Re: Do you Jim take John to be your lawfully wedded something or other?
 

yes she has extreame opinions

Re: Do you Jim take John to be your lawfully wedded something or other?
 

Homosexual people eat. They sleep. They like watching TV, or going for a jog, or owning a pet. They are completely and utterly like every other human being on this planet in every respect other than in the fact that they are attracted to the opposite sex.

That sounds normal to me.

Re: Do you Jim take John to be your lawfully wedded something or other?
 

Fez, we argued how normal homosexual people are on the previous page. Putting their hobbies/interests/whatever aside, they are abnormal. They cannot reproduce more of themselves which makes them abnormal.

Re: Do you Jim take John to be your lawfully wedded something or other?
 

Something being "abnormal" is shoddy justification for condemning it.

Re: Do you Jim take John to be your lawfully wedded something or other?
 

I need proof to have an opinion? Since when was this verdict passed down? Which court was this?

The Fez Supreme court?

I gave MY reasons...They don't have to represent you...YOU go by a completely different moral code than I.

You'r code thus far is..."maybe maybe not." Wrong is right and right is wrong. That's what you're telling me.

You're saying I'm wrong because the GAY doesn't fit in with the creator's design of the family and doesn't equal fair if man isn't allowed to marry and copulate with anything he sets eyes on!

Give-me-a-break. Mine is not the only opinion being swung around.

Re: Do you Jim take John to be your lawfully wedded something or other?
 

What like kiddy fiddlers, they are abnormal...aren't they?
You don't have to condemn something, just not approve of it.

The one thing I can never understand about homosexuals (I don't approve of the use of the word gay, it means merry happy, etc not shoving parts where they where not meant to be) is why they need to flout show off their sexuality. I know a few homosexual couples, and what I notice is that they have pictures on their walls of muscle bound men holding babies/or just partly clothed muscle bound men, you know the sort of black and white print. But when I visit my normal friends/couples, then look no pictures of partly clad people at all. Why this need to scream to the world "look at me I'm queer"?
Humanity did not label these people "QUEER" for no reason...

Change its name, call it what ever you like. We don't approve! It may well be polite to accept them publicly, to be cool, to be PC. But behind closed doors we find them to be an abomination, a perversion, a symptom of all that is wrong with this world.

Re: Do you Jim take John to be your lawfully wedded something or other?
 

Yes, but I seriously hope that's not the reason you "disapprove" of them...

Re: Do you Jim take John to be your lawfully wedded something or other?
 

I do condemn the practice.
I can not support it. I don't support it because it's not God's view it's man's view.

And if man's view was so much better I don't think the world would be as it is...A peice of crap....

Re: Do you Jim take John to be your lawfully wedded something or other?
 

I do not condemn it. I was merely clearing up the fact that they are indeed abnormal. As I said on the page before, they still deserve the same rights.

Re: Do you Jim take John to be your lawfully wedded something or other?
 

Just as in the same way "handicapped people" have rights, well all humans should enjoy the same rights in a civil society. But that does not mean that we want more handicapped people, that we should actively promote such things. What I find to be most the most repugnant aspect is that they want to be married, which is a religious belief and ceremony, for if you believe in marriage then you must believe in God and the teachings of the bible, which forbid homosexual behaviour. I'm all for them to have civil partnerships so that they have the same legal rights as heterosexual people. But marriage NO. homosexual priests NO. Its like a white person wanting to join a black organisation like the Association of black police officers (which quite frankly is a racist oxymoron imo). Or a man wanting to join the women's volleyball team (I see the attraction) or such like.
I do believe that the homosexual community has a lot to offer society, some of our greatest entertainers are or have been homosexuals.
Persecution is wrong, as is preferential treatment, or the promotion of one group above another, so please no Pink Parades, gay marches, after all when was the last time you saw a Straight sex march?