Yeah but guys, Im looking in the price range of 100-150,alot of these things are like 230 bucks.
*After a drive-by shooting*
"Hey Lois, why don't we move to England? The worst they have there are drive-by arguments,"
*England*
"Hey Neville, isn't that Stuart?" " I believe it is"
*Drives by*
"Hey Stuart...I DISAGREE!" *Drives away*
-Family Guy
In that case... yeah.
I'm throwing my vote in for either a 9600XT (yes, these can be had in--or at least close to--that range; I paid $160 for mine) or a 9800SE.
Odd results I think when testing my system with FRAPS.
The link I posted to the vidcard reviews was a P4 3.2GHz with 512MB DDR RAM, and a Nvidia 5900. Toms used FRAPS and BF1942:SWOWW2 to get their comparison results.
Their system showed hte Ti4200-128MB ran about 90.5 fps
My system is a AMD XP2200 Thoroughbred with 512MB DDR333, and a Ti4200. I am running on average about 99-100fps.
If i am running the same fps as the P4 3.2GHz system doesnt that mean the graphics card is running as fast as it can and even if you put it in a 4GHz system its still gonna max out around 100fps?
Prokhorovka runs great at about 85fps in the IL-2 until I go to strafe the german base with cannons and rockets. It drops to about 15 fps.
Well its winded down to either anything in the 9800 or 9600 chipset or an NVIDIA Geforce FX 5200.
*After a drive-by shooting*
"Hey Lois, why don't we move to England? The worst they have there are drive-by arguments,"
*England*
"Hey Neville, isn't that Stuart?" " I believe it is"
*Drives by*
"Hey Stuart...I DISAGREE!" *Drives away*
-Family Guy
This site is part of the Defy Media Gaming network
The best serving of video game culture, since 2001. Whether you're looking for news, reviews, walkthroughs, or the biggest collection of PC gaming files on the planet, Game Front has you covered. We also make no illusions about gaming: it's supposed to be fun. Browse gaming galleries, humor lists, and honest, short-form reporting. Game on!