Like it or not, michael moores movie was politically driven, but it's no were near the "lies and half truths" as the republican elite want you to think it was.
Thats so untrue you make me want to believe OJ is spending the rest of life finding the real killer!!!
F 9/11 was Moore's version of the truth,....what he believes is the truth. It was pure propoganda and nothing less.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mihail
F 9/11 had alot of vailed points that are true and not bullshit as most republicans swear it is.
No it didnt. I didnt waste the time to watch it but I have heard so many analysists talking about it and nearly half the movie's clamins can be proven false easily.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mihail
This is not me just trying to stand up for michael moore, I could care less about him, but This is the same information I'v been saying on here since I'v joined.
Uh-huh....
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mihail
I found the movie to be much more truthful then one day of listening to republican radio, rush limbaugh and sean hannity.
Well thats why...Rush limbaugh? You expected something useful from him? :lol:
You want the truth listen to O'Reilly. *And do not call him a conservitive unless you have complete and unquestionable proof that he is or you are just spreading defmation and I will call you on it*
Thats so untrue you make me want to believe OJ is spending the rest of life finding the real killer!!!
F 9/11 was Moore's version of the truth,....what he believes is the truth. It was pure propoganda and nothing less.
Yeah keep telling yourself, and while your at it, also tell yourself that Saddam had connections with the Killers of 3000 americans.
Quote:
No it didnt. I didnt waste the time to watch it but I have heard so many analysists talking about it and nearly half the movie's clamins can be proven false easily.
you did not even see the movie and your talking about it? Yeah umm your opinions are now void about F 9/11.
Quote:
Uh-huh....
Indeed, thanks for agreeing with me. after all I am correct.
Quote:
Well thats why...Rush limbaugh? You expected something useful from him? :lol:
You want the truth listen to O'Reilly. *And do not call him a conservitive unless you have complete and unquestionable proof that he is or you are just spreading defmation and I will call you on it*
I have listened to O'reilly and his so called Factor, and his "no spin zone" but really, Bush Limbaugh and O'reilly are no different, they spew the same information and the same SPIN your repeating now after listening to him.
What exactly do you mean by "universal" truth? There is only one truth to any situation but there are an infinite amount of lies. I guess that is why our justice system sucks. There is also one best way to do something. It is a matter of opinion of whether to you it is the best. Best being defined as the fasted, easiest, least costly, and results in the geatest ratio of outcome (I.E. it is effecient).
So you say there is ONE truth. I'm in court, and I call my opponent an idiot, why saying that I'm not. He says I'm the idiot, and he's not. Who is lying?
"Do not go gentle into that good night,
Old age should burn and rave at close of day;
Rage, rage against the dying of the light."
The third option to that question is that you are both lieing, which can be the truth, and yes there is always one truth to any situation.
Truth is pure fact of what happened, what is, or what will happen with no opiniations, deletion of some aspects, or additions in anyway, shape, or form.
BTW is opiniations a word? If it isn't it should be.
This site is part of the Defy Media Gaming network
The best serving of video game culture, since 2001. Whether you're looking for news, reviews, walkthroughs, or the biggest collection of PC gaming files on the planet, Game Front has you covered. We also make no illusions about gaming: it's supposed to be fun. Browse gaming galleries, humor lists, and honest, short-form reporting. Game on!