Great job but bye - Page 3

***Mike 51*** · September 27th, 2003

1 shot 1 kill works great. Just wait and see, I've been playing for a few hours and it's stunning.

Absolutely perfect.

***DeathwingPanzer*** · September 27th, 2003

I have played Fh and i love it, esspecially the realism (one shot kill). The only problem I have is that my graphics card (9600 pro) has been freaking out (just installed it thursday).

***Mudda*** · September 27th, 2003

Quote:

Originally Posted by Archangel85

you can't do teamplay when no one plays the game...plus few ever listens to radiocommands, or chat messages...everone just wants to get the point, no one wants to stay back and cover somebody...if FH is as described, I predict a similar fate to XWWII - no servers, no players.

Are u SEVERLY reatarded? Or myabe just far right wing. It had been ONE day, acctually, not even one day since its release. Please explain how you can judge the mod after that space of time. I think the FH mod is great a its an alternative and its fun too with great vechiles, planes and ships etc. And i also want to make the point that it is its 1st release! This version hasnt even been updated with all the stuff that was planned for this release (unfornunately some of it didnt come) and we will get more additions too! And hey...its free.

Blehh · September 27th, 2003

1 shot 1 kill makes it more like real war. You don't just charge an MG42 position with an Enfield. It promots tactical strategy. I like the realism.

But as Coolguy said, it's your opinion and that's fine with me. Some people like realism, others like arcade.

***ww2freak*** · September 27th, 2003

I disagree too. I think that finally you have that adrenaline rush, cause you have to be on guard every time, not to die. I fannaly get the Medal of Honour danger feeling + great maps and vehicles.

Aleluia!!!!

***Gnarg!*** · September 27th, 2003

As evry1 seems to be here and the other threads are dead... I have a problem, the game freezes flashes, and then continues as normal in 10 minutes, then the same thing happens, repat repat, i really need some help

***Muddy S*** · September 27th, 2003

I am completly for the current damage system but one thing really lets it down.
I think the current control system of BF restricts the use of effective cover, which results in getting killed alot when you acctually think your concealed. For example when lying prone and you crawl over a edge you are actually alot further over the edge than how far you think you are if you get what I am saying. It seems when lying prone the camera is in your belly!

Call of duty is a good example of what it should be like where you can lean round corners to shoot, im not sure if you would be able to impliment this but if you could it would make the game a whole lot better.

Another problem is that you know in Exp WW2 the tanks shells fire like bullets, and in it tank battles last 3 seconds if your lucky, you could implement a fire delay from clicking, hearing, click- "FIRE"- Boom. just an idea

***Major Lee High*** · September 27th, 2003

Id much rather have instakill infantry fighting and decent vehicles fighting than like dc... where the infantry fighting takes a few shots, but each vehicles just gets blown up instantly....

***Beast of War*** · September 27th, 2003

I played FH for several hour too and the rifle damage system is great ! I hope they never really change that. Those who don't want to kill with 1 aimed shot can always use submachineguns, i noticed they are less powerfull as they should be since they fire pistol ammo.

***Archangel85*** · September 27th, 2003

okay, i played it, and the aiming/damage system is way better than in XWWII...but it lags a little bit on atlantic or in bocage when you fire your machineguns in a plane...