Pros and Cons of BF: Vietnam - Page 7

striderx2048 · March 22nd, 2004

educate the sheep. stop giving EA your money

***el bandito*** · March 22nd, 2004

Quote:

Originally Posted by ManiK_Impressive

i read in the penny arcade interview that the americans speak vietnamise(sp?)

The GIs speak English. It's the South Vietnamese who speak Vietnamese. They fought against the North Vietnamese too.

***ron moron*** · March 22nd, 2004

I think BFV is a blast, the helis handle really well and it doesn't take long to get some decent tactics going with small groups, plus the city maps are just amazing.

Can't say I've played all the maps as I'm running it on a Pentium 3 750 which is below their minimum spec so some maps just give up straight away.

***virtus*** · March 22nd, 2004

a other ripof evil arts!

***BlitzPig_Machine*** · March 23rd, 2004

BF:1942 is arcadish too...

Again, it's not the GAME BF:V that you should be critical of, it's what the engine can or cannot do.

Remember that whole mod thing?

***LIGHTNING [NL]*** · March 23rd, 2004

Somehow I get 3 times as much FPS in BF1942 as in BFV with the same settings. For the rest I think it's ok, not much better than BF1942 vanilla gameplay-wise.

***virtus*** · March 23rd, 2004

frigging laggy got it to day i regret it already, do not get that sijty game until its good or a patch is out.

***zero_zero*** · March 23rd, 2004

I'm not gonna buy Battlefield because I already have Battlefield
I think a Vietnam add-on for BF1942 would be the same and a lot cheaper.

Admiral Donutz · March 23rd, 2004

OMG some of you acctually bought bf: V? I knew that it would be crappy (filled with mayor and minor bugs) its published by EA,that says enough...

striderx2048 · March 23rd, 2004

mods shouldnt have to come to the rescue for bfv to make it a success, exspecially for an EA product. they already suckard us once with bf42, but in that case it was first of its kind, so it got a pass.