1184589

Re: Michael Moore

June 24th, 2004 11:10 PM

That’s right. So look out for the pile of shit that has evolved into a speaking pile of shit.

I always thought he was Canadian guess he just looks Canadian.

1184598

Re: Michael Moore

June 24th, 2004 11:14 PM

please explain to me how he is a liar, and regardless if he is fat and ugly, does that give you room to criticise him for that? if anything, he is standing up for the average american citizen and stating his view point as one. and what kind of purpose is there in indicating an anti-michael moore site anyway ? anyone that has a dislike for a person can easily do the same thing but that doesnt mean that their view-points on this person or their theories is concrete.

1184920

Re: Michael Moore

June 25th, 2004 03:24 AM

lol awesome...

Micheal Moore does exaggerate way too much. I'm sure he severely edits all these things. I love it when on the trailers all the house representives are like "no. i have nothing to talk about." or something. lol That's all our reactions. Who the hell would want to talk to Micheal Moore? I wouldn't be surprised if every other shot they're thirty feet ahead of where they were lol


Now this movie I wanna see lol
http://www.michaelmoorehatesamerica....ailer_lrg.html

OMG! the left one is so funny!

1185181

Re: Michael Moore

June 25th, 2004 07:01 AM

Noone of us can tell for sure if Michael Moore is a liar or not. Maybe he is, or maybe those people claim that are.
So instead of flaming Moore start to turn on your brains and try to find some arguments against the points he makes in his movie.
It seems in Bowling for Columbine he tried to find a reason why the US have such a problem with people killing other people. And his theory does seem to make sense.

1185204

Re: Michael Moore

June 25th, 2004 07:13 AM

If you'd read his books you'd see that he extensively uses a lot of resources and adds notes to almost anything he writes as to where his information came from.

1185215

Re: Michael Moore

X-C

June 25th, 2004 07:16 AM

Well he just exagerates stuff so much. Here is an example:

He sais that president Bush spent 48% of the first eight weeks in office on vacation. This is true. Half of those days he was either at his ranch or that presidential getaway place Fort Noxx or whatever. What Michail Moore purpously failed to mention was that while at these places he was having meetings with foreign leaders and doing his job at his vacation spots. I honestly see nothing wrong with that. It is like me taking my work from school and doing it at home. I am just moving it around. He purpously didn't add that to make it look like the president was slacking off 1/2 of his first eight weeks.

1185251

Re: Michael Moore

June 25th, 2004 07:27 AM

He exaggerates because his movies are propaganda
Still they have some valid points.

1187196

Re: Michael Moore

June 25th, 2004 05:53 PM

how is it possible to consider any of his work propaganda ? by saying that, does this make you someone whom is pro-bush, not to mention for the war in Iraq ?

I would have to disagree with anyone whom says that anything Michael Moore is exagerative. read any of his books [the book "dude,wheres my country" in particular] is filled with legitmate resources from where he has done extensive research.

And Genocyde, how do you know if he purposely left that little piece of information out? maybe he failed to mention that because it isnt relevent.

1187203

Re: Michael Moore

June 25th, 2004 05:56 PM

Michael Moore's, i think he is funny, dont take everything he says so personaily

1187235

Re: Michael Moore

June 25th, 2004 06:11 PM

Im definetly not pro Bush. But that Moore's latest movie is propaganda is pretty obvious (you know, it's published just before the elections and directly aimed at Bush). And there are a lot of strange stories going around about Bowling for Columbine, twisted facts and the such. I will probably never know for sure if that is true or not, so I think it's wise to be careful with what Moore says
He certainly knows his business, but I believe that his aims don't justify the methods he uses.


Maybe loz27 is right with what he said. There are a lot of hints in his movies that you shouldn't take him too seriously.