wrong" as you said but for you to say that gays shouldnt be thats ok..but when i say even tho its wrong...you say no...how is that? why are you a hypocrite? |
Re: Do you Jim take John to be your lawfully wedded something or other? Quote:
|
Re: Do you Jim take John to be your lawfully wedded something or other? as i said in my PM to you i accept gay people because i only see them as they are. two people in love with eachother. like me, me and my girlfriend (you think thats ok yes) well she is black and my grandfather is oposed to that. and that hirts me so much. how would you like it if someone says to you no you cant love him because he is white or black or a red head or has blue eyes. |
Re: Do you Jim take John to be your lawfully wedded something or other? Hey! Look at that! You are incorrect. Homosexuality is not "wrong," any more than being black is wrong. There's a word for people like you. Bigots. |
Re: Do you Jim take John to be your lawfully wedded something or other? Quote:
|
Re: Do you Jim take John to be your lawfully wedded something or other? you look at that! are vile you can't go judge people just becuase there a homosexual what if *hypothetical* you have a brother who you dearly like but you find out he is gay what would you do, i bet you wouldnt disown him, hey. Just think about it peoplelike you are the reason the world isnt moving fowards as much as it could you need to learn how to accept any one. Quote:
even if he is good on him. |
Re: Do you Jim take John to be your lawfully wedded something or other? According to Christianity, it's ok to be gay, but it's not ok to act upon those feelings. That is because the Church thinks all sex has to be unitive and pro creative, which it can never be between two men (or two women). I don't understand how God can create homosexuals and say that they're not allowed to act upon their biological urges, but hey, that's the Church for ya. |
Re: Do you Jim take John to be your lawfully wedded something or other? thats why i am not religoius lol |
Re: Do you Jim take John to be your lawfully wedded something or other? Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: Do you Jim take John to be your lawfully wedded something or other? Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: Do you Jim take John to be your lawfully wedded something or other? Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: Do you Jim take John to be your lawfully wedded something or other? For the record, I'm not, which only serves to make my argument stronger, as I prove it's possible to support a group without being one of them. |
Re: Do you Jim take John to be your lawfully wedded something or other? Quote:
Quote:
Keep it civil and peacefull around here. |
Re: Do you Jim take John to be your lawfully wedded something or other? Quote:
And by the way, it is reported by Julius Caesar's biographer, Suetonius, that Caesar participated in sex with Nicomedes the fourth, of Bithynia to ensure the control of Bithynia passed to Rome. Caesar's enemies often used that as an allegation later on in his political career. However, it is something that Caesar vigorously denied all his life. |
Re: Do you Jim take John to be your lawfully wedded something or other? Quote:
|
Re: Do you Jim take John to be your lawfully wedded something or other? *i think he is a she but yes to be fair she did call him gay. |
Re: Do you Jim take John to be your lawfully wedded something or other? Quote:
Quote:
Being homosexual, being black, whatever: it's all natural. It occurs naturally. Or at least it isn't a choice (in most cases - pertaining to both examples). "Normal" is how prevalent it is in society. Saying that "because something isn't as prevalent in society means it's a bad thing" is ridiculous: that's like me saying that being Asian is bad because there aren't many Asian families in my district. Quote:
Maybe you could enlighten us all and share your reasoning, because I'm certainly interested in knowing. |
Re: Do you Jim take John to be your lawfully wedded something or other? The biggest problem homosexuals have, is the church, everything else is surmountable by logic, except the church, which contains little to no logic at all. In some cases the religious front is moving their ‘backing’ to better suit their ideology that homosexuality is the work of the devil. This movement is highlighted in the case below: Quote:
|
Re: Do you Jim take John to be your lawfully wedded something or other? when ever i ask my friends or just acuteness whats wrong with being gay they all say " wait let me jack off for a few more seconds and then i will tell you" they all say that they have no idea, so what the fuck how can you hate something if you don't know why? Quote:
|
Re: Do you Jim take John to be your lawfully wedded something or other? Quote:
And the argument that 'because it is not prevalent it is bad' is quite flawed - the written word was not prevalent in the ancient world, many people said it corrupted and degraded the capacity of the human memory, yet nowadays, it is still common, despite the prevalency of electronic devices, and I for one certainly do not think it degrades memory |
Re: Do you Jim take John to be your lawfully wedded something or other? Look at that, just out of curiousity, are you a buddhist, or Christian.. or what..? |
Re: Do you Jim take John to be your lawfully wedded something or other? I tend to think of myself as being an atheist, but if you go by a certain Saquist's definition of a theist, someone who believes in a greater force than mankind, then i am a theist, since I, naturally, believe in gravity as being a greater force than mankind. |
Re: Do you Jim take John to be your lawfully wedded something or other? Quote:
|
Re: Do you Jim take John to be your lawfully wedded something or other? It's perverted no matter wich way you spin it. |
Re: Do you Jim take John to be your lawfully wedded something or other? Quote:
|
Re: Do you Jim take John to be your lawfully wedded something or other? What is perverted no matter which way you spin it? Homosexuality? Or something else? |
Re: Do you Jim take John to be your lawfully wedded something or other? Quote:
and second: whats perverted the Chinese or homosexuality? |
Re: Do you Jim take John to be your lawfully wedded something or other? Quote:
Quote:
but she is right about homosexuals being wrong and murder and betraying marriage |
| All times are GMT -7. |
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2016, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.0 ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.