FileFront Forums
Page 3 of 6 12 3 45 Last »
Show 50 post(s) from this thread on one page

FileFront Forums (http://forums.filefront.com/)
-   Forgotten Hope General Yib-Yab (Off Topic) (http://forums.filefront.com/forgotten-hope-general-discussion-483/)
-   -   General Inaccuracies (http://forums.filefront.com/forgotten-hope-general-discussion/119382-general-inaccuracies.html)

|KFG|Hell_March April 10th, 2004 11:27 AM
Re: General Inaccuracies
 
Actaully I havent seen 1 panzer 3 in fh yet. Though there not exceptionally great it would be nice to bridge the gaps between the panzer2 and 4's

Ohioan April 10th, 2004 11:33 AM
Re: General Inaccuracies
 
There is no PanzerIII in now, and that's the problem. I'm sure the team will add them in .62, because a lot of people have asked for them.

Count Nosferatu April 10th, 2004 11:44 AM
Re: General Inaccuracies
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ohioan
I agree with most of this post -- the PanzerIV skins are GREAT and don't need changed, and the G43 model is also great. Now what's a Ge98? I've never heard of it. If it's a slight variation of either the G43 or the K98 then I doubt we'll see a completely new model.
G43 is somewhat long [hit external cam to see]... it was much shorter IRL...

Ge98 is the german standard issue rifle in WWI... copious amounts of them were used in WWII as well to make up for the lack of K98s. The K98 was essentially a shortened down version of the G98... which did not affect much the performance or capabilities of the existing gun but made it easier to handle.

Artie Bucco April 10th, 2004 11:48 AM
Re: General Inaccuracies
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Count Nosferatu
G43 is somewhat long [hit external cam to see]... it was much shorter IRL...

Ge98 is the german standard issue rifle in WWI... copious amounts of them were used in WWII as well to make up for the lack of K98s. The K98 was essentially a shortened down version of the G98... which did not affect much the performance or capabilities of the existing gun but made it easier to handle.

Seems stupid to remodel an old variation of a weapon. Sure it saw action but no point in reinventing a hammer.

TheWharGoul April 10th, 2004 11:50 AM
Re: General Inaccuracies
 
What you said about the Tiger I.. Are you saying it shouldnt be able to turn as fast as it does? The Tiger I had the ability to turn itself around very fast.. Much much faster then its turret could turn. hence why a lot of tiger aces use to be in Stugs. because they were use to having to turn the whole tank, and used it a lot.

Count Nosferatu April 10th, 2004 11:52 AM
Re: General Inaccuracies
 
I meant the Turret...

judge reinhold April 10th, 2004 11:54 AM
Re: General Inaccuracies
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Beast of War
Else what is the DICE made RTR and SW of WWII expansion PAK 75 mm and Stug doing in FH ? That wasn't part of a patch new added vehicle......
The pak40 was added into the patch with caen, so Armin said that since it's in a patch, normal mods can use it. Same with that helicopter on alpen. And what stug is from RTR? The one subbo made from scratch to replace the old FH one?

the_unborn April 10th, 2004 12:06 PM
Re: General Inaccuracies
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Count Nosferatu
I meant the Turret...
I don't understand you completely :uhm:
Is the turret speed too slow or too fast in your opinion? Cause me and most of us here think that its perfect right now. :D

Count Nosferatu April 10th, 2004 12:09 PM
Re: General Inaccuracies
 
The turning rate [of the turrets] of some tanks is waaaaay too fast... eg the Tiger's rate is more accurate when the tank is burning flaming than when normally

the_unborn April 10th, 2004 01:05 PM
Re: General Inaccuracies
 
All right, we solved the mistery :)


All times are GMT -7.
Page 3 of 6 12 3 45 Last »
Show 50 post(s) from this thread on one page

Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2016, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.0 ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.