![]() |
Re: Newsupdate May 22nd Nice update, FH team :) Just an observation, however... the scale of the vehicles seems a little off, but that may just be the angle of the pic. The Panzer II would have been about 25cm taller than the SdKfz 251 in the background, but it looks shorter. Also, the Panzer III would have been almost 65cm taller than the SdKfz 251, yet it doesn't look much taller at all sitting directly beside it, as well. Like I said, though, it may just be the pic... http://forgottenhope.bf1942files.com...anzer2c_02.jpg Anyway, good job as usual :) |
Re: Newsupdate May 22nd Sizes are just fine, not a perfect angle for size comparison. |
Re: Newsupdate May 22nd Quote:
*cricket* *cricket* Can't we get some Allied vehicles soon? Specifically the A13... Somewhat important, after all. |
Re: Newsupdate May 22nd Quote:
|
Re: Newsupdate May 22nd Great job Duke!:D |
Re: Newsupdate May 22nd This update looks kind of small - the amount of comments. Maybe people are just busy playing the new maps. p.s.: Nothing from McGibs?! |
Re: Newsupdate May 22nd Quote:
I'm also anxious to see the 109. C'mon, you can't ell me you're not anxious to see either the Pz4, Tiger, or 109?:naughty: About what Takiwa said. For a little while I've been wondering if something seemed a bit off as well. For a long time we heard that vehicles will seem much larger than they are in FH1 because of BF's scaling but the ingame FH2 screens don't give me the impression that these same vehicles are that much bigger, then I had wondered if I just needed to see a player model next to them to get a better sense of scale, but since we don't have those yet it's still deceiving to my eye at times. |
Re: Newsupdate May 22nd I'm still intrigued about the antenna... |
Re: Newsupdate May 22nd Quote:
Nothing wrong with that... Tanks where a major part of ww2 and IMO Awesome. |
Re: Newsupdate May 22nd Quote:
Quote:
it has one now |
| All times are GMT -7. |
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2016, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.0 ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.