Originally Posted by jeff & eddie

Vampires did exist a little more than 500 years ago. But these were not the same kind(garlic, undead, coffins ect..) vampires that "hollywood" has portrayed for decades. The vampires I speak of were agents of the Illuminati who while practicing satanic rituals would sacrifice humans and drink their blood during ceremony. Although such dark rituals went out with the "blood cure-all commemoration", it was a very dark era in history(black plague anyone?). History doesnt lie.

Originally Posted by Mr. Matt

Well I don't know about werewolves, but I definitely believe in vampires. Nothing like Dracula and all that nonsense -- in reality they're far worse. They have their fingers in everything, they take money from industries and people alike without their consent and sometimes even without their knowledge, and the government actually encourages and supports them. How do I know this? Well, I've spoken with one of them. He was part of an organisation known as the Inland Revenue, though it goes under different names in different countries. The organisation has existed in one form or another since the 1600s at least, and its very powerful.

Originally Posted by jeff & eddie

Im afraid not, a bear looks nothing like a werewolf.

Originally Posted by JP(NL)

They were behind 9/11 aswell, right?

Originally Posted by jeff & eddie

Im afraid not, a bear looks nothing like a werewolf. Besides, there have been werewolf sightings in places that bears do not live.

Vampires did exist a little more than 500 years ago. But these were not the same kind(garlic, undead, coffins ect..) vampires that "hollywood" has portrayed for decades. The vampires I speak of were agents of the Illuminati who while practicing satanic rituals would sacrifice humans and drink their blood during ceremony. Although such dark rituals went out with the "blood cure-all commemoration", it was a very dark era in history(black plague anyone?). History doesnt lie.

Regardless, I sincerely doubt that the "hairy men" in the woods are hells angels or builders. Would it make sense for one of them to run around naked looking to eviscerate unsuspecting victoms? No. But would it make sense to do that if they were a werewolf who cannot control themselves? Absolutely. In remote areas of the world, the werewolves that have been spotted are known to be violent.

Originally Posted by jeff & eddie

it was a very dark era in history(black plague anyone?). History doesnt lie.

Originally Posted by Mephistopheles

Pied Piper of Hamelin is also not a mythological creature, he is quite real.
Since the 13th century he and his descendants have been leading little innocent children into disaster.


In the olden days:

http://www.washjeff.edu/CAPL/images/m/1431.jpg

Modern evidential images:

http://weser1a.de/Abb066/RaNeum94_b.jpghttp://weser1a.de/Abb066/Ra_McDo_007op.jpg http://www.inijrp.de/media/media-164.jpg http://www.gamingforums.com/image.ph...ine=1143429867

Quite convincing, I think.

Don't mess with werewolves, vampires and Pied Piper!

Originally Posted by jeff & eddie

Vampires did exist a little more than 500 years ago. The vampires I speak of were agents of the Illuminati who while practicing satanic rituals would sacrifice humans and drink their blood during ceremony.

Originally Posted by Mr. Matt

There could be a monkey in the picture you've supplied, and nobody would be able to tell the difference.



There aren't supposed to be big cats in Britain, but they're around here somewhere...



Uh oh!



No stupid, 9/11 happened in broad daylight!

Originally Posted by SpiderGoat

Black plague - somewhat more than 500 years ago - ca. 1500 - get a history book

And what history are you referring to exactly? What books? What sources? You give an "intelligent" analysis? Than you should bring in sources and evidence for what you claim history tells.

Originally Posted by DnC

But people do that nowadays though.

Originally Posted by SteviEboY

Not the guys avatar, thats just sort of wierd looking.

Originally Posted by jeff & eddie

The illuminati however, were very different. Drinking blood in their rituals was crucial before taking part in their endeavours. Having excess blood in their system prevented CAC, which was a very dangerous affliction aftering being exposed to a magnetic field over over 1.5 gauss. Which means yes, cruor absent cachexia as we know it today, did affect people experimenting with time travel.

Originally Posted by jeff & eddie

The disease was prevalent in europe from the 1300's until the 1700's. Thus, my previous statement of 500 years ago, remains true. Perhaps it is you who needs to take a peek into a modern history book.

Originally Posted by jeff & eddie

Black death, black plague, bubonic plague, yersinia pestis, doesnt matter what you choose to call it or nick pick the names. They are all the same thing. The disease plagued europe, and my original statement that it was happening 500 years ago still remains unshaken.

With all due respect, im not here to hold everyones hand and explain to them that X Y and Z are the same thing. Like if you wish to believe that are hurricane, cyclone, and typhoon are all different things, there is little I can do. But I do request at least some knowledge of the topics at hand being discussed. Always makes for a more lively debate. ;)

Originally Posted by USMA2010

Simply drinking blood doesn't make a person a vampire. Its the whole fangs, turn into bats, burn in daylight crap that counts. Underworld vampires, not teenage goths who hate their parents.

Originally Posted by jeff & eddie

The disease was prevalent in europe from the 1300's until the 1700's. Thus, my previous statement of 500 years ago, remains true. Perhaps it is you who needs to take a peek into a modern history book. :)

Originally Posted by Fire Leigon

Werewolves don't exist for the simple reason no one's seen them well enough to get a real photo. You really think that in the entire history of mankind no one would have a clear view of a werewolf and be able to prove it?

Originally Posted by jeff & eddie

There are many animal species that have no been photographed and yet we say they do exist.

Originally Posted by Jeff & Eddie

Besides, do you honestly think photographs will change anything?

Originally Posted by jeff & eddie

Im afraid not, a bear looks nothing like a werewolf. Besides, there have been werewolf sightings in places that bears do not live.



Vampires did exist a little more than 500 years ago. But these were not the same kind(garlic, undead, coffins ect..) vampires that "hollywood" has portrayed for decades. The vampires I speak of were agents of the Illuminati who while practicing satanic rituals would sacrifice humans and drink their blood during ceremony. Although such dark rituals went out with the "blood cure-all commemoration", it was a very dark era in history(black plague anyone?). History doesnt lie.

Regardless, I sincerely doubt that the "hairy men" in the woods are hells angels or builders. Would it make sense for one of them to run around naked looking to eviscerate unsuspecting victoms? No. But would it make sense to do that if they were a werewolf who cannot control themselves? Absolutely. In remote areas of the world, the werewolves that have been spotted are known to be violent.

Originally Posted by jeff & eddie

There is a lot that man does not know about his natural world. Throughout history, for as long as man has been around, he's seen "Things" that certainly do not qualify as normal life on earth. While I believe there are a lot of interesting topics under cryptozoology, this thread will be focusing on lycanthropy. Or as the media calls it, "werewolves".

My biggest bit of evidence for the existance of werewolves, is that we have sightings of something called "bigfoot" all the time. There is research being done, foot imprints taken, hair samples and other direct evidence that some kind of large humanoid being does infact exist. But im fairly certain, that being is not a "ape-man" but rather a werewolf.

Now, think about it. Lets put on our fantasy hats for a second and pretend that there really is an ape-man called big-foot. Why is it so elusive? Why is it so hard to track and find? Especially when all footage we see of it shows a slow moving animal that is big and clunky? Here's why. A werewolf would be capable of turning back into a man, essentially eluding capture and no one would be more the wiser to that fact. Another coincidence, why havent we found any bones of bigfoot? Here's why. If a werewolf died, it would revert back to human form.

About three years ago, my brother Eddie was camping in Tennessee(near Oak Ridge if you've ever been there), and he saw what looked like a werewolf in the forest. Here's the picture he took before it ran off

http://www.picfury.com/b/werewolfinforest-2-th.jpg

The picture may be hard to see, it was taken at about 11pm at night(when he was headed back to camp) and it wasnt a full moon. He sketched it about a week later when he returned home with us, here's what he drew

http://www.picfury.com/b/werewolf-2-th.JPG

He described the ordeal as VERY fightening, and there was a horrible stench when he saw its outline up ahead(another synonymous detail with "bigfoot" sightings). But he clearly saw its head, and said it was a wolf animal, not a monkey. After he saw it, he said he got his picture and the camera noise made it run away on its hind legs through the forest. He later said the camera probably saved his life, he was worried it could of attacked him.

Has anyone here ever experienced things like this before? I know my brother eddie isnt the only one.

Originally Posted by Nusentinsaino

Yes. Like the giant squid for example... They have never been sighted or photographed alive. However, remains of the dead bodies proves the existence. Werewolves? We never found the remains since it was invented

Originally Posted by Nostradamouse

MAy I remind you that Illuminatis were founded at the end of the 18th century, I doubt they are behind the "peste noire" (black Plague in French) of the 14th century...

Originally Posted by Crazy Wolf

I find it amusing that his avatar is that crazy Nazi from Raiders of the Lost Ark, a guy who would believe in myths and fairy tales.

Originally Posted by jeff & eddie

they want you to think they were founded in the 18th century, but thats only when they piggybacked onto the enlightenment and established their name. prior to that they were still around. They were called satanists, and their intentions were the same.

Originally Posted by jeff & eddie

If you expect to find wolf-man bones and such, that likely wont happen. Since when a werewolf dies, it reverts back to human form. Any "remains" found of a werewolf will look like an ordinary human being. Its not coincidence that bodies are found in the woods.

Originally Posted by jeff & eddie

Wrong movie.

Originally Posted by jeff&eddie

Even if someone obtained clear photographs, there will always be the stubborn skeptics who cry hoax.

Originally Posted by USMA2010

Nusent, you're actually wrong about the squid. One was photographed alive not too long ago.
http://www.usatoday.com/tech/science...d_x.htm?csp=36

Originally Posted by jeff & eddie

If you expect to find wolf-man bones and such, that likely wont happen. Since when a werewolf dies, it reverts back to human form. Any "remains" found of a werewolf will look like an ordinary human being. Its not coincidence that bodies are found in the woods.

Originally Posted by JP(NL)

Regardless, just because a 'giant squid' has been found, doesn't prove that the legends of the Kraken and other giant squids attacking and sinking boats are true.

Werewolves we have ZERO evidence of. None, other than unreliable eye witnesses and myth. Eye witness accounts are as reliable as Fox news is objective.

Originally Posted by Machiavelli's Apprentice

Didn't you know? Harry Potter and friends hide the bodies so the muggles won't find out. ;)

Originally Posted by jeff & eddie

A Giant Octopus isnt a Giant Squid. And finding a 30 foot cephalopod hardly counts as the "giants" that many evolutionists scream exists.

Either way, the giant squid is a mythological beast. Wherewe, we have proven video of "bigfoot"(actually a werewolf) captured on tape. On top of that, we have footprints, and legends that go back centuries of its existance.

Originally Posted by Nusentinsaino

Jeff & Eddie needs to realize the point of what you just said. :deal: