You read wrong. Hitler did not provide Rommel with any of the supplies needed to hold the front, and did not plan to send the Waffers into North Africa.
Bear in mind that Rommel was Hitler's favorite General, after all it was Hitler that granted Rommel the command over the 7nd Panzer in France. Also, Rommel did receive some of the latest weapons in 1943, including Tigers, after he went to Berlin in order to ask for additional support. However, the Nazis never had any idea what to do with North Africa, but Rommel's success over there were useful to downplay the problems they encountered in Russia...
great General or not, he was still a thug who fought for the Nazis and was responsible for the deaths of thousands of Allied Servicemen. why do you hero worship someone like this?
[SIZE="1"]The one they love to hate to love.
[RIGHT]AzH is always right, naturally.[/RIGHT] [/SIZE]
[i]Permanently banned due to repeatedly violating the forum rules and ignoring staff warnings.[/i]
great General or not, he was still a thug who fought for the Nazis and was responsible for the deaths of thousands of Allied Servicemen. why do you hero worship someone like this?
Same could be said for any of the allied commanders. They were also responsible for the deaths of thousands of Axis servicemen. Does that make them any better than rommel, because they killed germans, instead of british and american servicemen? (if you awnser yes, you retarded and need to shut up.)
Same could be said for any of the allied commanders. They were also responsible for the deaths of thousands of Axis servicemen. Does that make them any better than rommel, because they killed germans, instead of british and american servicemen?
no, JP, that's crap. The Allies were defending against aggression. the Nazis & their man Rommel were the agressors. therefore, Allied Commanders did what they had to to end the war and stop Hitler's war machine from dominating Europe.
that is the very real difference between Axis & Allies. the reason why they fought.
Quote:
(if you awnser yes, you retarded and need to shut up.)
i answered yes, and i justified that answer. stop being a prick and making remarks like this.
[SIZE="1"]The one they love to hate to love.
[RIGHT]AzH is always right, naturally.[/RIGHT] [/SIZE]
[i]Permanently banned due to repeatedly violating the forum rules and ignoring staff warnings.[/i]
Same could be said for any of the allied commanders. They were also responsible for the deaths of thousands of Axis servicemen. Does that make them any better than rommel, because they killed germans, instead of british and american servicemen? (if you awnser yes, you retarded and need to shut up.)
There are no heroes in war.
Well, at least the allied countries didn't go around killing jews.
This informative post has been brought to you by Sh0wdowN: attacking your opinions 1-by-1.
Axis would be japan, italy, germany, hungary etc etc, while only the german SS were the ones killing the jews, so you can't say the axis were, because it was only a small percent of the german army who had nothing to do with the regular army, thats why Donitz was not hung for war crimes, and if given the chances rommel would not have been either.
This site is part of the Defy Media Gaming network
The best serving of video game culture, since 2001. Whether you're looking for news, reviews, walkthroughs, or the biggest collection of PC gaming files on the planet, Game Front has you covered. We also make no illusions about gaming: it's supposed to be fun. Browse gaming galleries, humor lists, and honest, short-form reporting. Game on!
The Pub 
Re: Rommel - 1891-1944 
He didn't do anything to the jews, no, but he was the one fighting for those who did. 
Linear Mode
