Re: Do you Jim take John to be your lawfully wedded something or other?
 

Will anything but some peoples feelings be hurt by allowing same sex marriages?
Yesterday the court here in Denmark ruled that the paper who published those Muhammed drawings did not hurt any ones feeling intentionally.. Which made it ok. The same would go for same sex marriages.
It might even cause the attendance in Churches to go up!
The only problem I see is deciding who's mister and misses when making table arrangements for parties:-)

Re: Do you Jim take John to be your lawfully wedded something or other?
 

I really, don't think so ;)
and who is the quarterback and who is the reciever ;)

Re: Do you Jim take John to be your lawfully wedded something or other?
 

:D
I think it would here in Denmark... Sunday services are often called off due to lacking attendance.

Why is it any discussion regarding homosexuals always end up concerning where they stuff it? A considerable amount of heterosexuals use that entrance also:o ... What people do in privacy is their own business.. The boundary between moral concern and "unholy" curiosity is paperthin:D

Re: Do you Jim take John to be your lawfully wedded something or other?
 

Why not? Sexual preference is just as arbitrary as eye colour.

Re: Do you Jim take John to be your lawfully wedded something or other?
 

I'm not gay, but I don't see why gay people shouldn't have the same rights. Just leave me outta it.

Re: Do you Jim take John to be your lawfully wedded something or other?
 

Good job avoiding the issue :thumbsup:

If you weren't so abrassive you could've be a politician.

Re: Do you Jim take John to be your lawfully wedded something or other?
 

No.
Homosexuality is a disease. Eye color is a trait.
There is no issue.

Besides, today's paper shows un happy results from the state with the word marriage:)
They are going to have to settle for "civil union" and live with it.
:smokin:

Re: Do you Jim take John to be your lawfully wedded something or other?
 

Homosexuality is not unique to our century, or our culture. Homosexual partnerships (as in what marriage is) are not unique to our culture or our century.

Quoted for truth. God willing, America might actually listen to that once in a while.

Re: Do you Jim take John to be your lawfully wedded something or other?
 

Do you have any proof to back that up, whatsoever? Besides the "if you want a penis up your bum you're sick" claim, which is infact the equivilent of saying "bcuz i say so!"?

I do not care for the name marriage itself. I just think that civil unions should have the same name for both straight and gay couples. Either call both marriage, or call both civil unions and keep marriage as a religious cerimony. It's the fact that people like you make such a problem of this and try their best to make them feel different (by giving it a different name) that people do not feel fully equal yet.

Re: Do you Jim take John to be your lawfully wedded something or other?
 

Ummm, you actually need me to prove to you that male butsex is sick? Really?
Homosexuality is not a choice they make, now is it? They are born with it, right?
Right, they are born with a brain disorder, disease, however you want to lable it. The shit ain't normal.
Religion aside, a man and a man were not intended to have sex or breed. it's just not natural. Its 100% abnormal. No matter what MTV or Bravo channel tells you.
Hey if they want to live that sick nasty life I say go right ahead, just call it something other when you want to get hitched is all i am saying.

I don't but hopefully the sane ones in power will :)
Hey kids I know its "cool" these days to not conform and rebel so i know in my heart all of you straight males here know what I am talking about.
Every straight male is turned off by mansex, this I know.