Who was the better american president: Clinton or Bush?

[DavetheFo]

Originally Posted by Tap112

Yeah...Better that didn't happen. That would have made him hate us a lot more. He might have then organized a plot to crash passenger jet planes into the World Trade Center or something.

Yeah go fuck off if you cant be bothered to repsond properly.

Learn how to form a proper argument for once, rather than just shooting your mouth off with the first brainless idea that pops into your head.

I am well aware of what happened on 9/11. However, things could have been worse. Why dont you go think about that, and go read a book on how to debate whilst you're doing so.

[Tap112]

Originally Posted by DavetheFo

Yeah go fuck off if you cant be bothered to repsond properly.

And you need to CHILL OUT or get out of this forum. Go make a thread in the Melee about it for all I care.

Originally Posted by DavetheFo

Learn how to form a proper argument for once, rather than just shooting your mouth off with the first brainless idea that pops into your head.

Learn to find out who you are talking to. Read other threads. I always have well formulated and fact based opinions. Don't insult my intelligence, cupcake.

Originally Posted by DavetheFo

I am well aware of what happened on 9/11. However, things could have been worse. Why dont you go think about that, and go read a book on how to debate whilst you're doing so.

Why dont you shut up about things you have no clue about. I could see the smoke and ashes from my house. My Dad was supposed to be in that building that day but his meeting got moved down the street. I know people that died in the World Trade Center. Do you? No, I highly doubt things would have been worse if Clinton captured him, even if we let him go after.

And thanks for the negative karma sweetie. Nice to know you dont have the guts to sign your name. Even nicer to know you can't handle a conversation like a mature adult.

[DavetheFo]

Originally Posted by Tap112

And you need to CHILL OUT or get out of this forum. Go make a thread in the Melee about it for all I care.

You came in here with the melee attitude.

Learn to find out who you are talking to. Read other threads. I always have well formulated and fact based opinions. Don't insult my intelligence, cupcake.

Cupcakes are nice. However, your lack of a decent well formulated and fact based opinion here isnt.

Why dont you shut up about things you have no clue about.

I always do, thats why I dont post in threads unless I know what they're about.

I could see the smoke and ashes from my house. My Dad was supposed to be in that building that day but his meeting got moved down the street. I know people that died in the World Trade Center. Do you? No.

You know what, you're wrong again. You're mind reading skills obviously read wrong. We have family in America, though less now thanks to Mr B-L.

I highly doubt things would have been worse if Clinton captured him, even if we let him go after.

Doubt? You seem to have lost your arrogant certainty of your previous post.

And thanks for the negative karma sweetie. Nice to know you dont have the guts to sign your name. Even nicer to know you can't handle a conversation like a mature adult.

I didnt sign my name, because, shock horror, I figured it'd be pretty obvious it was me.

Also, I can handle the argument like a mature adult, however, I do not like being bought down to melee level like you have bought yourself down to. Now, if we can get back on topic and discuss the point nicely, I'm sure the moderators wont eat me or you.

[Cap'n Rommel]

dont the pool speak for me

[DavetheFo]

Originally Posted by Irwin Rommel

dont the pool speak for me

Nope, its not a public poll, and it's usually good if you back up your vote with a reason.

[S.T.A.L.K.E.R.]

Wow, that was informative...... Which Bush? Why do you prefer Clinton, why do you dislike Bush? Some more thought into your post would be great.

[Tap112]

ummm...It's Peter Griffin from Family Guy. You really can't make fun of that.

and you can't really call someone a loser when you can't even spell the word correctly.

[GreatGrizzly]

im·peach ( P ) Pronunciation Key (m-pch)
tr.v. im·peached, im·peach·ing, im·peach·es

1. 1. To make an accusation against.
   2. To charge (a public official) with improper conduct in office before a proper tribunal.
   3. To challenge the validity of; try to discredit: impeach a witness's credibility.

Usage Note: When an irate citizen demands that a disfavored public official be impeached, the citizen clearly intends for the official to be removed from office. This popular use of impeach as a synonym of “throw out” (even if by due process) does not accord with the legal meaning of the word. As recent history has shown, when a public official is impeached, that is, formally accused of wrongdoing, this is only the start of what can be a lengthy process that may or may not lead to the official's removal from office. In strict usage, an official is impeached (accused), tried, and then convicted or acquitted.

http://library.thinkquest.org/25185/archfizz.htm

4. Under the Constitution, the House must vote on articles of impeachment. A simple majority vote can impeach the president-"impeachment" is more of an indictment than a conviction- and send the case to the Senate for trial.

Charges where brought against him, and the house said "Yes, we believe he did that."
When the accusations got to the Senate for trial, they laughed and acquitted (dropped the charges) him.

[Tap112]

Right, so did the Senate impeach him? No, the House did, then it was brought to the Senate floor and dismissed. You proved his point for him.

[GreatGrizzly]

The point im trying to prove is the "well he was impeached!" argument is not valid