Notices

Go Back   FileFront Forums > The Games! > Battlefield Series > Battlefield Mod: Forgotten Hope > Forgotten Hope General Yib-Yab (Off Topic)

Remember Me?

Forgotten Hope General Yib-Yab (Off Topic)
Discuss on the bf1942 FH mod here!

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old January 9th, 2004   #21
DiCE/EA: Ambiguously Gay Duo
Council Member
 
striderx2048's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 16th, 2002
Status: Available
2,106 posts, 0 likes.
Rep Power: 31
striderx2048 is a n00b
Default Re: M26 Pershing

but the facts are the facts. blame history.

"Ask them, US and Brits didn’t do squat in WW2, it was won by the Soviet all by themselves versus the entire Germans Army and they did it while standing on one leg and with a arm tied behind their back. Western Europe, North Africa, Italy were all side shows" -unknown poster
striderx2048 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 9th, 2004   #22
Herr Oberst Feldmarschall
Royal Guard
 
Oberst Topgun's Avatar
 
Join Date: August 8th, 2003
Location: Good ol' Germany
Status: Hunting for Information and Easter Eggs
929 posts, 0 likes.
Rep Power: 26
Oberst Topgun should make some friends
Send a message via ICQ to Oberst Topgun
Default Re: M26 Pershing

i was reffering on facts, and fact is, they did fight in ww2, unlike the is3 for example, so my point is: yes to the pershing for fh
Oberst Topgun is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 9th, 2004   #23
DiCE/EA: Ambiguously Gay Duo
Council Member
 
striderx2048's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 16th, 2002
Status: Available
2,106 posts, 0 likes.
Rep Power: 31
striderx2048 is a n00b
Default Re: M26 Pershing

Quote:
Originally Posted by Oberst Topgun
i was reffering on facts, and fact is, they did fight in ww2, unlike the is3 for example, so my point is: yes to the pershing for fh
Yes only to the Pershing only the in battles it did take part in. I sense this discussion is going down the road of the "prototype" polish SMG

"Ask them, US and Brits didn’t do squat in WW2, it was won by the Soviet all by themselves versus the entire Germans Army and they did it while standing on one leg and with a arm tied behind their back. Western Europe, North Africa, Italy were all side shows" -unknown poster
striderx2048 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 9th, 2004   #24
GF is my bext friend *hugs GF*
 
Shade_PW's Avatar
 
Join Date: October 5th, 2003
Location: Strange blue planet
Status: I liek Forgotten Hope
806 posts, 0 likes.
Rep Power: 26
Shade_PW is a n00b
Default Re: M26 Pershing

Quote:
Originally Posted by striderx2048
Yes only to the Pershing only the in battles it did take part in.
Ditto.
Shade_PW is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 9th, 2004   #25
FH dev & JagdPanther lover
 
Turbo_tiger(DK)'s Avatar
 
Join Date: October 22nd, 2003
Location: Denmark
Status: Available
276 posts, 0 likes.
Rep Power: 0
Turbo_tiger(DK) is a n00b
Default Re: M26 Pershing

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lobo
As you know we need to make some good oponents for the KingTiger, about the americans maybe the Pershing is the only decent one, but I have read that it was not really used in the Western front and that it was mainly used in the Pacific, in the Okinawa battle.
Is this true?, were there Pershings in Europe, maybe not a lot but in small number?
Well in terms of one on one performance the M26 is probably the only US tank that can match the King Tiger. But there were some good Sheman variants that would be nice to have in FH. The M4A3E8 "Easy Eight" is one the M4A3E2 Jumbo is another. The first 20 pre production T26E3's were rushed to Europe in Jan 1945 after the Ardennes scare.(Still called T26 then, in Mar 1945 it was accepted operationally and now renamed as the m26)

A decent (but also late) British tank was the Cruiser Comet, with 100mm armour and a 17 pounder it was able to face Tigers & Panther on even terms. I started coming of the production line in Sep 1944, and in 1944 143 were built, in 1945 985 were built.
Turbo_tiger(DK) is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 9th, 2004   #26
The Internet ends at GF
 
Join Date: November 30th, 2003
Location: France
Status: made in france
107 posts, 0 likes.
Rep Power: 0
Mister-T is a n00b
Default Re: M26 Pershing

Killorlive et reslin, vous devriez faire un petit passage en france \o/
Mister-T is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 9th, 2004   #27
I would die without GF
 
Anlushac11's Avatar
 
Join Date: April 28th, 2003
Location: Babylon 5
Status: Available
15,517 posts, 41 likes.
Rep Power: 0
Anlushac11 is dead sexehAnlushac11 is dead sexehAnlushac11 is dead sexehAnlushac11 is dead sexehAnlushac11 is dead sexehAnlushac11 is dead sexehAnlushac11 is dead sexehAnlushac11 is dead sexehAnlushac11 is dead sexehAnlushac11 is dead sexehAnlushac11 is dead sexeh
Default Re: M26 Pershing

The Comet was a very sweet tank and was everything the Cromwell should have been. The 77mm gun was a short barrel version of the 17lbr and fired the same ammo.

My data says the hull was 76mm front and 29mm sides and turret front was 102mm and turret sides were 64mm. But the Comet still had vertical armor and took no advantage of sloping. Meaning that just about any German A/T gun 75mm or over firing PzGr 39 ammo could penetrate the frontal armor at medium to long range.

Basically it was a better Cromwell with a kick ass gun. But I would not want to go head to head with a Tiger or Panther in it. Say one thing for the Germans they sure knew how to build kick ass canons.

If the war had continued it would have been the Centurion that would have gone toe to toe with Tigers and Panthers, especially since the Black Prince was cancelled (Super Churchill with 17lbr). The Brits rushed a squadron of Centurions to Germany in April of 1945 but none saw action, war ended about 2 weeks later. I have never found any indication they ever even saw an enemy tank.

Centurion had 120mm hull front, 76mm front hull side, 51mm hull side rear, 110mm turret front and 76mm turret side. BUT the armor was sloped in front and the turret was rounded and no shot traps. And it carried the 17lbr., later a 20lbr. A/T gun.


BTW I do agree that a Easy Eight Sherman with its improved armor and better cross country performance would be a welcome addition to the game, as well as the Jumbo.

Last edited by Anlushac11; January 9th, 2004 at 07:53 AM.
Anlushac11 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 9th, 2004   #28
FH tester
 
MkH^'s Avatar
 
Join Date: September 24th, 2003
Location: Finland
Status: Just posting
2,355 posts, 0 likes.
Rep Power: 28
MkH^ has been known to help peopleMkH^ has been known to help people
Default Re: M26 Pershing

Correct me if im wrong, but wasn't Firefly able to take out a King Tiger quite easily with shot to side of the hull if it got a chance.. It was 80mm, wasn't it? Does it really need a counterpart, if it did not have one in real life? In my opinion, it need only a clever opponent.
MkH^ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 9th, 2004   #29
This is not nam
 
Big Lebowski's Avatar
 
Join Date: December 6th, 2003
Location: Copenhagen
Status: Available
2,017 posts, 0 likes.
Rep Power: 28
Big Lebowski is someone we should all be proud ofBig Lebowski is someone we should all be proud of
Default Re: M26 Pershing

Quote:
Originally Posted by MkH^
Does it really need a counterpart, if it did not have one in real life? In my opinion, it need only a clever opponent.
I Agree

Last edited by Big Lebowski; January 9th, 2004 at 08:08 AM.
Big Lebowski is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 9th, 2004   #30
Such a mean old man
 
Join Date: September 15th, 2003
Status: Available
211 posts, 0 likes.
Rep Power: 0
MeanMrMustard has disabled reputation
Default Re: M26 Pershing

Im guessing the thing about not wanting tank crews to go after enemy tanks was because tanks weren't supposed to be taking out other tanks, they were designed for primarily infantry support roles, it was the Tank Destroyers, such as M10's etc. that were supposed to go after the tanks. Of course I dont think the rule was stuck too very often, but that was the initial intention, hence the reluctance to upgun the sherman. But yeh, it was still a stupid decision.
Harry
MeanMrMustard is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -7.







   
 





This site is part of the Defy Media Gaming network

The best serving of video game culture, since 2001. Whether you're looking for news, reviews, walkthroughs, or the biggest collection of PC gaming files on the planet, Game Front has you covered. We also make no illusions about gaming: it's supposed to be fun. Browse gaming galleries, humor lists, and honest, short-form reporting. Game on!

FileFront Forums - Terms of Service - Top
Theme Selection
Copyright © 2002-2016 Game Front. All rights reserved. Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2016, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Forum Theme by Danny King (FileTrekker), Sheepeep & Graeme(rs)
RSS Feed Widget by FeedWind