FileFront Forums

FileFront Forums (http://forums.filefront.com/)
-   The Pub (http://forums.filefront.com/pub-578/)
-   -   Do you Jim take John to be your lawfully wedded something or other? (http://forums.filefront.com/pub/284339-do-you-jim-take-john-your-lawfully-wedded-something-other.html)

Emperor Benedictine December 30th, 2006 04:49 PM

Re: Do you Jim take John to be your lawfully wedded something or other?
 
Everyone deviates from the norms of social behaviour in some way...it is a matter of whether this deviation is harmful to others that is important (significantly harmful, that is - revulsion doesn't count).

Even if you could call homosexuality a mental illness or disorder, that means nothing. There is no inherent reason people with disorders should be "corrected" unless they pose a real and immediate threat to others, or unless they wish to be, nor should they be treated as lesser beings.

Akula971 December 30th, 2006 04:55 PM

Re: Do you Jim take John to be your lawfully wedded something or other?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by TheDarkInvader (Post 3455346)
There is no inherent reason people with disorders should be "corrected" unless they pose a real and immediate threat to others, or unless they wish to be, nor should they be treated as lesser beings.

Threat to others or themselves perhaps. Having an erect penis rammed up your arse is pretty threatening to me..LOL. Or indulging in such practices that pass on AIDS. It was not for nothing that AIDS was originally called the gay plague. I'm wondering what that African was thinking when he thought. "I know I'll fuck that monkey"

Emperor Benedictine December 30th, 2006 07:18 PM

Re: Do you Jim take John to be your lawfully wedded something or other?
 
Quote:

Having an erect penis rammed up your arse is pretty threatening to me..LOL.
I don't think you have to worry.
Quote:

Or indulging in such practices that pass on AIDS.
Unprotected sex?

Deanoz December 30th, 2006 11:54 PM

Re: Do you Jim take John to be your lawfully wedded something or other?
 
The right to act freely should not be revoked unless that action infringes on another persons ability to act freely. This concept should be strictly upheld.

Examples of actions that do not infringe on others are:
Gay Marriage
Not wearing a seatbelt while operating a motor vehicle

Niether of these effect other people. These laws are in place because particular people don't understand the very basic idea of freedom. It's obviously more complicated for some people.

Fear-No-Evil December 31st, 2006 08:18 AM

Re: Do you Jim take John to be your lawfully wedded something or other?
 
People, no matter what their sexual preference, have a right to whatever common courtesies everyone else in the world has. These are, without doubt, normal people. And it's up to them what they do with their lives.
Gay marriage? Fine by me. In my view, it's barely worth a discussion of this magnitude.
Now, Gay adoption, there's something I can understand people arguing about.

SuperFantastic December 31st, 2006 09:39 AM

Re: Do you Jim take John to be your lawfully wedded something or other?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Fear-No-Evil (Post 3456391)
People, no matter what their sexual preference, have a right to whatever common courtesies everyone else in the world has. These are, without doubt, normal people. And it's up to them what they do with their lives.
Gay marriage? Fine by me. In my view, it's barely worth a discussion of this magnitude.
Now, Gay adoption, there's something I can understand people arguing about.

yep i agree with you on those points.

Rich19 January 2nd, 2007 06:13 AM

Re: Do you Jim take John to be your lawfully wedded something or other?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Akula971 (Post 3455354)
Having an erect penis rammed up your arse is pretty threatening to me..LOL.

Oh LOL your funny arent u!!1!

:rolleyes:


All times are GMT -7.

Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2016, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.0 ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.