Hell, go back and read the posts I have made in the past two pages. They will address every statement you made. If you have any questions, then come back.
Re: Who was the better american president: Clinton or Bush?
Its not about public speaking its about a total lack of knowledge about anything outside his 4 walls. Your links are related to Kerry and Bush, i dont recall mentioning Kerry anywhere, if i am somewhat mistaken please point out where. Also everyone knwos IQ tests are crap, they're socially based. As for grades at uni, who cares? Do you know the reasons why? Maybe it was poor teaching, maybe he was unwell on that day, theres a million reason but none are important. Its easy to mistake academic achievement with intelligence but they are different things.
Some one who is academic may just be able to write good essays, cram information in before an exam or even cheat on the work. Intelligence is the ability to learn, understand and make judgments or have opinions based on whats going on around them. These relate to people not just facts out of textbooks and to events that are going on now.
Bush's gaff are not just slips of the tounge but show unbelievable stupidity in my opinion. If i recall correctly, when Bush was asked to point to where Israel was on a world map he couldnt, a good sense of knowledge of the world then. On another occasion he met a girl called Charlotte Church and asked where she was from, she replied Wales, to which Bush replied 'What state is that?'. For those that dont know Wales is a COUNTRY next to England. Also relating to your previous posts, they dont address my issues with the exception of the hijackers laptop which i have also debated on. I wasnt asking questions anyway, i was stating my point of view.
Re: Who was the better american president: Clinton or Bush?
So all of the sudden one's scholastic grades no longer reflect their intellegence? In that case, the GPA that I worked hard for obviously means nothing, and toasted stoners should be able to get into Harvard.
Instead of making stupid claims based on hearsay, like Bush doesn't know where Israel is, why don't you find some good, unbiased support? It will make you look far more credible.
Re: Who was the better american president: Clinton or Bush?
Why dont you come up with some links to the topic being discussed, Clition or Bush, not Kerry. What i said was people who are not academic can still be intelligent and vice versa. I didnt say degrees were worthless, i said degrees do not necessarliy imply intelliegence. If it did we would have either intelligent people who were amazing at everything or 'thick' people who were crap at everything, the fact of the matter however is that people are good at different things, what some find easy other find hard. If it is purely intelligence, who is more intelligent, a person whos studies maths or a person who studies french? a person whos studies history or a person who studies biology? a person whos studies art or a person who studies engineering? a person whos studies sport science or a person who studies business? Im not saying everyone could do the work that you have done, but then is that because they're all thick or is maybe because they aren't interested in it, weren't taught well when younger, are crap at writing essays, get all panicked at exams? Maybe their good at things that require intellignece but arent tested at school. Again
Quote:
Some one who is academic may just be able to write good essays, cram information in before an exam or even cheat on the work. Intelligence is the ability to learn, understand and make judgments or have opinions based on whats going on around them. These relate to people not just facts out of textbooks and to events that are going on now.
As i said before people can just be good at exams and so do well at school, a historian may be able to tell you all about WWII but ask them to wire a televison for you, create a web page, desribe anothers cultures beliefs or thing of a new drug to solve aids and they may come up short. Surely an academic (and therfore intelligent) person would be able to do all this? Some people do admitably have a genetic disposition to find certain things harder. Issac Newton was infact reasonable to poor at school, is he thick?
Quote:
Instead of making stupid claims based on hearsay, like Bush doesn't know where Israel is, why don't you find some good, unbiased support? It will make you look far more credible.
What biased claims have i made? I saw the interview of bush not knowing where Israel was on English television, channel 4 i think if that helps you. Charlotte Church is a singer well know in Britian and also told about her encounter with Bush on television, it was on a BBC programme called 'Have I Got News For You'. My information about Clinton comes from 'http://www.whitehouse.gov', i hope these sorces aren't too biased for you. My quotes of what Bush have said he actually said and many can be viewed on video tape, i can provide the links for them if you so desire.
Re: Who was the better american president: Clinton or Bush?
Quote:
Originally Posted by IR15H
During the administration of William Jefferson Clinton, the U.S. enjoyed more peace and economic well being than at any time in its history. He was the first Democratic president since Franklin D. Roosevelt to win a second term. He could point to the lowest unemployment rate in modern times, the lowest inflation in 30 years, the highest home ownership in the country's history, dropping crime rates in many places, and reduced welfare roles.
Unemployment under Clinton was 5.6%. Under Bush it has so far hovered around that same mark. Last year the national average was actually 5.5%. Clinton did not create the prosperity he presided over; he contributed to the end of the boom that started under Reagan. Crediting Clinton entirely for that prosperity is like crediting Truman for the US victory in WWII or crediting Harding for the prosperity in the 20s. Truman only was president for the last 4 months of the war, and Harding was inept and presided over an extremely corrupt administration which probably hastened the coming of the great depression; he certainly did not create prosperity, he only presided over it. The case with Clinton and prosperity isn't that extreme, he presided over the last 7 years of the boom (about 1/3rd of its length), and, even though his tax increases slowed the economy down slightly, I don't think his policies lead to the recession at the end of his term. Recessions are natural and inevitable.
Quote:
You'd be niave to think Bush has never lied, all politians do, it seems to be part of their jobs.
Politicians lie, our constitution even gives congressmen amnesty from slander charges during a house or senate session. Clinton lied under oath while on trial for sexual harassment. The first is legal, the second is a crime, perjury, a felony that carries a sentence of 3-10 years.
A tribute to the one of finest pioneering groups in aerospace technology the world will ever know
Last edited by Blood n Guts; September 30th, 2005 at 11:59 AM.
Re: Who was the better american president: Clinton or Bush?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Blood n Guts
Unemployment under Clinton was 5.6%. Under Bush it has so far hovered around that same mark. Last year the national average was actually 5.5%. Clinton did not create the prosperity he presided over; he contributed to the end of the boom that started under Reagan. Crediting Clinton entirely for that prosperity is like crediting Truman for the US victory in WWII or crediting Harding for the prosperity in the 20s. Truman only was president for the last 4 months of the war, and Harding was inept and presided over an extremely corrupt administration which probably hastened the coming of the great depression; he certainly did not create prosperity, he only presided over it. The case with Clinton and prosperity isn't that extreme, he presided over the last 7 years of the boom (about 1/3rd of its length), and, even though his tax increases slowed the economy down slightly, I don't think his policies lead to the recession at the end of his term. Recessions are natural and inevitable. Politicians lie, our constitution even gives congressmen amnesty from slander charges during a house or senate session. Clinton lied under oath while on trial for sexual harassment. The first is legal, the second is a crime, perjury, a felony that carries a sentence of 3-10 years.
Congrats. Just fill in your name in place of the one already there, and you are an official member of The Vast Right Wing Conspiracy!
Re: Who was the better american president: Clinton or Bush?
for all those who support the war i would like to see you patroling iraq in 120+F. degrees. liveing conditions in iraq are worse. a bombing about everyday. the humvees are not fully armored and dount have air conditioning. i know it was hard under saddam for the iraqi people and how he killed some of them. but under his power he didnt have these bombing and gunfight in cities. the only reason to go to iraq was to make money. cheney has the company haliberton that is rebuilding iraq. also bush wanted to take over the oil fields of iraq. bush dousnt care about the people of iraq. while troops are dieing and being shot at in 120 degree weather, polititions are wondering if they should up armor the humvees and how much they are willing to spend on the soildier aquipment. and dount bring up somalia. it was a preacekeeping opperation to stop the genocide but it got ugly because of the rebels numbers. THERE ARE NO WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION IN IRAQ. stop watching FOX news and turn on something like CNN or MSNBC. has highest number of confused watchers. if you are smart you would read this http://www.alternet.org/story/16892 if your thinking clinton should of taken out osama then maybe we should of never given him weapons to fight the russians and there would be no twin towers attack. the russians would take over afganistan and make it a modern country with not osama.
"The Pentagon, however, has tried before to influence the media, especially the Iraqi media, and fell on its face."- BBC news
Re: Who was the better american president: Clinton or Bush?
Oh God, he found the Pub.
You SUCK AT LIFE.
I already did enlist in the Army as an infantryman, you tool. My uncle is serving his second tour as a squad leader in Iraq, he served his first in one of the mechanized units spearheading the drive into Iraq. Our Humvees are armored against small arms fire, no shit. RPGs and IEDs? Impossible.
He killed 250,000 people during his rule, that is not some. That is what we educated people call genocide.
That contract awarded to Haliburten was given out ten years ago, you twit.
The Democrats, like you, are the ones who say they do not want to spend money on new military technologies and armor. Practice what you preach.
You do know that the price of oil has gone up dramatically since 2003? And that the oil fields are not being run by Americans? Not a single fucking one!
Somalia got ugly because Clinton is retarded, pure and simple. Even Jeffro, the most knowledgeable liberal around here, knows that Somalia's failure was because of Clinton.
Iraq sold them or hid them. Shit, in 2000 Iraqi scientists defected to the US and confirmed our suspisions. Again, you are wrong.
You are right, CNN and MSNBC does have the highest number of confused viewers.
We did not give anything more than small arms and FIM-92A Stingers to the mujahideen fighters. This makes them want to attack us? Your logic is totally lacking, at absolute best. At worst, you are a plain retard.
OH MY GOD! THE RUSSIANS WERE PROTECTING AN UNPOPULAR COMMUNIST PUPPET GOVERNMENT! YOU THINK THAT IS GOING TO MAKE THEM MODERN? LOOK AT WHAT HAPPENED TO THE STATES LIKE KASAKHSTAN! Shit, do you even know where that IS?!
Re: Who was the better american president: Clinton or Bush?
calm down..... you must admit bush jr is one of the worst presidents. also i said FOX news has the highest number of confused viewers.(read the article in the link) communism is a popular form of govenment,look at china. china kills the most people of any country. why dount we invade them? im not democrat and im not republican. why arnt we going after osama with the full force of the US army. iraq did not cause 9/11. also i have a question. why is iraq still partialy in the stoneage?
"The Pentagon, however, has tried before to influence the media, especially the Iraqi media, and fell on its face."- BBC news
This site is part of the Defy Media Gaming network
The best serving of video game culture, since 2001. Whether you're looking for news, reviews, walkthroughs, or the biggest collection of PC gaming files on the planet, Game Front has you covered. We also make no illusions about gaming: it's supposed to be fun. Browse gaming galleries, humor lists, and honest, short-form reporting. Game on!
The Pub 
Re: Who was the better american president: Clinton or Bush? 
Linear Mode
