Originally Posted by jeff & eddie

Black death, black plague, bubonic plague, yersinia pestis, doesnt matter what you choose to call it or nick pick the names. They are all the same thing. The disease plagued europe, and my original statement that it was happening 500 years ago still remains unshaken.

With all due respect, im not here to hold everyones hand and explain to them that X Y and Z are the same thing. Like if you wish to believe that are hurricane, cyclone, and typhoon are all different things, there is little I can do. But I do request at least some knowledge of the topics at hand being discussed. Always makes for a more lively debate. ;)

Originally Posted by USMA2010

Simply drinking blood doesn't make a person a vampire. Its the whole fangs, turn into bats, burn in daylight crap that counts. Underworld vampires, not teenage goths who hate their parents.

Originally Posted by jeff & eddie

The disease was prevalent in europe from the 1300's until the 1700's. Thus, my previous statement of 500 years ago, remains true. Perhaps it is you who needs to take a peek into a modern history book. :)

Originally Posted by Fire Leigon

Werewolves don't exist for the simple reason no one's seen them well enough to get a real photo. You really think that in the entire history of mankind no one would have a clear view of a werewolf and be able to prove it?

Originally Posted by jeff & eddie

There are many animal species that have no been photographed and yet we say they do exist.

Originally Posted by Jeff & Eddie

Besides, do you honestly think photographs will change anything?

Originally Posted by jeff & eddie

Im afraid not, a bear looks nothing like a werewolf. Besides, there have been werewolf sightings in places that bears do not live.



Vampires did exist a little more than 500 years ago. But these were not the same kind(garlic, undead, coffins ect..) vampires that "hollywood" has portrayed for decades. The vampires I speak of were agents of the Illuminati who while practicing satanic rituals would sacrifice humans and drink their blood during ceremony. Although such dark rituals went out with the "blood cure-all commemoration", it was a very dark era in history(black plague anyone?). History doesnt lie.

Regardless, I sincerely doubt that the "hairy men" in the woods are hells angels or builders. Would it make sense for one of them to run around naked looking to eviscerate unsuspecting victoms? No. But would it make sense to do that if they were a werewolf who cannot control themselves? Absolutely. In remote areas of the world, the werewolves that have been spotted are known to be violent.

Originally Posted by jeff & eddie

There is a lot that man does not know about his natural world. Throughout history, for as long as man has been around, he's seen "Things" that certainly do not qualify as normal life on earth. While I believe there are a lot of interesting topics under cryptozoology, this thread will be focusing on lycanthropy. Or as the media calls it, "werewolves".

My biggest bit of evidence for the existance of werewolves, is that we have sightings of something called "bigfoot" all the time. There is research being done, foot imprints taken, hair samples and other direct evidence that some kind of large humanoid being does infact exist. But im fairly certain, that being is not a "ape-man" but rather a werewolf.

Now, think about it. Lets put on our fantasy hats for a second and pretend that there really is an ape-man called big-foot. Why is it so elusive? Why is it so hard to track and find? Especially when all footage we see of it shows a slow moving animal that is big and clunky? Here's why. A werewolf would be capable of turning back into a man, essentially eluding capture and no one would be more the wiser to that fact. Another coincidence, why havent we found any bones of bigfoot? Here's why. If a werewolf died, it would revert back to human form.

About three years ago, my brother Eddie was camping in Tennessee(near Oak Ridge if you've ever been there), and he saw what looked like a werewolf in the forest. Here's the picture he took before it ran off

http://www.picfury.com/b/werewolfinforest-2-th.jpg

The picture may be hard to see, it was taken at about 11pm at night(when he was headed back to camp) and it wasnt a full moon. He sketched it about a week later when he returned home with us, here's what he drew

http://www.picfury.com/b/werewolf-2-th.JPG

He described the ordeal as VERY fightening, and there was a horrible stench when he saw its outline up ahead(another synonymous detail with "bigfoot" sightings). But he clearly saw its head, and said it was a wolf animal, not a monkey. After he saw it, he said he got his picture and the camera noise made it run away on its hind legs through the forest. He later said the camera probably saved his life, he was worried it could of attacked him.

Has anyone here ever experienced things like this before? I know my brother eddie isnt the only one.