![]() |
Re: Do you Jim take John to be your lawfully wedded something or other? Quote:
|
Re: Do you Jim take John to be your lawfully wedded something or other? Marriage is a religious act, and it is the different churches that should be deciding if you can get married. The government shouldn't be involved at all in my opinion. No one should be getting any special rights for getting a union or marriage or whatever. |
Re: Do you Jim take John to be your lawfully wedded something or other? It doesn;t really matter, i suppose, as long as they're happy. And also, there is no evolutionary need for humans' protruding nose. That means that somewhere along the evolutionary line, people with noses were 'abnormal'. However, they're not abnormal now, are they? |
Re: Do you Jim take John to be your lawfully wedded something or other? Quote:
You can twist it anyway you want but in the end it is NOT normal. Comparing manlove to hair color is really reaching, pity. Yes, its a brain disorder for a man to love another man, while its not a brain disorder to have red hair:lol: Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
You can call me all the names that you can come up with it is not going to change my views. Homosexuality is abnormal, sick and a brain disorder. Fact will always remain two men or two women can't make a baby. Can't twist that. So with that said two men or two woman "loving eachother" is not normal. It may be considered normal to the young kids growing up in the twisted world we live in today but they are far from reality. Again, I am not against manlove just how they want to lable what we normal people call marriage. but you read right past that every post and try to change my views. I am not trying to change yours on that, now am I? Support it, watch it, participate in it, its all good. I'll continue to love females. Every straight male knows deep inside that manlove is nasty. I don't care what you try and make yourself out to look like in here. At least I am up front with it. Now, try and stay on point with the legal topic at hand, shall we? nahh, bashing "gay haters" is much more fun. but remember I don't hate gays as a person so focus that towards someone else. :beer: |
Re: Do you Jim take John to be your lawfully wedded something or other? Wait... So what was the original purpose of this thread? |
Re: Do you Jim take John to be your lawfully wedded something or other? Quote:
Quote:
People need to learn to keep stuff behind closed doors. If it does not seem to be socially acceptable, keep it in the closet;) |
Re: Do you Jim take John to be your lawfully wedded something or other? Quote:
I want it called a Civil Union, as most people do. Quote:
|
Re: Do you Jim take John to be your lawfully wedded something or other? Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
What a killerphrase is that anyway? I could use that one too, just with the message I want: "Every male knows deep inside that manlove is just as normal as a man loving a woman." See? Now that was easy, wasn't it? Quote:
I do think about sex, but my top3 priorities in life aren't all sex. You don't seem to able to control your insticts, if you have to think about sex 24/7, unlike other men. |
Re: Do you Jim take John to be your lawfully wedded something or other? Quote:
Cause i for once like women for more than sex... Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: Do you Jim take John to be your lawfully wedded something or other? I think love encompasses more than sex because othewise, everybody would marry, have an affair, divorce, marry again, or just go and pay for whores. |
| All times are GMT -7. |
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2016, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.0 ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.