FileFront Forums

FileFront Forums (http://forums.filefront.com/)
-   The Pub (http://forums.filefront.com/pub-578/)
-   -   Do you Jim take John to be your lawfully wedded something or other? (http://forums.filefront.com/pub/284339-do-you-jim-take-john-your-lawfully-wedded-something-other.html)

AlDaja December 11th, 2006 12:33 PM

Re: Do you Jim take John to be your lawfully wedded something or other?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Saquist (Post 3420674)
I've yet to see any truely conclussive evidence along those lines Aldaja.

I said this before...


So i agree with you....the thing is about gentics and our genome is that we don't know what all the consequences lead to...

As it stands ...They can link sexuality to a gene/chemical...does it decided sexuality...that's up in the air...because to say so would mean that we know all the out comes of all the combinations...and we don't.

Fair enough:D

AlDaja December 11th, 2006 12:36 PM

Re: Do you Jim take John to be your lawfully wedded something or other?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Machiavelli's Apprentice (Post 3420686)
A variety of reasons. If there's no taboo against it, it can simply be a casual form of recreation - like in Ancient Athens (Though they did have their own taboos and rules concerning the practice).

It can also happen if there simply aren't any women around (We can see this in the animal kingdom, where males "relieve" themselves or each other)

Or maybe the guy just lacks the maturity and/or skills to deal with women.

Goats and sheep do this a lot and used to crack me up when I was a kid…when we had to separate the bucks and does, your right they would get frisky with each other. Although, I can’t imagine a time EVER, I would consider back-dooring some dude or whatever…but, I can’t say it doesn’t happen – we’ve all heard stories about prison.

Joe Bonham December 16th, 2006 02:46 PM

Re: Do you Jim take John to be your lawfully wedded something or other?
 
I also find it irritating how this fact somehow makes homosexuality right.

Well animals do it! Yes, but they also eat their young, and kill each other. Does that make those practices right as well?

Mr. Pedantic December 16th, 2006 05:12 PM

Re: Do you Jim take John to be your lawfully wedded something or other?
 
well, since humans are technically animals, then i suppose its as okay as much as people think animals eating others of the same species is okay.

But I think people maintain that cannibalism is not okay, whereas in the rest of the animal kingdom it is, because people tend to think that because we can think independently and stuff like that, it means that we are somehow better than other animals, and not cannibalising others is just part of that distinction that people think makes us unique.

I dont know about you, but i tend to think homosexuality is okay because that is how people are. It does not matter whether it is a conscious choice on their part, or predetermined before birth, but some way or another, they got to be that way, and they should be respected rather than ridiculed for this.

Fez Boy December 16th, 2006 05:16 PM

Re: Do you Jim take John to be your lawfully wedded something or other?
 
Ooh, have the right-wing bigots still not acknowledged the right of the homosexual person to get married? Why am I not surprised?

People have rights. This is irrefutable. People have the right to get married to other people, regardless of gender. This infringes nobody else's rights. Who, exactly, is being hurt by gay marriage?

Mr. Pedantic December 16th, 2006 07:33 PM

Re: Do you Jim take John to be your lawfully wedded something or other?
 
Well, nobody, physically, but i suppose it is an ideological, theological hurt.

Safe-Keeper December 17th, 2006 01:12 AM

Re: Do you Jim take John to be your lawfully wedded something or other?
 
Quote:

Who, exactly, is being hurt by gay marriage?
No one. That's why the opponents need to produce myths such as that kids of gay marriage get bullied to death (a claim which can be shot down by studying societies that allow gay adoption), that it's the cause of rising divorce rates (a claim for which there's no evidence whatsoever), and so on. My favorite is that it's "unnatural", despite the fact that over 400 species in nature engage in homosexual love and sex.

And, of course, they need to sprinkle it with fallacies such as Appeal to Common Belief, Appeal to Tradition, Appeal to Ridicule, and many others, sprinkled with a healthy dose of quotes from their favorite Holy Book.

But logical arguments? None.

(Wow, a short post from me? I wonder if such a groundbreaking event is not one of the signs of the End Times...)

Look at that! December 17th, 2006 01:14 AM

Re: Do you Jim take John to be your lawfully wedded something or other?
 
it is awful, it degrades society!

ANZACSAS December 17th, 2006 01:20 AM

Re: Do you Jim take John to be your lawfully wedded something or other?
 
i see some people here saying that they dont mind it...but hate seen two men kissing....what if its two women kissing? would you go yuck then?...what..whats that?? NO?!?! well thats fucked up...you dont like seen two men kissing even tho they love eachother...but yet two women??

grow the fuck up.

Look at that! December 17th, 2006 01:21 AM

Re: Do you Jim take John to be your lawfully wedded something or other?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ANZACSAS (Post 3430837)
i see some people here saying that they dont mind it...but hate seen two men kissing....what if its two women kissing? would you go yuck then?...what..whats that?? NO?!?! well thats fucked up...you dont like seen two men kissing even tho they love eachother...but yet two women??

grow the fuck up.


same sex "love" is wrong no matter


All times are GMT -7.

Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2016, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.0 ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.