| Afterburner | September 15th, 2006 09:33 PM | Re: Pope offendes muslims Quote:
Originally Posted by Aeroflotte Are you implying that we should massacre rednecks? | :uhm: Um... what?
I don't really get your meaning here. I am just saying that every action has a reaction. We arn't dicks to them(I am using "we" loosely here) for no reason, or just because we are douchebags. We are doing it because, atleast from this side of the fence, it appears that Muslims are violent and destructive. Now, I know that isn't the case for the most part, but they do often riot over... well over just about everything.
Also I should note that I find czech's analysis of Isreal odd considering the Jews weere there before the Muslims. And going back even further there were various religon's inhabiting the area which have since disappeared. So, using his logic, Isreal has every right to exsist there. Quote:
Originally Posted by mEkImIrMe What was the Nazi party? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christian_terrorism
The reason we don't see Christian terrorist groups is because we live in a Christian dominated West, where we use politics, coorporation, money, and stealth bombers instead of riots to attack Islam. If it were reversed we would see what we saw 900 years ago in the Crusades. | The Nazi party wasn't any particular religon. The higher-ups had a sort of pseudo0cultist type thing going on. On one hand they quite liked the things such as the Arc of the Covenant and other such religous artifacts, but they really just wanted them for their own benefit, not because they acually believed in any sort of religon. Hitler was defintly not Chrisitan is his beliefs.
Like I said, it is small groups of Chrisitans who are physically violent towards others. Then we have smallg roups of Muslims that are violent towards others. Then you have the Chrisitan majority who are peaceable and try to get their points across using peacerul means. Then you have the Muslim majority which is half riots and half peaceful. |