Re: Rugby fan can't explain self-mutilation [Darwin Award finalist?]
 

Never realized you had to actually die. But that does make sense.

Re: Rugby fan can't explain self-mutilation [Darwin Award finalist?]
 

Damn, how does one do that?

Re: Rugby fan can't explain self-mutilation [Darwin Award finalist?]
 

Do what? Die? There are a number of ways, too many to list, in fact.

Or if you meant how does one cut off his testes? It was explained that he used wire cutters. I personally think that's rather inefficient, but to each his own, I guess.

Re: Rugby fan can't explain self-mutilation [Darwin Award finalist?]
 

I'm guessing this was pretty close to the mark.
http://www.acclaimimages.com/_galler...09-2912_TN.jpg

Re: Rugby fan can't explain self-mutilation [Darwin Award finalist?]
 

You know, I can imagine that being the case.

Re: Rugby fan can't explain self-mutilation [Darwin Award finalist?]
 

:cort:

God...what an idiot. No victory can possibly be big enough to have to do that, you just don't do that, no matter what...

Re: Rugby fan can't explain self-mutilation [Darwin Award finalist?]
 

NO, NO, NO, NO, NO! *pulls gigantic Darwin Award book off from shelf*

"Contenders are evaluated using the following five criteria...The candidate must remove himself from the gene pool."

And later:
"The potential winner must therefore render himself deceased, or at least incapable of reproducing."

Bam.

Re: Rugby fan can't explain self-mutilation [Darwin Award finalist?]
 

owww that would hurt sooooooooo bad

Re: Rugby fan can't explain self-mutilation [Darwin Award finalist?]
 

Ah, I remember a thread on this awhile back.

That's crazy, I don't know how he could do it. And what's even worse, is that he proved that he'd do it by actually walking down to the club and showing his friends...

Re: Rugby fan can't explain self-mutilation [Darwin Award finalist?]
 

He's lucky to be alive. If he had passed out at the wrong time during the procedure he might not be around at all.