![]() |
Re: Terrorists Its my impression that the terrorists killed in Iraq have nothing to do with the "War on terror" in the west! I dont see many potential Muhammed Ata's among them. They are recruited in the region, and would, due to stubborn singlemindedness, fueled only by fanaticism, be poor choices for trying to live incognito in some western country planning major strikes. They are merely cannon fodder drawing attention from those with the potential to pose a real threat.... And they are in some aspects succeding.. Because often you hear someone mention the number of dead insurgents in Iraq as a measure of the succes in "war on terror". At the same time Al Quida is treated like some sort of James Bond Sprectre organisation. That seems wrong imo. To me it looks like AQ is a label "earned" by groups of extremists when they succeed, and only when they succeed, in performing an attack... A method securing that AQ appears to be very succesful... Seems to remember that the group attacking London called themselves The Avenging Lefthand Indexfinger of Allah or something similar unimpressive... When they succeeded AQ "adopted" them. |
Re: Terrorists Quote:
|
Re: Terrorists I do agree in so many ways. The pen IS, indeed, mightier than the sword. The pen has become the sword, and the sword has become what people in ancient times believed to be the pen. The sword is now powerless, and the pen is almighty. Go, Eminem! Bash Bush! Maybe you'll shut these stupid politicians the f*** up... or fuel them, I'm not sure which Quote:
|
| All times are GMT -7. |
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2016, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.0 ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.