Cheating VS going new places
 

Ok, I have been called a cheater for this, but I dont believe its cheating.

In various levels, I go places that it isnt possible to go to alone, places where u need another person to jump on top of. Im not talking about sharking or using mods. X-ample- Omaha Beach lvl, the left bunker (if ur allied)/ right bunker (if ur axis), depending on ur view. There is a way to get on top of that bunker, all u need is another person. You can still get killed up there by snipers or nades or anything, but its supposedly a cheat. I dont believe so, othewise you wouldnt be able to access it. Other places (lvls) have this function, where u can get to a hard place with another person, and u can still get killed from there. Do you all think this is a cheat?

well. i agree that it isnt really a cheat, but if it upsets ppl then u really shouldnt do it then.

Re: Cheating VS going new places
 

It's actually an exploit. Day of Defeat has things like this in Avalanche for example where there's pink wallpaper, there's a way to get through that window and spawn kill the Allies from that vantage point.

While it's not a "cheat" it is an exploit. If there's an admin around be wary, 'cos he might kick you for it.

to me exploiting a glitch in the map is cheating u said if u r able to access it it isnt a cheat...yes it is thats like just because u can get a hack means its not a cheat the map makers didnt do that on purpose if they did there would be a ladder also u can get under the map in a lot of those places

hey, at least it isnt like the the flughafen map cheat. he can still be sniped and hiy by grenades. so i think it isnt sooooo bad.

Re: Cheating VS going new places
 

Well, such places like in 'The Hunt', with 1 other person, you can get on top of the church, and snipe all around the cannon, and still be killed. Its accassable, so I dont believe its a cheat, and I dont believe so many maps have so many glitches.

Re: Cheating VS going new places
 

yeah we know that but u still shouldnt do it if ppl are upset about it

how do you get on top of the omaha bunker? you said we could, but never said how

Re: Cheating VS going new places
 

Get another person, go to the left bunker (if ur axis), have the person crouch near the left side behind the bunker, jump on top of them, and then jump on2 the bunker, but u risk gettin sniped while tryin 2 get on top, but once on top,you can cover both cannons wit a sniper gun.

u can get on the church in the hunt by urself but u can also get under the level from there all places where u can get under the level should be off limits

Re: Cheating VS going new places
 

My theory is that if everyone can do it in the server, its not a cheat.

Re: Cheating VS going new places
 

Thats what I think, but us thinkers are few and lowering in numbers.

Re: Re: Cheating VS going new places
 

The sysop on the ESB server runs map fixes that keep you from getting to the place you aren't supposed to be.. i.e. landmines under the map to prevent sharking, boxes or planes or whatever blocking access to places players aren't supposed to be. Any place that isn't "fixed' in my opinion is fare game... that is unless you are asked by the people that run the server to stop. You outta do what they say, its their server, they pay for it, play by their rules

Minor

YA PORK CHOPS ALL OF YAS

ITS ONLY A FREAKIN COMPUTER GAME.I AGREE ITS NOT COOL TO BE A CHEAT BUT JUST SIT BACK AND KEEP COOL .......ITS NOT WORTH THE STRESS.........SOME PPL DON'T CHEAT AND HEY THE VAST MAJORITY DO SO DON'T STRESS :dance:

Re: Cheating VS going new places
 

What brought on the new guy and his, um, how to say this in an un-insulting manor, 'idea' (?) We were not gettinstressed about it. Read the WHOLE thread.

Really, if ya wanna insult people go to the alliedassault.com forums...

Minor