August 1st, 2004
|
#2 |
| Gonnae no dae that
Join Date: November 14th, 2003 Location: Scotland Status: Who-me ? Rep Power: 0 | Re: How is this game compared to BF: Vietnam?? Quote: |
Originally Posted by Dash 8 BF: Vietnam pisses me off.
people (even the AI) buzzez around trying to get a kill usually with no tactics or co-operation at all! Besides, the speed of the game is just so weird, and it keeps lagging/stutter a lot, so all in all, an un-realistic game.
Take my conclusions of BF: Vietnam, is Joint Operations almost the same stuff? perhaps I should wait a few days for Doom III to be released, or perhaps some fellow forum members here could tell me a little about it? | Joint Ops I would say is worth gettin ,Online play is good ,i find it lags less than BFV and the Helos easier 2 fly ,the game looks fresh on the updated BHD engine ,and if u want good team work join a clan , theres plenty lookin 4 recruits ,if u dont want 2 join a clan there players out there that will join up with u 2 complete a objective anyway, in any team game u get a few lonewolfs its usally newbies gettin used 2 the game or snipers.The games r simular but i think joint ops wins it, thats my thoughts on it.And 4 Doom 3 i think the singleplayer side will b great but multy wont b a patch on the other games already out there, Im gonnae buy Doom 3 & HL2 but ill still b playin Joint Ops aswell |
Jacobite :tommy: |
| |