FileFront Forums - Do you Jim take John to be your lawfully wedded something or other?

FileFront Forums (http://forums.filefront.com/)

- The Pub (http://forums.filefront.com/pub-578/)

- - Do you Jim take John to be your lawfully wedded something or other? (http://forums.filefront.com/pub/284339-do-you-jim-take-john-your-lawfully-wedded-something-other.html)

Re: Do you Jim take John to be your lawfully wedded something or other?

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saquist (Post 3449105)

I, in good conscience can not agree with or specify anything of the kind.

When a man marries a woman and vice versa it is a union designed to join mothers fathers brothers and sister...cousin Aunts and Uncles...It is also designed to preserve a future for both families.

It is litteraly a forge between families...people and potentially nations and thus the entire Earth.

True one man and one woman our Families began. You wish me to standarize any combination as a family. I can not.

A mother and a child or father and a child are broken families but ar still more of a family than two men. Why.

Because man and woman will always be the most ideal method to not only to expand the human family but to raise the human family. Homosexauls often veyr very often do not have the propper mental disposition to raise children. And it's unique. They've suffered from a type of abuse that is cyclic and cancerous: Prone to repetition. Most of this is never reported. We'd be fools to think that surveys are wholely acurate.

Exposing children to such a high risk of abuse is apauling. I would not do so with a heterosexual couple as a homosexual couple. Now we're dealing with a whole classification of individuals who have had a strong chance of abuse by their very sexual nature.

Children raised under this arrange will lack the proper perspective of the missing gender.

Offically I can not ever condone exposing a child to this risk.
Unofficially I must also recongnize that some of these homes have been better than the traditional family system.

For me this is merely the further decline of "family" arrangements.

Do you have any proof behind this to elevate it from the realms of opinion?

Thought not.

Re: Do you Jim take John to be your lawfully wedded something or other?

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fez Boy (Post 3451560)

Do you have any proof behind this to elevate it from the realms of opinion?

Thought not.

you have no proof homosexuals are normal

you always say how wrong we are or how we been brainwashed to think it not normal

but you no diffrent, you never tell us why it is normal, you all just state to us it is normal, so you must be brainwashed to think it is normal?

my mother may be strange, but i agree with her, homosexuals should burn for their awful ways!

Re: Do you Jim take John to be your lawfully wedded something or other?

you have no proof why it is abnormal we have asked you many times and you don't give a answer.

Re: Do you Jim take John to be your lawfully wedded something or other?

Quote:

Originally Posted by captwill (Post 3451577)

you have no proof why it is abnormal we have asked you many times and you don't give a answer.

but you have no proof it normal, why do you not use your own ideals when you do something?

Re: Do you Jim take John to be your lawfully wedded something or other?

we ask you a question you answer it its normal becuase today in the "civieliced" world exept everybody nomatter what sex,race or sexuality, now answer your question.

Re: Do you Jim take John to be your lawfully wedded something or other?

Quote:

Originally Posted by captwill (Post 3451604)

we ask you a question you answer it its normal becuase today in the "civieliced" world exept everybody nomatter what sex,race or sexuality, now answer your question.

see, but that your opinion, you can not state and order to me it normal.

what give you right over me, jsut because more people on this forum agree with you?

Re: Do you Jim take John to be your lawfully wedded something or other?

Homosexuality is abnormal...it's not a good or normal thing. That's not to say they don't deserve the same rights as anyone else though.

Re: Do you Jim take John to be your lawfully wedded something or other?

she people may not like it but they still exept them as people unlike you if people are not like you in this case sexuality you hate them,now as asked countless times answer your question.

Re: Do you Jim take John to be your lawfully wedded something or other?

You keep saying its not "normal", but what is your definition of normal?:uhm:

Re: Do you Jim take John to be your lawfully wedded something or other?

Quote:

Originally Posted by Webster.com

normal: conforming to a type, standard, or regular pattern

I think it's safe to say the the heterosexuals are the standard and that the homosexuals are not; they are outside of the pattern.