Notices

Go Back   FileFront Forums > The Games! > Battlefield Series > Battlefield Mod: Forgotten Hope > Forgotten Hope General Yib-Yab (Off Topic)

Remember Me?

Forgotten Hope General Yib-Yab (Off Topic)
Discuss on the bf1942 FH mod here!

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old January 13th, 2004   #171
I would die without GF
 
Anlushac11's Avatar
 
Join Date: April 28th, 2003
Location: Babylon 5
Status: Available
15,517 posts, 41 likes.
Rep Power: 0
Anlushac11 is dead sexehAnlushac11 is dead sexehAnlushac11 is dead sexehAnlushac11 is dead sexehAnlushac11 is dead sexehAnlushac11 is dead sexehAnlushac11 is dead sexehAnlushac11 is dead sexehAnlushac11 is dead sexehAnlushac11 is dead sexehAnlushac11 is dead sexeh
Default Re: M26 Pershing

Quote:
Originally Posted by BlitzPig_Machine
Actually...it's all relative to the ground pressure.

Ground pressure on the T-34/85 is 12.35 psi (very similar to the Pershing and Tiger btw). The T-34/76 is 10 psi. The Panzer IV was whopping 12.8 (the Panther too). The Panzer II was 11.3 psi. The M-24's is like 11.01 psi. Not bad at all actually. The T-34 is obviously designed with that in mind.

Pretty good for a "light" tank.
That seems high for the Panther. It has wide battletracks like the Tiger I and weighs 10 tons less. The more surface area per ton should mean less ground pressure.
Anlushac11 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 13th, 2004   #172
Repeat Sex Offender
 
Blistex²'s Avatar
 
Join Date: November 20th, 2003
Location: Tiger I Turret
Status: Available
313 posts, 0 likes.
Rep Power: 26
Blistex² is a n00b
Default Re: M26 Pershing

Quote:
Originally Posted by BlitzPig_Machine
Actually...it's all relative to the ground pressure.

Ground pressure on the T-34/85 is 12.35 psi (very similar to the Pershing and Tiger btw). The T-34/76 is 10 psi. The Panzer IV was whopping 12.8 (the Panther too). The Panzer II was 11.3 psi. The M-24's is like 11.01 psi. Not bad at all actually. The T-34 is obviously designed with that in mind.

Pretty good for a "light" tank.
While that's essentially true, the wider tracks allowed better turning in mud and snow, and a allowed the tank to float better on the wet ground. While the ground pressure might be the same or even less on thin tracked tanks, the wider tracked ones (that had a slightly higher ground pressure) usually had the edge over them.

Blistex² is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 14th, 2004   #173
Addicted to GF
 
BlitzPig_Machine's Avatar
 
Join Date: October 1st, 2003
Status: Available
252 posts, 0 likes.
Rep Power: 0
BlitzPig_Machine is a n00b
Default Re: M26 Pershing

All the information I have seen for the Panther puts the ground pressure between 12.5 and 13 psi. I'm not saying that's the number, but that's what I keep seeing. And I am open to other stuff.

And ground pressure's tricky...but track thickness is inherent in the psi number, after all it's just a question of surface area/weight. Wider tracks = lower ground pressure. Now, this doesn't take into account track type or any benefits from a certain track arrangement, or suspension (usually "improved" suspensions allow wider tracks and lower ground pressure...Easy 8 Shermans were about 11.0 psi but M4A1/A3's were around 13 and the Jumbo was 14.3), but ideally track thickness is inversely proportional to ground pressure...and a number representative or relative mobility.

A Sherman tank can give you an... edge. - Oddball.
BlitzPig_Machine is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 14th, 2004   #174
I take what n0e says way too seriously
 
Kämpfer's Avatar
 
Join Date: April 27th, 2003
2,674 posts, 0 likes.
Rep Power: 29
Kämpfer is a n00b
Send a message via ICQ to Kämpfer
Default Re: M26 Pershing

Any ideas what those track attachments are called that were designed to help in movement in snow and mud?

"I am afraid we killed the wrong pig!" -Winston Churchill

"Strike with the fist, don't tickle with the fingers." -Heinz Guderian
Kämpfer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 14th, 2004   #175
Repeat Sex Offender
 
Blistex²'s Avatar
 
Join Date: November 20th, 2003
Location: Tiger I Turret
Status: Available
313 posts, 0 likes.
Rep Power: 26
Blistex² is a n00b
Default Re: M26 Pershing

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kämpfer
Any ideas what those track attachments are called that were designed to help in movement in snow and mud?
I know exactly what you're talking about. . . but for some reason can't find the correct spelling. They were something along the lines of "shruchen" or I might not even be close.

They were small plates bolted onto the tracks of Panzer III's and IV's that stuck out over the edges and few inches to make the treads wider.

Blistex² is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 14th, 2004   #176
Addicted to GF
 
BlitzPig_Machine's Avatar
 
Join Date: October 1st, 2003
Status: Available
252 posts, 0 likes.
Rep Power: 0
BlitzPig_Machine is a n00b
Default Re: M26 Pershing

No clue...I look forward to reading about it though.

The T-80 track for the M4A3E8 (HVSS) was wider than the ones used on previous Shermans and provided better mobility...but that's about as much as I know about specific track stuff.

A Sherman tank can give you an... edge. - Oddball.

Last edited by BlitzPig_Machine; January 14th, 2004 at 02:24 PM.
BlitzPig_Machine is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 14th, 2004   #177
BFE-WAW
Chief Master Sergeant
 
Join Date: November 15th, 2003
Location: Greyhound on Breakthrough
Status: Making stupid comments
1,250 posts, 0 likes.
Rep Power: 27
Mazz should make some friends
Send a message via AIM to Mazz
Default Re: M26 Pershing

you taking about the right thing but using the wrong word i think.
schurzen is the word for the added armor plates used on late model panzer IIIs and the Panzer IV H.
"Panzer IVs serving in Russia, were equipped with wider "winter tracks" (Winterketten) and since the Spring of 1944, with even wider "eastern tracks" (Ostketten)."
I think this is what u are talking about or at least this is all i could seem to find but u are talking about track attachments and these are new tracks



Ingame:[44M]B|Pvt.Bobby W.

Last edited by Mazz; January 14th, 2004 at 02:50 PM.
Mazz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 14th, 2004   #178
I would die without GF
 
Anlushac11's Avatar
 
Join Date: April 28th, 2003
Location: Babylon 5
Status: Available
15,517 posts, 41 likes.
Rep Power: 0
Anlushac11 is dead sexehAnlushac11 is dead sexehAnlushac11 is dead sexehAnlushac11 is dead sexehAnlushac11 is dead sexehAnlushac11 is dead sexehAnlushac11 is dead sexehAnlushac11 is dead sexehAnlushac11 is dead sexehAnlushac11 is dead sexehAnlushac11 is dead sexeh
Default Re: M26 Pershing

Germans IIRC called them Ostketten

Americans called them grousers, or depending on the stype duckbills.

The problem was for US and Germans was that they had a tendancy to snap off if you caught them on something, like ran over a rock or curb.
Anlushac11 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 14th, 2004   #179
I take what n0e says way too seriously
 
Kämpfer's Avatar
 
Join Date: April 27th, 2003
2,674 posts, 0 likes.
Rep Power: 29
Kämpfer is a n00b
Send a message via ICQ to Kämpfer
Default Re: M26 Pershing

Quote:
Originally Posted by Anlushac11
Germans IIRC called them Ostketten

Americans called them grousers, or depending on the stype duckbills.

The problem was for US and Germans was that they had a tendancy to snap off if you caught them on something, like ran over a rock or curb.
Yep, thats what I remember reading. They had to to take them off when going across bridges made for the tanks then put them back on once they were across, not the easiest task.

"I am afraid we killed the wrong pig!" -Winston Churchill

"Strike with the fist, don't tickle with the fingers." -Heinz Guderian
Kämpfer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 14th, 2004   #180
Revenge was here.
 
AussieZaitsev's Avatar
 
Join Date: December 14th, 2003
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Status: At a party
1,988 posts, 0 likes.
Rep Power: 27
AussieZaitsev is a regular member
Default Re: M26 Pershing

yep, the problem with the germans Ostketten was, if they wre attached it made the berth of the tank to wide for standard german military bridges, thus meaning the wehrmacht had to unbolt and bolt on the tracks of 200+ tanks just to get across one bridge

Signature removed. Please read the rules.
AussieZaitsev is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -7.







   
 





This site is part of the Defy Media Gaming network

The best serving of video game culture, since 2001. Whether you're looking for news, reviews, walkthroughs, or the biggest collection of PC gaming files on the planet, Game Front has you covered. We also make no illusions about gaming: it's supposed to be fun. Browse gaming galleries, humor lists, and honest, short-form reporting. Game on!

FileFront Forums - Terms of Service - Top
Theme Selection
Copyright © 2002-2016 Game Front. All rights reserved. Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2016, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Forum Theme by Danny King (FileTrekker), Sheepeep & Graeme(rs)
RSS Feed Widget by FeedWind