Quote:
Originally Posted by Anchovy Casserole Maybe not a mental problem per se, but every experience leading up to a moment shapes who a person is. And if it has become a habit for a person to act on rage or frustration without thinking, that's when it gets dangerous. One day it could be punching a hole through a wall. A year later if that sort of self-control issue hasn't been addressed, it could be something like this. |
Maybe. But at the same time... there's a theme in society where there are absolutely no consequences for being a total ass. Perhaps he shouldn't have run them over, but at the same time they shouldn't have been there in the first place.
At some point you have to decide whether you want a society in which people are total arseholes as long as they don't
physically hurt anyone, or whether you want a society where the bar for manners is a bit higher but there's a bit more by way of deaths or serious injuries - where if someone ticks you off, you hop in your car and run them down. Those aren't the only two options on the table, but they're the extremes and the compromises are between those two points.
I'd be inclined to lean towards the latter. There are more people alive in the former, but it's a world that's significantly worse to live in.
One possible compromise to this... democratised use of violence. Of anger with lethal consequence. Is that people intervene earlier in the story on both sides. That those people are taught manners and he's taught a bit about restraining his anger, and that squares the circle, so to speak.
Compromises, however, don't seem to be something that most people are interested in. They seem to want to take a stand on their 'rights,' regardless of how much they shit things up for everyone around them. It's an entitlement complex, and it's so at odds with reality, so one-sided an account of society, that occasionally people they're affecting decide or feel that it's not worth buying into any more.
That's not necessarily an anger management problem, or a mental problem, or anything of the sort, (though it probably most readily manifests in people whose coping mechanisms are poor
or overloaded.) They can have been managing more than their fair share of getting shat on for years beforehand. It's closer to a value judgement. "I'm not interested in being part of this any more. Why have a civilisation if we're not interested in being civilised?"
At which point, even if later they might think differently, there are no significant restraints on their actions. It's an all in or all out kinda thing.