The 2004 Election Update Thread

[Red Menace]

Originally Posted by Großadmiral Dönitz

red menace your sign is incorrect (source: CNN), it should be (until all votes are counted for):

The Spam Party in '04 Spam Party

BUSH 254 KERRY 252
Last Updated:Nov 3, 9:59AM ET

I used Yahoo News not CNN (Communist News Network, very biased) Yahoo, I thought, gave a more far and balanced assesment (although I looked at both CNN and FoxNews). Also many states from there voting records where easy to guess. My native California, one of the most liberal states in the country was obviously going for Kerry.

[-Logic-Is-A-Virtue-]

California is not the most liberal, Massachusetts is. New Mexico and Iowa are most likely going to go to Bush, increasing his lead.

Sorry Google doesn' have Latin.
"De duobus malis, minor est semper elegendum."
Semper Fidilius is a saying for marines but forgot what it meant.

[SpiderGoat]

Originally Posted by -Logic-Is-A-Virtue-

Sorry Google doesn' have Latin.
"De duobus malis, minor est semper elegendum."
Semper Fidilius is a saying for marines but forgot what it meant.

W00t! You need a language to speak in, when you only want some people to understand you (though Dutch might be better).

"Of two evils, the lesser must always be chosen."

To those who don't like Bush:



Bush doesn't like you either.

[Akeate]

Ok, if you want to start using pictures:

[Revenge]

I think it is a bloody shame that Bush won. Americans "trusted" Bush simply because they had already seen what he could do. As for Blair, he will get re-elected. Britons actually look at the facts when voting. We don't vote for the person who can insult the opposition best, we look for the person who could lead the country best. Michael Howard and Charles Kennedy arn't good enough. They have made too many errors when confronting Blair that they now look like idiots. And we, unlike America, don't want idiots running our country.

[Biggus Dickus]

Election over.

Thread too.

Give us a break, please.