Best. Trailer. EVER.

[>Omen<]

Originally Posted by Admiral_Antilles

You cant blame IW for that, Or the release date or anything, Its just pure coincidence that it happened when it did.

True, it was already in the can when this recent incident happened, but certainly with what's been going on for some time it's still not exactly a good idea to have even planned it's inclusion in the first place.

[BadHairDẵy]

Buying it anyway.

[NiteStryker]

Originally Posted by Serio

I didn't say it wasn't. I just can't imagine a simple terrorist organization throwing the world into World War III over the death of a single man.

Ok. Can you imagine a death star blowing up a planet? Its a video game. Its not real life.

Originally Posted by Serio

World in Conflict did that, why didn't it get as overhyped as Modern Warfare II?

Because it wasnt as anticipated, wasnt as advertised, and didnt sell several million copies of the game beforehand, and wasnt part of a half decade long franchise?

Originally Posted by Serio

Sorry, but the story has been done a dozen times before,

As they all have

Originally Posted by Serio

the gameplay isn't anything new(judging from the videos)

I guess we will play it and find out...

Originally Posted by Serio

and unless they fixed the exploits in multiplayer, it won't be much of an improvement.

And you played the game to know this?

Originally Posted by MrFancypants

True, but there are games and then there are tasteless games. There is probably a game-concept that would be offensive to you as well, for example a "pedophile simulator".

Well considering that I dont have to buy it, it wouldnt really offend me. Its not something forced at me. Personally, country music pisses me the f*ck off. So you know what I do? I dont listen to it. Problem solved.

Originally Posted by MrFancypants

You might not think too well of someone who plays such a game, so don't be surprised if other people aren't happy when you play a game that simulates terrorist attacks on crowds of civlians.

Would it really suprise anyone if I enjoyed such a game?

Besides, who has not gone on a rampage in Grand Theft Auto, running over anything and everybody, or capped an annoying NPC in Fallout 3, or gotten pissed off at your AI teammates and shot / killed them and took their ammo? Its a video game.

Originally Posted by BadHairDẵy

Buying it anyway.

[BlitZ, The 57th]

I wonder, if they would allow underwater to land multiplayer maps.
Or
If they followed SW:Battlefront for the PSP, Underwater to Land to Aerial to Space maps! Man that would be fun and funny. Imagine a search and destroy mission and both teams are left with 1 man. One guy is underwater and the other is heading into space.

P.S. Oh wait we don't have easy Aerial to Space transports yet =/

[Killer Kyle]

I was really thinking that this was going to be a great game, but now I'm not sure.

But, I don't play much multiplayer and I was probably going to get it on the console anyway because I don't play PC much at the moment.

On the other hand, I was looking forward to the new co-op mode.

[Mr. Pedantic]

Because it wasnt as anticipated, wasnt as advertised, and didnt sell several million copies of the game beforehand, and wasnt part of a half decade long franchise?

And yet, from what IW has said about MW2, World in Conflict is a much better game than MW2 will ever be.

[S.T.A.L.K.E.R.]

It wouldn't be so bad if they hadn't waited until 1 month before launch to tell us about this shit.

If they would have announce the castration of the PC version and this IW.net crap 6 months ago I don't think there would be as big of a outcry, though I guarantee it would still be there

[Serio]

Originally Posted by Killer Kyle

I was really thinking that this was going to be a great game, but now I'm not sure.

But, I don't play much multiplayer and I was probably going to get it on the console anyway because I don't play PC much at the moment.

On the other hand, I was looking forward to the new co-op mode.

The story will be the only reason that I'm going to get it, at this point.
I never bothered with the multiplayer, as I got annoyed by servers filled to the top with people that exploited and cheated their way to Rank 55. However, if this IW.net stuff means that your rank, achievements, and weapons will be locked to an account located on a remote server, then I'll forgive the lack of dedicated servers.

[S.T.A.L.K.E.R.]

Originally Posted by Serio

The story will be the only reason that I'm going to get it, at this point.
I never bothered with the multiplayer, as I got annoyed by servers filled to the top with people that exploited and cheated their way to Rank 55. However, if this IW.net stuff means that your rank, achievements, and weapons will be locked to an account located on a remote server, then I'll forgive the lack of dedicated servers.

When you can't find a ping below 100, are stuck with no mods, custom maps or scripts you'll sing a different tune.

If I was on a server with cheaters or hackers, I just went to a different server. And after a while it got better as the anti-cheat methods were improved

[MrFancypants]

Originally Posted by NiteStryker

Well considering that I dont have to buy it, it wouldnt really offend me. Its not something forced at me. Personally, country music pisses me the f*ck off. So you know what I do? I dont listen to it. Problem solved.

You wouldn't have to buy it, but you'd have to accept the consequences of making the sale legal, in this case that might be increased social acceptance for paedophiles.

Ignoring a problem doesn't equal solving a problem. If you want to be apathetic that's fine, but don't pretend that it is a virtue.