| >Omen< | April 11th, 2008 10:11 PM | Re: WW II Gaming genre Officialy destroyed Quote:
Originally Posted by crisissuit3
(Post 4300142)
what were the names of those civil war games? | I used GameRankings.com and searched for Civil War. The most common ones for PC are the History Channel one, which got poor reviews on PC, and American Civil War: From Sumter to Appomattox, which rates 79% but appears to be a simple mouse click strategy game. It's also a very old game, 1996 release. Quote:
Originally Posted by rookiebombtech
(Post 4300752)
i no about that im just saying that there are other civil wars that could be used. a large numbe rof game devs are us and they make games orientated to the us of a but that can narrow down the market.
you dont think that the brits feel bad that most wwII games are american orientated :S | With all due respect to the Brits whom gave their lives in WWII, I would think the Russians would be even more upset that most WWII games focus on Americans because they lost more troops than any of the allied forces, over 20,000,000.
Games are always going to be slanted by those whom make them, it's just the way it is. Many of the best British battles pre WWII were short lived because the Brits had such a strong naval force, though I really don't think you'd like to see a game about the Revolutionary War, despite what dev team were to make it.
There are always going to be unsung heroes, that's why I think even WWII games haven't been fully exploited. There were very brave resistance forces from many countries that were vital to the war effort against the Nazis. Also, there were many snipers not given due credit like the Scottish Ghillies that trained the Brits how to stealth snipe and the many Russian women whom were expert snipers. |