Re: Do you Jim take John to be your lawfully wedded something or other?
Quote:
Originally Posted by WhiteShark
What does Hitler have to do with blacks? That's pretty far fetched, is it not?
I suppose it would be, if you didn’t read what I stated. However it’s plain as day. Lets look closer, shall we:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sedistix
Comparing the rights of homosexuals to marry with "ridding back of the bus", or "Der Fuhrer”.
Notice the key word of ‘or’ in there. What does the word 'or' serve as when written? As always, it suggests an alternative, not a connection.
Several arguments presented here mentioned the civil rights movement. Referring to the oppression and discrimination of blacks in American History. IE 'back of the bus'. There have also been some remarks about hitler, hence my mentioning above. Does it make sense now?
Quote:
Originally Posted by CKY2K
I think Nazis are brought up in almost every debate topic on FileFront...
Yep!
[CENTER][B][FONT=Verdana][SIZE=1]When we change the way we look at things, what we look at changes.[/SIZE][/FONT][/B]
[/CENTER]
Re: Do you Jim take John to be your lawfully wedded something or other?
Quote:
Originally Posted by CKY2K
Yea, the whole argument is just revolving around in a big circle... And the constant comparisons to Hitler are just getting pathetic...I think Nazis are brought up in almost every debate topic on FileFront...
Well Hitler didn't like gays, and neither does Bush, or conservatives, or bigots. So I'd say it is a fair comparison.
Re: Do you Jim take John to be your lawfully wedded something or other?
The must fundalmental question is...What are they being prevented from doing. Whiteshark you can't represent Gay/Lesbian. You just haven't been capable of addressing the Issues at hand.
That's not a personal slight that's a read of ability.
If the constitution is to be changed...and Likely something Will happen along those lines in the New GOvernment...
Then What right are we talking about....Right to ......what....? Mary another man? That's happend already. What would this amendment look like? Right to spousal support because I can't support myself? Right to half of everything in the marriage?
When we're dealing with two men the needs become extremely problematic.
Re: Do you Jim take John to be your lawfully wedded something or other?
Quote:
Anyway, I guess all arguments have been stated. Any further debate is pointless. From what I see, certain arguments get ignored and then "omg lolz teh marriage is holy" is repeated constantly.
Re: Do you Jim take John to be your lawfully wedded something or other?
Who cares if two men get married, or two women? Do you seriously lose sleep over it? How can you be THAT bothered by it? I don't mind if they get married...and I'm not losing sleep over it. I've got my life to live - why should I forbid homosexuals equal rights? I remember a time when there was the same stigma about interracial marriage...
Re: Do you Jim take John to be your lawfully wedded something or other?
Quote:
Why are atheists allowed marry?
Because religous rules protect the religious person, and the people around him. So an atheist gets the same rights as the religous person - at least in Western Christianity.
An atheist can marry just like a religious person. But he can't marry his dog, religious or not.
The first recorded evidence of marriage [...] dates from about 2350 B.C., in Mesopotamia. [...] Back then, marriage had little to do with love or with religion.
I thought you were bored and annoyed.
Actually yes, it is the question. You're stealing customs too. And I'm sure you're aware that the earliest recorded occurance is actually biblical. Which one you chose to adopt as numero uno is as fickled as a dipped pickle.
This site is part of the Defy Media Gaming network
The best serving of video game culture, since 2001. Whether you're looking for news, reviews, walkthroughs, or the biggest collection of PC gaming files on the planet, Game Front has you covered. We also make no illusions about gaming: it's supposed to be fun. Browse gaming galleries, humor lists, and honest, short-form reporting. Game on!