Teen gets sympathy from court after killing baby, could be released in 76 days.

[Col Jimmy Emeric]

Originally Posted by Swordmaster9

Exactly, You people are idiots if you feel sorry for her. She's making bull up, "i was so scared, I didn't know what to do Wha wha!" That is no excuse for drowning an innocent infant in a toilet.

but its kinda hard to judge a case when only given a page of text we dont know what all went on in the court. I do think she deserves some kind of punishment but i dont know what would fit this crime

[Yannick]

Kill a new-born by throwing it down a loo deserves years imprisionment to me.

[Cataphract]

A shame? She killed a living baby. This is even worse than abortion. She isn't insane either. She was a desperate woman who didn't want to take care of her baby, so she is making up a lot of bull so everyone will feel sorry for her.

I say she outta be hung or taken to a firing squad.

I can't stand it when people like X-C and NiteStryker make judgments in these sort of cases. They automatically assume (1) the person had full knowledge of what he/she was doing and did it because he/she was an 'evildoer', and (2) all 'evildoers' deserve to die.

An eye for an eye only makes the whole world blind.

Can we please stop assuming the worst about people? I admit that even I think she knew what she was doing. But her mind wasn't completely clear in what she was doing. She didn't kill her baby in cold-blood- it's not like she carefully planned it out. She panicked and did the wrong thing.

I'd say a case like hers requires less than a life sentence. No mental institution is required (she's not insane).
NO DEATH PENALTY!

[Μαjïç MushrøøM]

Originally Posted by Cataphract

I can't stand it when people like X-C and NiteStryker make judgments in these sort of cases. They automatically assume (1) the person had full knowledge of what he/she was doing and did it because he/she was an 'evildoer', and (2) all 'evildoers' deserve to die.

An eye for an eye only makes the whole world blind.

It is a very typical answer from those with a very conservative mentality, Cataphract, and is also often an easy solution to such a situation.

[NiteStryker]

Originally Posted by Cataphract

A shame? She killed a living baby. This is even worse than abortion. She isn't insane either. She was a desperate woman who didn't want to take care of her baby, so she is making up a lot of bull so everyone will feel sorry for her.

Originally Posted by Cataphract

I say she outta be hung or taken to a firing squad.

I can't stand it when people like X-C and NiteStryker make judgments in these sort of cases. They automatically assume (1) the person had full knowledge of what he/she was doing and did it because he/she was an 'evildoer', and (2) all 'evildoers' deserve to die.

(1) SOmeone doesnt 'accidentially' drown a baby dude...its a physical act.
(2) Why dont they? She killed an infant, why does she deserve to live?

Originally Posted by Cataphract

An eye for an eye only makes the whole world blind.

Thats why they invented brail :lol:

*Only a liberal would say that statement, BTW *

Originally Posted by Cataphract

Can we please stop assuming the worst about people? I admit that even I think she knew what she was doing. But her mind wasn't completely clear in what she was doing. She didn't kill her baby in cold-blood- it's not like she carefully planned it out. She panicked and did the wrong thing.

It doesnt matter. She killed. I dont care if she was stoned off her ass or if she couldnt be thinking clearer. She outta be put down. Mabey hang her infront of a firing squad

Originally Posted by Cataphract

I'd say a case like hers requires less than a life sentence. No mental institution is required (she's not insane).
NO DEATH PENALTY!

Good to know that in your eyes, an infant can perish at the hands of a moron and you would allow her to walk free after awhile. Remind me never to face you in a court of law. If you ever become a judge, you will work for the 9th Circut Court of Appeals in San Fransisco, T-H-E most liberal court in the world.

[Cataphract]

If you ever become a judge, you will work for the 9th Circut Court of Appeals in San Fransisco, T-H-E most liberal court in the world.

There you go again, assuming that the US is the only country in the World! Haha. Gotcha.

[Μαjïç MushrøøM]

There is nothing wrong with liberalism. The problem is that conservatives have made every effort possible to given it a bad name.

Apart from that, an infanticide, just like any other murder, does not necessarily make legitament for a second (human) to be murdered. Do two wrongs make a right? Or, does the fact that she murdered an infant make it the state's right to murder her?

[Cataphract]

You could make a case for Hammurabi's Code (an eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth, etc) by appealing to Personal Desert, but no one (not even conservatives) argue for this. If conservatives used Personal Desert to argue the death penalty here, they would have to face the fact that Market Capitalism does not follow Personal Desert, and would have painted themselves into a trap.

[Chubbs]

I would be happy if she has her uterus removed. That way she can screw as much as she wants, and not have to kill another baby. that way we all win

And cataphract, are you saying we should try to get her drowned in a toilet? (sorry that was a bad one)

[Cataphract]

Haha. No.