both sides lose, ecspecially the attackers. but i dont think there should be any reason to tell uninformed people about what israel does, or what other people did.ill tell you guys the truth: Muslims can be violent, but only when they are attacked. muslims NEED to defend themselves and all other religions need to defend themselves. we can sit and see muslims die everyday and NOT do anything about it because some one is oging to call muslims violent.
"I'm the 82nd Airborne. And this is as far as the bastards are going!"
israel will fall in the next 5-6 decades or so when america loses it's superpower status. america will stop backing israel, and then israel will wither and die.
So basically Israel is gonna fall and the rest of the Middle East will be unchanged... ok.... I don't think so. Everything is gonna change. You're thinking of the future of some things, without looking what will happen to other.
Israel could fall, and the other countries could get even poorer.
Last edited by Aeroflot; September 10th, 2004 at 07:11 PM.
Umm ok Islam is a religion of violence, but so is any other religion.
If you guys are all like, man Christianity is peacful, you are more wong then your are right. Infact the only reason why you don't have religious wars in the US is because of government. All religions are violent because it requires you to praise and devote yourself to one thing, if someone disagrees then someone is gonna get pissed off and be violent.
Umm... Why hasnt the Pope declared any sort of religious military action for centuries then? The closest thing any recent Pope did was challenge Hitler. Later, he challenged Stalin. Not militarily, peacefully.
I don't agree with this 'Islam=violent' bull. It's all crap.
Umm... Why hasnt the Pope declared any sort of religious military action for centuries then? The closest thing any recent Pope did was challenge Hitler. Later, he challenged Stalin. Not militarily, peacefully.
Well, the Vatican has almost no military power to speak of, so...
Umm... Why hasnt the Pope declared any sort of religious military action for centuries then? The closest thing any recent Pope did was challenge Hitler. Later, he challenged Stalin. Not militarily, peacefully.
Damn, bob was first.
The pope has no military power anymore. He used to control Rome, its surroundings, and have a lot of Italian dukes, lords,... as his allies. Apart from that, he could (and I'm speaking of the Middle Ages) excommunicate kings (worked pretty well, since - back then - almost everyone was religious), give financial support, pressure people,...
Oh, and the pope was a friend of Hitler. After the terrible things that had been done by Hitler were discovered, the Vatican tried to cover that up (I'm not saying they had anything to do with that, no, the pope wasn't THAT evil ).
"Do not go gentle into that good night,
Old age should burn and rave at close of day;
Rage, rage against the dying of the light."
This site is part of the Defy Media Gaming network
The best serving of video game culture, since 2001. Whether you're looking for news, reviews, walkthroughs, or the biggest collection of PC gaming files on the planet, Game Front has you covered. We also make no illusions about gaming: it's supposed to be fun. Browse gaming galleries, humor lists, and honest, short-form reporting. Game on!
The Pub 
Re: Islam- Religion of violence 
Re: Islam- Religion of violence 
). 
Linear Mode
