Re: Do you Jim take John to be your lawfully wedded something or other?
 

Again, there is no argument so you have no defeat, nor will you ever.
Let it go.
Most likely. Definitely something wrong in the brain.
I really don't believe its a choice they just make because of their surroundings or whatever. It doesn't fit.
Having two Dads/Moms? No thanks.
Poor kids.
Nice

Either way as far as this subject is concerned I have not heard any further news. I'll keep you posted.

Re: Do you Jim take John to be your lawfully wedded something or other?
 

Uh, so there's no argument about gay marriages here? Why is this thread in The Pub then?

Re: Do you Jim take John to be your lawfully wedded something or other?
 

You're a smart guy, I'll let you figure that out :)

Re: Do you Jim take John to be your lawfully wedded something or other?
 

Well, it is, from a scientific standpoint. Socially, it isn't normal, as is the case with homosexuality, which is a minority trait. But that doesn't mean it's a negative thing.

Touché. :rolleyes:

You’re right. It’s just you, stating and restating your opinion like it’s the ultimate rebuttal.

What possible evidence could point to two moms/two dads being a thoroughly negative thing? I’m talking statistically accurate evidence, and not some opinion tripe.

Re: Do you Jim take John to be your lawfully wedded something or other?
 

Only because you types keep trying to tell me my views are wrong, what choice do I have?


Common sense?

Re: Do you Jim take John to be your lawfully wedded something or other?
 

:Puzzled:

I request a move to Spamming Forums, if not at least a move to General Yib-Yab (Off Topic).

Re: Do you Jim take John to be your lawfully wedded something or other?
 

Nah. I think male sexuality is something as ideally suited to the pub as anything out there.

This is in the pub, right?

Re: Do you Jim take John to be your lawfully wedded something or other?
 

It was a rhetorical question. There are no statistics, because it's an untrue generalization.

Re-word your argument using non-offensive and/or open-minded terminology and language, so it appears as though you've conceded while still maintaining your original point? That way everybody wins and we stop going in circles.

Re: Do you Jim take John to be your lawfully wedded something or other?
 

"Originally Posted by beef flaps http://www.filefront.ft6.com/gamingf...s/viewpost.gif
Common sense?"

Well, apart from the fact that a child growing up close to homosexual parents may have greater homosexual tendencies than other children, there's nothing wrong with it.

And Why is my whole reply in italics? I press Ctrl+I, but it always changes back. See? :(

Re: Do you Jim take John to be your lawfully wedded something or other?
 

Maybe. I don't think sexual orientation is something that can be influenced by everyday life experiences, though I wouldn't know for sure.

And your italics problem: is your text within your quote?